all 181 comments

[–]Bowll 54 points55 points ago

That ain't no reindeer.

[–]NikkoE82 60 points61 points ago

It's a space station.

[–]sometimesijustdont 8 points9 points ago

Why would they call it a moon if there was no nearby planet?

[–]DungbeetleBailey 16 points17 points ago

Well, there used to be a planet there, it was the Alderaan (sp?) system afterall. But it does pose an interesting question; is a moon still a moon if it's planet is destroyed but it's still orbiting the debris field? Is it still a moon if it's no longer gravitationally locked to an orbit? Does it become a rogue planetoid? Perhaps an asteroid?

It even sounds kind of zen, "when is a moon, not a moon?"

Must ask science.

[–]AceEightWins 13 points14 points ago

Once the planet is destroyed THEN it's a reindeer. Right?

[–]Apophilius 5 points6 points ago

The moon had been orbiting a planet that is now a thousand pieces shot in every direction, so naturally the object will lose its orbit.

The only way a moon would then become a planet is if it is spherical in nature and clears its orbital path (if it were to reesablish orbit around the star in that system's center).

Otherwise, the moon could occupy another planet's/ debris field's orbital trajectory, in which case it would either be a proto-planet like pluto, or another planet's moon.

Or it'll careen into the sun and liquify/sublimate. Your choice.

[–]ThirdFloorGreg 0 points1 point ago

The amount of energy it would take to "explode a planet in every direction" without it recollapsing is absurdly high, even when compared to the also insane amount it would take just blow it up enough to kill everything but not worry about dispersing it. I really don't see a reason for the Death Star to waste all the energy on the former when the latter would suffice for their purposes. Since the Millennium Falcon arrived just afterward (on a cosmic scale, anyway), the planet appeared to be gone, but it was probably coming back.

[–]Apophilius 1 point2 points ago

Remember that the planet also blew up in a fireball and the viewer could hear the "noise" from the explosion.

Somehow I feel the film developers are less interested in scientific credence than they are the entertainment value of their subject.

[–]DungbeetleBailey -3 points-2 points ago

Thank you. Have an upvote.

[–]Detry 4 points5 points ago

Not since the accident.

[–]SlasherPunk 3 points4 points ago

Shut up Dwight.

[–]katihathor 0 points1 point ago

he didn't have a red nose either...something smells fishy

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]realdeal6649 2 points3 points ago

Saying, "Came here to say this," is the same thing as saying, "Reddit please downvote me slightly more than you upvote me."

[–]VoiceOfRealson -5 points-4 points ago

Came here to say that. Glad I wasn't the only one.

[–]ContstantExcuses -1 points0 points ago

Not since the accident

[–]VVhaleBiologist 127 points128 points ago

Anyone seeking more info might also check here:

title comnts points age /r/
Rudolph doesn't take any crap. 3coms 11pts 2dys pics
Rudolph doesn't take any crap. 2coms 15pts 2dys funny
Used to... 37coms 1135pts 8dys funny
Saw this on Facebook... First pic I decided to submit 7coms 10pts 1dy funny
Not any more they don't. 82coms 1172pts 4mos AdviceAnimals
Used to...[FIXED] 1com -1pt 7dys funny
Rudolph lost his shit 11coms 177pts 1mo funny
Don't fuck around with Rudolph. 5coms 49pts 4mos AdviceAnimals
All of the other Reindeer... 6coms 19pts 4mos funny
Christmas in July! ...or not 1com 12pts 4mos funny
How rudolph got the other reindeer to shut the fuck up 7coms 138pts 3mos funny
not sure if this is a repost or not, but it made me chuckle 0coms 1pt 19hrs funny

source: karmadecay

[–]VanoFantasma 28 points29 points ago

This meme used to be funny...

[–]realdeal6649 33 points34 points ago

Before or after people pointed out that it was part of losing the velvet on his antlers?

[–]mynameisalso 11 points12 points ago

I'm kind of surprised more people don't know this, although I'm probably one of the few people on reddit who is also hunting at the moment.

[–]HorkBajirGafrash 4 points5 points ago

You... you are hunting right now?

