this post was submitted on
1,053 points (53% like it)
7,943 up votes 6,890 down votes

pics

subscribe2,700,001 readers

5,684 users here now

For an image subreddit with fewer restrictions, check out /r/misc!

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  6. No animated images. Please submit them to /r/gif, /r/gifs, or /r/reactiongifs instead.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
/r/doodles /r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles
  /r/PastAndPresentPics .

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]MR_WITTY_RESPONSE 593 points594 points ago

I'm getting some popcorn and when I come back this thread will be a war zone

[–]EvengerX 88 points89 points ago

I'm just waiting for the John Madden commentary

[–]the_kiron 101 points102 points ago

I think that by the end of the game, whoever has the most points is going to win.

[–]doctor_alien 60 points61 points ago

john madden john madden john madden aeiou aeiou aeiou aeiou

[–]daniel_hlfrd 61 points62 points ago

Oh no! Here comes another chinese earthquake: ebrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr

[–]DeanOnFire 25 points26 points ago

holla hola get $

[–]pldidit 15 points16 points ago

brbr? hue.

[–]sj2011 16 points17 points ago

SNAKE? SNAKE?
SNAAAACK

[–]fecklessness 26 points27 points ago

"The team who plays the best defense is usually gonna score more points, and typically the team with the most points wins."

[–]fawker 202 points203 points ago

Wow, I was really wondering how I ended up in /r/politics.

[–]TheHatman9 81 points82 points ago

you mean /r/worldpolitics ?

[–]very_long_stick 43 points44 points ago

9/10 of the top submissions are about Israel.

[–]ARMAcre1 30 points31 points ago

Anyone have any news on whats going on in Syria?

[–]GiantWhaleCannon 11 points12 points ago

Some Syrian tanks crossed into Israel a week or so ago. Does that count?

[–]very_long_stick 17 points18 points ago

Why did Israel sneak under the Syrian tanks?

[–]AgamemnonV1 3 points4 points ago

/r/worldnews is no different as well.

[–]very_long_stick 53 points54 points ago

Reddit has been pretty anti-Israel on the default subreddits for a long time.

[–]zennilicious 45 points46 points ago

That actually reflects the current world-wide trend. The US is one of the only countries where Israel has an over-all good impression (along with Nigeria for some reason). Most people really don't like them.

[–]swishmael612 2 points3 points ago

Nigeria- irrigation R&D. Israel is the world leader in irrigation technology (they kind of need to be, they're in the middle of the desert and the Sea of Gallillee is becoming smaller by the week)... They've given Nigeria a lot of their technology

[–]Lucky_Striker 4 points5 points ago

Nigerians will say they like you if you promise to give them your bank account so they can transfer money out. I can just see them thinking "jews... ...can do business with them."

I'll see myself out through the "racial slur" exit.

[–]Atario 130 points131 points ago

I'm not sure I understand the first three numbers. For example, are those children that side has killed, or children that side has had killed by the other side?

[–]discipula_vitae 193 points194 points ago

Let me explain. This poster is biased toward hating the Israelis. That means that if you see a number, and it insinuates that the Israelis did something better than the Palestinians, you're reading it wrong.

[–]JohnAbruzzi 33 points34 points ago

True but you can't omit information that has a strong argument for one side as bias.

For example:

Hitler led to the killing of millions of Jews. The Jews killed 0 Hitler(s)

This cannot be said to be bias just because it 'insinuates that the Jews did something better than hitler.

[–]judehoffman 50 points51 points ago

I've seen Inglourious Basterds.

Jews killed exactly 1 Hitler, which is better than the 0 Hitlers Hitler killed.

[–]spaceman-spiffy 65 points66 points ago

When in reality, Hitler tops the all time leader board for Hitlers killed

[–]judehoffman 6 points7 points ago

Wow, he sounds like a great guy.

[–]chadextrabacon 2 points3 points ago

The man speaks truth.

[–]70000 1038 points1039 points ago

Wow it's great that the world is so black and white

[–]pretzelzetzel 669 points670 points ago

Middle Eastern geopolitics is pretty simple stuff, all in all.

[–]Theorex 212 points213 points ago

It's a wonder this whole conflict thingy hasn't been resolved already.

[–]pretzelzetzel 7 points8 points ago

Big Oil and Big Pharma know the solution but they're keeping it hidden from the American SHEEPLE.

[–]mediumrareplease 43 points44 points ago

I'm taking my Senior Seminar in Middle East Politics right now, and if I hadn't picked up the sarcasm, my head would have exploded.

