all 23 comments

[–]nalgas_sucias 17 points18 points ago

do you have a link to the original image w/o the quote?

[–]waremi[S] 27 points28 points ago

Original picture is from NASA's "Astronomy Picture of the Day" Milky Way Over Quiver Tree Forest

[–]nalgas_sucias 5 points6 points ago

OP delivers :D

[–]NightHawk929 5 points6 points ago

Why hello there fellow /r/spaceporn subscriber!

[–]DMV_line12 1 point2 points ago

I came to the comments just for your same request. Thanks OP

[–]InfiniteOcean 0 points1 point ago

Wow, talking about an OP that delivers...

[–]bogan 13 points14 points ago

Charles Schulz, though regarded by others as a great cartoonist, suffered from depression and feelings of inadequacy:

"It took me a long time to become a human being," he once said. "I never regarded myself as being much and I never regarded myself as being good-looking and I never had a date in high school, because I thought, who'd want to date me?"

Sensitive to slights, he never forgot the rejections of Central High. To the end of his life he remained baffled that the editors of the "Cehisean," the Central High yearbook, had rejected a batch of his drawings. At the age of 53, he made sure that a high school report card was printed in facsimile in a collection of his work "to show my own children that I was not as dumb as everyone has said I was." He sustained the traumas of his adolescence far into adulthood — far enough, in the end, to see them become a crucial element in the universal popularity of his art.

Chronic rejection and unrequited love are the twin plinths of Schulz's early life and later work. Even when he had become the one cartoonist known and loved by people around the world, he could still say, with conviction, "My whole life has been one of rejection."

...

Melancholy would dog him all his life, as would feelings of worthlessness, panic, high anxiety and frustration. It wouldn't matter that he married twice, raised five children, and became the most widely syndicated and beloved cartoonist of all time, attaining success on a scale no individual comic strip artist had ever known. Success fell off him. He was unable to take refuge in its rewards. With his first wife and five children, he moved in 1958 to a paradise among the redwoods of Northern California, where he briefly found happiness during a decade in which the work of his pen and the peaks of his professional achievements coincided with the nation's upheavals. But Schulz knew better than anyone that he could never really become a sunny citizen of the Golden State. He found little comfort in fame or prosperity or the California sun. Pain gave him his core. "I think that one of the things that afforded Sparky his greatness," a friend would say after his death, "was his unwillingness to turn his back on the pain."

Reference: Passages: The Life and Times of Charles Schulz

[–]jenchan13 1 point2 points ago

Thank you. This is great.

[–]waremi[S] 2 points3 points ago

Thank you, this is greatly appreciated. Helps explain why so much of his work speaks to so many of us.

[–]golden_boy 6 points7 points ago

Can someone explain this to me? I don't really get what the last line is saying

[–]godlessatheist 20 points21 points ago

He's made so many mistakes that it will take him more than one night to recall all of the mistakes he's made.

[–]abcdeline 4 points5 points ago

Not to mention, he's hearing voices talk to him.

[–]GroceryBags 6 points7 points ago

It would take more than one night to explain where he went wrong. This may sound negative but it actually acknowledges that there are so many variables to 'going wrong' that it is futile to think about it.

[–]pdxGary 1 point2 points ago

yeah, I didn't take it as negative at all. Learning to forgive one's self is an important key to life. Rather than trying to identify one major blunder to dwell on, accept you've faltered consistently and will again, and move on.

[–]critical_mess 3 points4 points ago

For me it means that it's actually futile to think about where you have gone wrong.

[–]steelerman82 3 points4 points ago

I read it as being frustrated with the world, trying to make the changes in it. Then a voice tells you, "this is going to take more than one night." out of context, as I am sure the other guy is right. but I like mine.

[–]2Punx2Furious 1 point2 points ago

Lie or Lay?

[–]waremi[S] 9 points10 points ago

Personally I would say "lay", but who am I to correct Charlie Brown?

[–]Pharien 0 points1 point ago

Lie is for people, lay is for objects. Or so I've been told.

[–]2Punx2Furious 0 points1 point ago

[–]Pharien 1 point2 points ago

This is pretty much a more detailed version of what I was trying to say. She's still using lay for objects and lie for living beings.

Also that's an adorable dress.

[–]MyOhMyke 0 points1 point ago

Does it seem like the text is 'moving' to anyone else? I know sometimes there are visual 'tricks' or whatnot like that, but it doesn't seem like it would be intentional here.

[–]Narrative_Causality 0 points1 point ago

It's amazing to think that, for 2000+ years, our ancestors had such an awesome nighttime sky to look at.