[–]realdeal6649 8 points9 points ago

Oregon Trail of course.

[–]mynameisalso 0 points1 point ago

Yes right now, I have a Winchester 88 on my lap.

[–]lawdogslawclerk 2 points3 points ago

I hunt as well. The loss of velvet is commonly known here in the Midwest but that might be because most midwesterners own more guns than teeth.

[–]caveofnecrogond 2 points3 points ago

Midwesterner here. I have guns but prefer to bowhunt. And yeah, most people around here seem to be familiar with velvet.

[–]CJEEC_Studios 0 points1 point ago

And unfamiliar with dental hygiene? 'Cause, you know,

own more guns than teeth.

[–]caveofnecrogond 0 points1 point ago

From what I've seen, most people around here happen to be pretty familiar with dental hygiene. Remember, the Midwest isn't the South. We have lots of hunting, fishing, camping, crops, farming, etc...as well as a slower pace of life. But it's not Deliverance here, either.

[–]CJEEC_Studios 0 points1 point ago

I read your comment and reread my comment and I realize what I was quoting now. The person I quoted meant by saying people in the midwest own more guns than teeth meant to say that people in the midwest own more than 34 guns.

And please pardon my poor grammar; I am sleep deprived at this moment.. .

[–]newloaf -2 points-1 points ago

Do people know deer aren't carnivorous?

[–]CannibalShinobi 6 points7 points ago

An animal doesn't have to be carnivorous to fuck another animal up.

[–]mynameisalso 0 points1 point ago

May not eat meat, but a buck in rut is the most dangerous animal in the woods.

[–]Kidpunk04 0 points1 point ago

I am also inclined to believe that the antlers are shopped since the spots indicate a fawn not an adult male....... just sayin

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

It's a chital, axis or spotted deer. Whichever suits you best.

[–]jonahlew 8 points9 points ago

Used to...

[–]Treefacebeard 1 point2 points ago

before the accident

[–]No-Im-Not-Serious 0 points1 point ago

...but then it took an arrow to the knee. I'll just show myself out.

[–]Gootang 0 points1 point ago

Only bad people repost...

[–]N0gai 0 points1 point ago

I just thought 'hmm... didn't I see this just a few days before?' and then i saw your comment. Thanks.

[–]this_is_who_I_am 10 points11 points ago

USED to be funny.

Used to.

[–]Doebino 8 points9 points ago

[–]googooga_joob 5 points6 points ago

[–]onebadmofo 3 points4 points ago

[–]algorithmae 0 points1 point ago

photoshop filter =/= jpeg compression

[–]kuroyaki 1 point2 points ago

I like the idea that shitty JPEG compression is the next stage in photographer purism...

[–]Doebino 0 points1 point ago

I was trying to be subtle.. that's just ridiculous.

[–]tagrav 170 points171 points ago

Sigh, you people realize that deer lose their antlers annually at which they grow back larger the next year. The reason you don't find deer antlers sheds all over the woods is that the old antlers are a tasty treat for creatures like squirrels.

While growing in they have a layer of skin over top of them which they will eventually rub off on trees when the antlers have fully grown in. This is what it looks like.

[–]HASHTAG_YOLOSWAG 20 points21 points ago

I find antler shed in the woods sometimes and make decorative lampstands out of them.

[–]Frolie27 75 points76 points ago

No way!? I find decorative lampstands in the woods sometimes and make antlers out of them!

[–]HASHTAG_YOLOSWAG 20 points21 points ago

We should collaborate.

[–]Frolie27 9 points10 points ago

Create an unending cycle of changing antlers into lampstands and vise versa....Profit!

[–]PinneappleSoup 6 points7 points ago

You two...you're going to be something special.

[–]a battlemechStompedyourhousewith 4 points5 points ago

but instead of deer, we should use people!

[–]mocthezuma 2 points3 points ago

And instead of antlers, genitalia!

[–]thyhorrorcosmic 1 point2 points ago

And listen...

[–]Gen_McMuster 1 point2 points ago

but your powers would cancel the each other's out.

creating a singularity

[–]HASHTAG_YOLOSWAG 1 point2 points ago

This is how the world ends in sixteen days.