[–]ESiNEM09 158 points159 points ago

I like how they broke it down into teams so it feels like a football game or something, where the harder working team always wins. That way, my small American brain can understand. Thanks guys!

[–]cyaspy 42 points43 points ago

I want to hijack the top comment to show everybody OP's buried comment (currently with -3 score):

Anything even remotely against Israel or defending the Palestinian "people" cause is being donvoted to oblivion. By who? I've copied this from another thread by Reddit user HouseofHouse: That's because they have an army of online people who are alerted to your comment via a desktop application so they can drown you out with cries of anti-semitism and slurs. It is real. http://www.giyus.org/about-us.html[1][1] http://www.thejidf.org/2008/10/about-jidf.html[2][2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaphone_desktop_tool[3][3]

So, apparently the Zionist downvote-organizations have targeted this post. Man, I love conspirators.

[–]hackiavelli 48 points49 points ago

Just imagine if you ran the same stats on the United States and Afghanistan.

[–]Jimhanson 39 points40 points ago

USA WOULD BE WINNING HOLLA

[–]cojiba 12 points13 points ago

yeah, the only thing you can say clearly is that both sides have descended into understandable but violent extremes, and the only way that it will be resolved is if both sides appeal to their better nature and agree to 1.) recognize the other's right to exist, 2.) trust each other to not want to harm the other in the future and 3.) trust each other to remain in solidarity for peace and shout down internal voices that agitate for violence.

I hope this can happen some day. But having studied history, I fear that it is unlikely because Israel's advantage over Palestine is too great. Because of that, it is difficult for people on both sides to have faith in a moderate solution.

[–]Jackdaws7 3 points4 points ago

1.) recognize the other's right to exist

This made my heart cringe. It should be such a simple acknowledgement of human rights, and these people call themselves religious? It's fucking disgusting.

[–]Illipsious 0 points1 point ago

Yeah! Why doesn't Israel just give them the stuff! And stop doing!

[–]AmericaFarGone 865 points866 points ago

Wait, the Palestinians have never violated any resolution of the United Nations? So there's no resolution against firing rockets into civilian territory as an act of religious vengeance? Nothing in the history of United Nations law could possibly be interpreted to suggest that maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't do that?

[–]JustCallMeBen 1068 points1069 points ago

They didn't violate any resolutions because they aren't a country recognized by the UN.

Problem solved!

[–]demon_ix 513 points514 points ago

Technically correct. The best kind of correct.

[–]MagicSPA 90 points91 points ago

Technically, yes.

[–]MenWhoStareAtG0ATSE 85 points86 points ago

The best kind of yes.

[–]Bla34112 47 points48 points ago

To be fair, It was the UN that refused to acknowledge their nationhood in the first place.

[–]chaunceytoben 50 points51 points ago

Do you mean before or after the UN offered them a homeland? An offer they rejected.

Palestinians won't accept a two-state solution because they believe Israel needs to be pushed into the Mediterranean. Israel accepted a two-state solution in 1947 and have offered a two-state solution multiple times in the many fruitless negotiations.

[–]1337Lulz 9 points10 points ago

Do you mean before or after the UN offered them a homeland?

As in, only part of the homeland they had already been occupying before the UN even existed?

[–]TheOneFreeEngineer 28 points29 points ago

you mean half a homeland, carved out of their original land with half of it going to a mixture of natives, third generation immigrants, first illegal immigrates (British tried to stop many Jews from emigrating to Israel). Its like offering Texas half of Texas as a homeland while Hispanic people from around the world get their own country out of the other half of the land. who in Texas would accept that?

[–]iouiu 5 points6 points ago

Need a source please.

The last 'statehood' offer under Clinton that they would have gotten would have divided Palestine into 30 or so 'enclaves' surrounded by settlements, that is why they rejected that one. Never knew UN actually offered them anything.

[–]Jaerdo 29 points30 points ago

Is this why Hamas doesn't want a two state solution?

[–]Chuckieshere 47 points48 points ago

Yes. If they became a country the next rocket fired over would be an excuse for Israel to roll in and take over. Israel should really let them become a state, theres no way Hamas would be able to keep everyone under control. Someone would break to truce.

Edit: my post sounds kinda cynical now that I re-read it. I don't want Israel to attack, I would rather two states with Hamas out.

[–]Acidictadpole 17 points18 points ago

Yes. If they became a country the next rocket fired over would be an excuse for Israel to role in and take over.

And then it would be one state again, and we'd be back where we started?

[–]Chuckieshere 2 points3 points ago

Ya, I made an edit because it came out sounding weird.

But If that were too happen, best case is Israel takes down the security barrier and tries to make one cohesive country. We can always hope!

[–]Jaerdo 8 points9 points ago

I agree that a two state solution is the best thing. You have the problem of the West Bank being isolated, but that is something Israel is going to have to take a hit to solve (deeding land for a road etc).

The real interesting thing would be to see what the world says of.Hamas should there be peace.y guess? North Korea / Iran style condemnation. You know, because they are incredibly corrupt, rule through fear and violence, and take only minimal strides to improve their people's standard of living.

[–]Its_a_sue-ance 15 points16 points ago

Hamas does not want peace. They want victory. There is a difference.

[–]Davidisontherun 3 points4 points ago

Hamas has offered a truce in return for the 1967 borders but Israel didn't accept

[–]Paddy_Tanninger 13 points14 points ago

When was this? I only ask because Israel has, in the past, given back quite a lot of land and territory, and it never seems to have any affect at all.

I think the borders they really want back are all of Israel, and they won't be happy to stop until that happens.

I recall it being a news topic around 2008, but when you look at stats, there's simply no indication of their offer being genuine. Here's rocket/mortar attacks throughout 2008...they seem to calm down around the time of talks, but we're still talking about 1-2 launches per day here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rock_mort_gaza_2008.JPG

You need to remember that the Hamas strategy is largely a smear campaign. They employ a similar strategy to what Romney did, where he lied and falsified things SO MUCH that no one could keep track anymore and just stopped caring about it. By the end of his campaign, we'd stopped upvoting ridiculous stuff he made up or flopped on, other than the REALLY bad ones. It's the same for Hamas; they launch such a huge amount of ordinance into Israel on a daily/monthly/yearly basis that people simply forget and go numb to it. You don't see news reports about Hamas launching. You'll see a report here or there when they kill someone, but the launches are just standard fair now.

[–]playinodds 4 points5 points ago

incorrect. Hamas offered a 10 year truce if israel acceded to all of its demands including the 1967 borders, half of jerusalem, no restriction on gaza weaponry at all, etc. In other words, Hamas offered a truce of there was no negotiations.

WOW, WONDERFUL ATTEMPT AT PEACE.

[–]Chuckieshere 5 points6 points ago

The way I look at it is Hamas was voted out of necessity. They know the second there is a two state solution, Palestine will get rid of them. Like you said, they're not really there for the people.

The West Bank and the settlements are two huge problems. I think Israel wanted Jordan to take the West Bank(citation?) at some point, but they said no. The settlements will only come down if Israel is 100% sure that everything else would go to plan, even then they might be reluctant to take on such an expensive project.

[–]AndyYankee17 130 points131 points ago

Hamas is a terrorist organization with very close ties to Al Qaeda. They want a one state solution and everyone who isn't Muslim dead.

[–]Fadoraforever 167 points168 points ago

The UN does not recognise Palestine; and as such has passed no resolutions regarding their action (to my knowledge, limited as it is)

[–]gavri32 135 points136 points ago

Therefore the entire "scoreboard" is invalid. If Palestine wants to be treated like a country they have to act like one. They can't just play by the rules when it's politically convenient

[–]ViperXeon 65 points66 points ago

No matter how they act, they would never become a UN valid country, Israel wouldn't allow it. End of. They are both acting like fucking kids and the poor people are getting stuck in the middle of it all, just as usual.

[–]okfornothing 10 points11 points ago

Its not Israel's decision or am I wrong? How is it that Israel can decide of the world governments will or will not recognize Palestine as a state?

[–]grwly 35 points36 points ago

Israel and the US are in the UN. Furthermore, the US is in the Security Council of the UN. Whenever Palestinian statehood is voted on, those two countries are guaranteed "Nay"s. Last time, they were the only two nays. But a security council vote is more powerful than a majority vote. I'm pretty sure the security council requires consensus before approving a motion

[–]paper_zoe 14 points15 points ago

I don't think the security council needs a majority vote, but permanent members (the US, China, Russia, France and the UK) have a veto.

[–]CreauxTeeRhobat 3 points4 points ago

As far as the US being an automatic "Nay," I believe it is the current administration's stance that a 2-state solution would be beneficial for regional stabilization. While they have not come out with a definite statement, their current stance toward Israel and Palestine shows a keen preference to which side they would take if a vote came up.