[–]Big_Theta 82 points83 points ago

Thanks, Professor KillJoke.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]idikia 2 points3 points ago

Porter Rockwell?

[–]SoCo_cpp 8 points9 points ago

Additionally, being a full grown deer with spots, is a good tip of that this isn't your plain North American White Tail Deer, but some sort Fallow Deer. If I recall correctly, Fallow Deer typically have a "velvet" (a layer of skin with fuzzy velvet feeling hair/fur) covering their antlers year round. Your standard deer has velvet covering just for a short time during the season where they are growing new antlers, that they shed looking much like the picture, revealing just their bone-like antlers for the majority of the time.

[–]Zoology_Guy 1 point2 points ago

Well you are half right, you see all deer (cervids) go through an antler cycle. The cycle is almost identical regardless of species, this "velvet" as it is called is actually the vascularized tissue of the antler as it grows. The antler then begins to mineralize and work outward and eventually the velvet is shed by the deer but as it is still vascularized it does bleed. The antlers velvet and grow most of the year and then, depending on the seasonality of the deer, their testosterone spikes and it causes the mineralization process to begin and for deer to put on weight for rutting. Rutting is when male deer compete over mates through fighting and the use of their antlers. The testosterone then bottoms out and the antlers are shed before the winter sets in and they begin to grow again as velvet. They will continue to grow until the testosterone spikes again. However, if you castrate a deer, it will continue to grow antlers indefinitely and they will never mineralize and shed. This of course leads one to the realization that if santa's reindeer have antlers in winter, they are all castrated males... damn santa that's cold

Edit: Female reindeer can also have antlers during the winter but they are smaller and are only present if the female has calved that year and has something to protect

[–]SoCo_cpp 0 points1 point ago

So no real distinction between antler velveting cycles of deer species.

[–]Zoology_Guy 1 point2 points ago

Small variations depending on when the deer rut, but for the most part, ya no real distinctions, they all velvet for most of the year and then shed around summer time. But I have to agree with you and say that the spots make it a dead ringer for a fallow deer

[–]MiseryIsFree 11 points12 points ago

Very true my good sir/maam. However, this is reddit. Nobody here goes outside, let alone knows what happens to deer every year.

[–]yodamaster103 0 points1 point ago

there are so many fucking deer around my house it's not even funny

[–]IHaveAStory 2 points3 points ago

Well if they are procreating about your house it is no wonder there are lots of them.

[–]cozzbp 0 points1 point ago

As someone who occasionally goes deer hunting, I resent that.

[–]SlasherPunk 1 point2 points ago

While growing in they have a layer of skin over top of them which they will eventually rub off on trees when the antlers have fully grown in.

Ouch.

[–]Samjogo 6 points7 points ago

By the time that they rub off their velvet, the blood veins have usually constricted and cut off blood flow. I don't imagine they actually feel anything when they do it.

[–]dirice87 7 points8 points ago

i bet its itchy like old scabs are for us

[–]PretendsToKnowThings 4 points5 points ago

shivers with glee

[–]paistekid52 2 points3 points ago

"That. Is. Co-rrect."

[–]thebitchrake 1 point2 points ago

No one ever gets when I say this.

[–]frenzyboard 3 points4 points ago

It's not exactly comfortable for the trees either.

[–]SlasherPunk 0 points1 point ago

Tree don't feel pain.

[–]frenzyboard 0 points1 point ago

It rubs the bark off. This leaves visible scarring and hampers the growth of the tree. It also leaves it vulnerable to fungal infection or insect infestation.

In short, it can kill the tree.

[–]SlasherPunk 0 points1 point ago

True. But a tree does not have a nervous system. So it cannot feel comfort or pain.

[–]frenzyboard 0 points1 point ago

Okay. So define "feeling".

Plants do send electrical signals. They might not sense pain the same way we do, but they do register and react to bodily harm. They're "aware" of their surroundings in a certain sense.