In all likelihood that a vote ever reaches the UN General Assembly, I believe it would pass, regardless of Israel's influence, mainly due to the huge influence other nations have, mainly Russia, Iran, Sudan, Egypt, Indonesia, and every other Muslim country. The SC has Russia, China, and non-permanent members Morocco and Pakistan. And, with all things in the UN, it depends on where the money is coming from.

[–]TheWhiteNashorn 5 points6 points ago

Anyone in the Security Council can just veto the whole thing. End of decision. So yes, they have to have a consensus.

[–]ViperXeon 5 points6 points ago

67% of the UN have agreed it is a country, but because the US as well as it allies whom will always agree with them in most things, have the most sway, it will never recognize it as a country. Just goes to show how the UN is just a façade which can still be manipulated.

[–]RikuKat 4 points5 points ago

You need a better understanding of politics.

It's a power play and Israel has a lot of power, especially in influencing Jewish votes in the US, which is why US presidents avoid calling them out on anything.

[–]Joe_12265 28 points29 points ago

That is ridiculous. Each US President has the geopolitical situation explained to them and they all, without exception, have decided that a strong Israel is in the best interest of the US. You really think Obama is in the back pocket of Jews and that is the reason he supports Israel? Cmon, that is just silly on its face (and vaguely antisemitic).

If the region could remove Israel and solidify under the Muslim Brotherhood how would that work out for the US? It ain't easy running an empire when 1/3rd of the world is suddenly united under leadership that has been telling its followers that the US is pretty much Satan in a Can for 50 years. As it is Iraq is teetering on the brink of falling into fundamentalist hands that would happily renew an oil embargo. Syria? Yes, them too. Egypt? Of course.

Saudi is a tougher nut to crack but if you surrounded them with fundamentalist regimes they would fall too. Then what? So as a US President do you want them all bickering over Israel or do you want them all united and using their oil reserves as a trade weapon? When you have a full overview it is plainly obvious why US Presidents uniformly support Israel. The alternatives all suck from a US perspective.

If you want to you can think of Israel as a permanent US military base. The whole thing makes more sense if you do that.

[–]thosefeels 7 points8 points ago

To be fair, Israel should probably act like a country too even if one might not agree with the means by which it was formed. There are fairly good arguments that could be made that it's nearing, if not already, at the point of being a rogue state that just is allowed to be that way because the United States backs it.

[–]Noxfag 3 points4 points ago

As if not being part of the UN is some kind of good thing? Palestine would love to be part of the UN and has tried many times to gain the membership that it should be granted by default.

[–]brendax 75 points76 points ago

You can't expect a college orientation day booth to consider things, man.

[–]littlebufflo 111 points112 points ago

This is the most misleading stat up there. The UN council on human rights has a mandatory review of the state of Israel every year. Israel is the only country that undergoes this process, and is the only country to be specifically condemned. In fact, a full 40% of all the country specific condemnations by the UN are directed at Israel. Even if you hate them, Israel is not 40% of the worlds problems. Wikipedia is actually a really solid lead on this one.

I hate to sound conspiratorial, and to disclose my biases I'm no fan of the UN, but this is really the organization at its worst. Arab countries surrounding Israel have a clear need/desire to justify aggressive stances toward them. As a result, they pack subgroups (like the council on human rights) full of members, and then proceed to generate tons of reports condemning Israel, to use as independent justification for condemning the Zionists.

[–]very_long_stick 29 points30 points ago

Arab countries surrounding Israel have a clear need/desire to justify aggressive stances toward them.

It's not just the Arabs but almost all Muslim countries are extremely anti-Israel.

[–]zennilicious 16 points17 points ago

It's not just Muslim countries, but almost all countries that are more anti-Israel than pro.

[–]Noxfag 3 points4 points ago

The UN resolutions don't mean UN laws. They mean specific resolutions orientated toward that country- effectively orders by the UN to do something. Israel has received by far more than any other country in the world, mostly saying "don't kill people" and they're always promptly ignored.

[–]applesoup 2 points3 points ago

You're trying to justify Israel's numerous violations of UN resolutions and international laws by trying to pin some on Palestine?

[–]IAmTheRedWizards 71 points72 points ago

"May not receive outside help", eh? I guess they designed and built those shiny new launchers capable of hitting Tel Aviv all on their own then. Fucking MacGyver-level folks over in Gaza.