You can't just think of them as non living things. They are alive. They have a birth, life, and death. They produce hormones, create and use electric signals, they eat, excrete, and mate. They do everything animals do; they just do it differently.

[–]SlasherPunk 0 points1 point ago

I never claimed that they were non-living. I responded to your claim that trees feel "uncomfortable" which is not true because they can sense what is happening to them but they cannot experience pain like humans do. So it can't be said that they feel uncomfortable.

[–]frenzyboard 0 points1 point ago

If they didn't understand the harm that had been done to them, they wouldn't start healing. But they do. So yes. It's not comfortable for them to have their bark stripped.

I think you have a misunderstanding between mental pain and mechanical pain. I'm not arguing that plants have minds or consciousness. But it doesn't take consciousness to register pain. It takes consciousness to be angry or sad or regretful about pain. It takes some physical action to react and reorganize after a painful event, though.

Think of it another way. Your skin gets cut. Does your skin feel pain? Not really. Your skin registers that it's functions are being disrupted, and your brain interprets that signal as pain. Your body then produces the right hormone reaction to cause other cells and proteins to seal up that cut, and produce the right cells to regrow that area of skin.

All of those processes could happen without you "feeling" them, as the reaction is physical, rather than mental. But your body still reacts in a way to bring itself back to a comfortable living condition.

[–]SlasherPunk 0 points1 point ago

Comfort is a sense of well-being. You need to have a nervous system in order to feel or even understand what comfort means. When a tree is bruised, it starts the healing process which it is able to do naturally. There's no question of comfort or discomfort. It is just programmed to do say by evolution. Saying a tree feels uncomfortable is an oxymoron.

[–]pantsfactory 0 points1 point ago

yeah, though I gotta say I'm envious of the fact that it only happens once a year, and not every month like for humans

[–]a battlemechStompedyourhousewith 0 points1 point ago

its funnier if you just call it "deer puberty"

[–]Chezzabe 0 points1 point ago

When it is shedding it is also itchy as hell!

[–]devkrev 0 points1 point ago

What do you MEAN YOU PEOPLE?

Racist..

[–]mollshenanigans 0 points1 point ago

For some reason this makes it more disturbing than if the deer had actually just killed something.

[–]Ashatron 0 points1 point ago

Commonly known as shedding velvet.

[–]zgh5002 0 points1 point ago

This layer of skin is very soft and fuzzy, leading to the term "A buck in velvet."

[–]maineac 0 points1 point ago

On top of that... THIS ISN'T EVEN A FUCKING REINDEER!

[–]asianaaronx 0 points1 point ago

That's what I came here to say.

[–]BoerboelFace 0 points1 point ago

But Confession Bear really does have stinky balls though right?

[–]redditspice 1 point2 points ago

you all know this, you're the wet blanket that is acting like a smug cunt

unfuck yourself

[–]AdmiralSkippy -4 points-3 points ago

Never mind that, those antlers don't even belong to that animal. First off a caribou or deer with spots on it would never be able to grow antlers that big.
Second off the animal in the picture is a deer, not a caribou and wouldn't be growing antlers like that even if it were big enough.

[–]Cant_Remember_Pass 3 points4 points ago

Well, you do get points for kind of knowing what you are talking about. Deer in North America that still have spots would not be able to grow antlers this large. As far as the type of antlers go, true these do not look like antlers of any north american deer species. However, they also do not look like caribou antlers either. At best you could say that they look like they belong on an elk.

That being said, this is a chital, or "spotted deer" and looks just fine.

Edit: This repost however, is not fine.

[–]AdmiralSkippy 0 points1 point ago

I thought it looked a bit big for it to be a fawn. I guess those are in the US or something then? As far as I know we don't have them in Canada.

[–]XenoRat 2 points3 points ago

Taxidermist here, it's most likely a fallow deer(the antlers look like an axis, but the colors aren't quite right. Antlers vary more than colors though, so I'll stick with my first assumption) They originate from Asia, but they're raised here for trophy hunters.

[–]AdmiralSkippy 1 point2 points ago

That always makes me laugh when I watch a hunting show and they're at one of those farms for "trophy hunting". You're not hunting, you just told them to open gate 4 and poke out the big one.
It's like when they do the African Safari hunts and they set the blind up next to the watering hole.