[–]Knov 50 points51 points ago

oh boy here we go

[–]itsrattlesnake 111 points112 points ago

[–]thexfiles81 28 points29 points ago

[–]valleyshrew 273 points274 points ago

I wonder why so few Israelis die. Maybe because they have the highest number of bomb shelters per capita, the highest number of doctors per capita, a missile defense program costing billions of dollars and the highest research and development spending per capita by far in the world. That many Palestinians die is because of Palestinian actions such as using human shields and firing rockets from hospitals. Israel takes more measures to reduce civilian casualties than any other country in such a conflict.

Watch the pro-Palestinian documentary "Death in Gaza" from 2005 to see how Palestinian children are used.

"Lots of boys I have raised with my own hands have been martyred...when we have to say goodbye to Ahmed there are thousands of more boys like him."

Or see this quote from a leader of Hamas from just a couple of weeks ago:

[The enemies of Allah] do not know that the Palestinian people has developed its [methods] of death and death-seeking. For the Palestinian people, death has become an industry, at which women excel, and so do all the people living on this land. The elderly excel at this, and so do the mujahideen and the children. This is why they have formed human shields of the women, the children, the elderly, and the mujahideen, in order to challenge the Zionist bombing machine. It is as if they were saying to the Zionist enemy: "We desire death like you desire life." - Fathi Hammad

[–]anonymous123421 0 points1 point ago

Well put. I've been trying to explain this, and you've nailed it. Could you stop by r/ELI5? We could use your help-- if you check my recent comment history, you'll see my numerous efforts to explain this to no avail.

[–]topki 237 points238 points ago

/r/propaganda asked for its picture

[–]sleepy_wall -4 points-3 points ago

So it's inaccurate?

[–]Buhandi 166 points167 points ago

It's incredibly misleading.

[–]sleepy_wall -4 points-3 points ago

But not inaccurate? In what way is it missleading, then, if you don't mind expanding on that.

[–]Buhandi 105 points106 points ago

I'll give you an example of misleading-but-accurate.

A description of Star Wars would say "Disaffected farm boy destroys military installation, killing thousands."

It's accurate, but entirely missing the plot of the movie, however it is you feel about the plot of the film. Personally, I think it cribbed from a lot of others, but go figure.

It's misleading for a number of reasons, but we can start with the lack of context. For example, if you took a tally of American and Japanese losses in World War II, it would make the Americans look just awful. I mean, not only did the Japanese lose hundreds of thousands more civilians, they also got two nukes dropped on them. Seems terrible, right? And in many ways, the devastating loss of life on both sides really is horrific- but it doesn't tell the whole story.

TL/DR: There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

[–]Niflheim 36 points37 points ago

I didn't know this was a game!

So the Palestinians are like the Mets?

[–]LordStradburry 83 points84 points ago

Looks like Israel is winning!!!

[–]cubsoon 32 points33 points ago

Looks like quite a pubstomp :(

[–]legendaryderp 12 points13 points ago

Why the fuck didn't you ban Anti-mage?

[–]CinLordOfGwynders 4 points5 points ago

I dunno man, that clutch hook from Pudge really put Israel far in the lead.

[–]Implacable_Porifera 3 points4 points ago

GG Hamas nob didn't ward, pls report

[–]yzyzyz 12 points13 points ago

This is neither /r/politics nor /r/worldnews. Please delete this post here and post it to the appropriate subreddit. Thanks.

[–]nickiter 66 points67 points ago

I think you meant to post this in another subreddit. /r/PropagandaPosters, perhaps.

[–]kidsneakers 49 points50 points ago

"May not receive outside help" isn't exactly true for the Palestinians--or at least Hamas.

[–]veidt_co 60 points61 points ago

Didn't you know that they build all of those long range rockets themselves, in a cave, with scraps? They're like Tony Stark.

/s because that seems to be be necessary here in r/politics part 2

[–]TomerMK 18 points19 points ago

Its not true for both Palestinians and the Hamas, Since the Palestinians are receiving all their supplies from power to food from Israel. While the Hamas receive all their funding and bombs from Muslim organisations in other countries. This propaganda picture is pure bullshit like every other propaganda picutre claiming only one side is suffering.

[–]protesilaus 176 points177 points ago

Palestinians kill Israelis? They're wrong.

Israelis kill Palestinians? They're wrong.

[–]vlrx 275 points276 points ago

Nazi's kill British? They're wrong. British kill Nazi's? They're wrong.

Over simplify complex situation? You're wrong.

[–]Qinella 165 points166 points ago

Apostrophe to pluralize Nazi? You're wrong!

[–]ohpuic 19 points20 points ago

Godwin's Law invoked. Fairly early in the discussion too.