[–]XenoRat 1 point2 points ago

They're often the weirdest kind of stingy too. They have guns more expensive than my van, spend three grand to shoot some pretty exotic creature, then when it comes time to get the thing mounted(the whole point of that kind of "hunt") they shop around to save $50 regardless of quality and get the cheapest, most basic mount possible.

[–]Cant_Remember_Pass 0 points1 point ago

Upvote to you sir. Upon a closer look I do believe that you are correct. The antlers not being palmate threw off my initial ID. In my haste I also totally missed the Adam's apple that makes this a Fallow buck.

[–]Cant_Remember_Pass 1 point2 points ago

Not in the US, they are found in some countries in Asia. Nepal and India among others. For sure they aren't in Canada or I would have tried to hunt one by now (fellow Canadian here). Sorry if my first reply sounded rude, my intention was simply to pass on information.

[–]ThirdFloorGreg 0 points1 point ago

There are some introduced populations of fallow deer in the US and Canada.

[–]bwsauder 20 points21 points ago

/r/AdviceAnimals rules:

No reposts, if you didn't make it, don't post it.

[–]Cass_the_Lass 2 points3 points ago

Also, that is a Fallow Deer. Not a reindeer.

[–]patch385 2 points3 points ago

The thing is though, all deer have this happen to them when their new antlers grow, they tear the velvet off on trees.

[–]Jackie_ChiIes 7 points8 points ago

Cant really understand this gets reposted so much, its not that funny.

[–]always_useful 0 points1 point ago

It's December so this needs to be posted every day until Christmas has passed. I guess...

[–]jsabot 0 points1 point ago

Oh deer

[–]donaldducks 0 points1 point ago

not bad

[–]jonahlew 2 points3 points ago

I'll just put this here.

[–]DatSergal 3 points4 points ago

Enjoy your downvotes, OP.

[–]JfArcher 0 points1 point ago

Holy re-post Batman. How is this on the front page?!

[–]LostInSmoke 2 points3 points ago

Stop posting this every day you spamming fucks.

[–]Jack_of_all_offs 2 points3 points ago

Not since the accident.

[–]I_the_mighty -1 points0 points ago

NOOOOOOPE

[–]SubZero_Karma0124 0 points1 point ago

I'm pretty sure thats an axis deer too.

[–]hemmetti 0 points1 point ago

I'd vote him... We had a ex rock-musician-drughead in our government with an stupid baskue hat. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/Veltto_Virtanen_2010.jpg/919px-Veltto_Virtanen_2010.jpg

[–]having_sex_right_now 1 point2 points ago

punchline <-> title

[–]Shannynh 1 point2 points ago

For the first time ever, I have seen something on reddit that I saw on facebook several days before.

[–]nightly_intruder 1 point2 points ago

Bad photo shop fail... fawn with spots and rack? Don't get lazy reddit

[–]KittyTwister 0 points1 point ago

Not since the accident

[–]karagang -1 points0 points ago

Gotta love reposts making 1k+ karma

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

that's antler felt from rutting and shedding....

[–]unknown_poo 0 points1 point ago

Reindeer version of Karate Kyle!

[–]RapinRapist 0 points1 point ago

That isn't even a reindeer.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

youre a douchebag and you should feel bad.

[–]theceasar 0 points1 point ago

Ew, shedding velvet is kinda grody...

[–]weeksy777 0 points1 point ago

Oh deer that's bad

[–]JamaicanAirlines 0 points1 point ago

not a reindeer

[–]Zoomerlawns 0 points1 point ago

I give this post... puts on glasses
...eight points.
YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!

[–]ares2101 0 points1 point ago

Oddly enough, I just learned earlier today that Deer do this.

[–]danisnotfunny 0 points1 point ago

It's shedding its velt, they all do that...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

This is not a reindeer.

[–]SethChrisDominic 0 points1 point ago

QUICK! SOMEBODY PHOTOSHOP HIS NOSE TO BE RED!

[–]Oznog99 0 points1 point ago

I am in command of my faculties! In command of my troops! Antler guides me in all things! As I in turn guide my kin!

[–]Paul_El 0 points1 point ago

Any photoshop master want to tint his nose red??

[–]Top_rattata 0 points1 point ago

I'll never sneek down stairs on Christmas again

[–]WolfPaws123 0 points1 point ago

That's a natural occurrence, where the new antlers are coming in, and the "velvet" on their antlers is shed off. Also, this picture (above) is the second image when you search "deer shedding velvet" on google.

Velvet

[–]abcirulis 0 points1 point ago

Holly shit! I saw this on Facebook before here...guess there's a first (and only) time for everything.

[–]TheWhiteChocolate 0 points1 point ago

It's not even blood. It's from him scraping the velvet from his antlers during the rut.

[–]dorfking 0 points1 point ago

Thats not a god damn reindeer!

[–]GangsterGRooster 0 points1 point ago

Before the accident

[–]Afroemo 0 points1 point ago

this post never fails to make me smile , have seen it so many times

[–]BlueOctoberHunter -1 points0 points ago

not even a reindeer.

[–]will_at_work 1 point2 points ago

his nose is perpetually red from the blood of his enemies

[–]Cass_the_Lass 1 point2 points ago

As someone who lives on a commercial deer farm, I must add that antler shed, coupled with the calls of bucks in rut, can be absolutely terrifying when walking alone in the dark. Sounds like a lion barking.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

Used to what? repost? because this is what this is, a fucking repost.

[–]willrd88 0 points1 point ago

Hey! I remember when I posted this 4 months ago! Sweet. Glad everyone liked it twice.

[–]PepNYC 1 point2 points ago

Yep. This has been posted at least 4 times in the last year.

[–]willrd88 0 points1 point ago

Yeah. I posted it the first time 4 months ago. Someone posted this picture in r/pics and I made it that night. First time I've seen anything I made reposted tho

[–]tominabox1 -3 points-2 points ago

yeah this has been posted like 10 times in the last week

[–]Nodiac -1 points0 points ago

Silly americans that ain't no reindeer.

[–]DickTreeFactory -4 points-3 points ago

YEAH I USED TO LAUGH AT THIS SHIT FUCK HEAD

[–]manmoon -3 points-2 points ago

I'm not convinced this is a reindeer. It looks like a different kind of deer.

[–]bri35 1 point2 points ago

I think it's a fallow deer.

[–]syncopator 1 point2 points ago

Apparently it's a repost deer.

[–]Quacksandpiper -2 points-1 points ago

Cold blooded killing machine.

[–]wildstarr 0 points1 point ago

Don't worry guys, I'll repost this in a few hours.

[–]PostHedge_Hedgehog -2 points-1 points ago

THAT COMMA IS SO PAINFUL TO READ

[–]SHINE09 -2 points-1 points ago

Repost.

Not a reindeer.

Double BS.

[–]FAGGOTSTAMP -4 points-3 points ago

░░█▀█░█▀█░░░█░█▀▀░░░█▀█░░░ ░░█░█░█▀▀░░░█░▀▀█░░░█▀█░░░ ░░▀▀▀░▀░░░░░▀░▀▀▀░░░▀░▀░░░

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░█▀▀░█▀█░█▀▀░█▀▀░█▀█░▀█▀░░ ░█▀░░█▀█░█░█░█░█░█░█░░█░░░ ░▀░░░▀░▀░▀▀▀░▀▀▀░▀▀▀░░▀░▀░

[–]SoulTea -2 points-1 points ago

Adolf the Red Nosed Reindeer

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]HASHTAG_YOLOSWAG 0 points1 point ago

no

[–]zergymeister -2 points-1 points ago

yeah this is actually pretty disgusting. i doubt anyone will feel like laughing when they see the img and read the text....

[–]99trumpets 3 points4 points ago

Why is it disgusting? The velvet is just rubbing off. Happens every year.

[–]zergymeister -1 points0 points ago

indeed. doesn't mean it's pretty to look at. that is blood, amirite? im just one person saying i dont think it looks pretty