[–]kingwolfos 7 points8 points ago

Invoking Godwin's Law at the beginning of a discussion? Priceless. There's some things proper argument can't buy. For everything else, there's hitler and the nazis.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]JRutterbush 9 points10 points ago

So, what exactly did Poland do wrong, in your opinion? Other than be a nation that somebody else wanted to own.

I freely admit that I don't know enough about the Palestine/Israel thing to weigh in on that conflict specifically. But stating that war only comes from everybody being wrong is just silly. War erupts just as often when one side wants what the other has, and the other side chooses to defend themselves.

Unless you count "Not rolling over and giving the aggressors what they want." as "wrong".

[–]counting_kittens 15 points16 points ago

I'm not sure what the allies could have done to prevent a war with Germany in WWII. I'd say they didn't fail at rightness.

[–]tonyjnel 26 points27 points ago

WWII could possibly have been prevented by not forcing such harsh terms on Germany after WWI. By valuing revenge over peace in the crafting of the Treaty of Versailles, the winners of WWI set the stage for Hitler's rise to power.

[–]sulejmankulenovic 6 points7 points ago

Drone strike on Hitler.

[–]donthavearealaccount 6 points7 points ago

You really think there is no situation where only one party can be "at fault" for a war?

Because I don't.

[–]Jaerdo 20 points21 points ago

Always love the Israel-Nazi comparison. If Israel was committing genocide do you think Gaza would still be there?

[–]TheTurkey5689 32 points33 points ago

You realize initially there was a two state solution, the palestinians called for aid from the surrounding countries to invade and destroy israel, and they failed, hence the current situation.

[–]RIPelliott 22 points23 points ago

This is absolutely wrong. You can kill and still be a victim, when you have no other choice.

[–]Dicyclomine 12 points13 points ago

Sigh... The middle east.

[–]deadeight 64 points65 points ago

Just like school, you never get in trouble for starting a fight you get in trouble for winning.

[–]IAmATriceratopsAMA 13 points14 points ago

In my school everyone involved in the fight got in trouble.

Fetal position in the corner while Charles kicks you in the stomach? That's a suspension. Running down the hall while Kevin throws baseballs at your head? That's a suspension. Getting knocked down the stairs after Bobby kicks you in the chest? That's a suspension.

You could sit there and take punches to the face and you'd get in the same amount of trouble as the guy who threw the punches.

[–]iratusamuru 3 points4 points ago

Zero tolerance baby, never made any sense from a progressive standpoint, never will.

It's an awfully good routine for getting people used to living in a police state, though.

[–]WhackAttack 23 points24 points ago

Let's ignore the bombings, missiles fired and the fact Hamas hides behind Palestinian civilians and accept this non-bias chart.

[–]phazor 19 points20 points ago

clueless topic poster

[–]Nohomobutimgay 4 points5 points ago

Is this UCSD?

[–]ipoopgreatness 36 points37 points ago

Well, shit. The Israelis should just give the Palestinians everything they want, and I'm sure there'll be peace and no more atrocities!

[–]rindindin 9 points10 points ago

r/worldnews is leaking again. Someone go patch it up please.

[–]jonnyclueless 39 points40 points ago

I always wanted someone to tell me how many Jews need to be killed before it's OK to retaliate. Apparently there is some kind of threshold. Let's look at the two sides.

One side uses precision guided weapons to target with minimal damage, phones in strikes and drops leaflets so that the civilians in the area have a chance to flee. They use early warning systems, bunkers, and missile defense systems to minimize casualties.

The other side indiscriminately fires weapons at civilian targets with no warnings. They intentionally launch their attacks from within civilian populations with the intent that their own people will get killed from any retaliation. They store their weapons and build their weapons plants in civilian areas knowing that any retaliation will result in explosions killing the surrounding civilians.

What those numbers don't show is who is responsible for the deaths. Most people just assume the deaths on the Palestinian side are caused by Israelis, which is far from the truth. Israel does not target children, Hamas does. Hamas uses children as human shields so that people who are already biased will look at these numbers and blame Israel for those deaths. These are the same people that force their kids to taunt soldiers in hopes of getting a photo of a soldier pushing a child. They make fake videos of people and children being wounded. One of the recent videos of a hurt child was a picture from Syria. It's too bad most people don't see this side. It's too bad most people don't want to because it's much easier to pretend this is a movie where the bad guys are the ones with more money and the good guys are the ones who are poor.

[–]nmosc89 144 points145 points ago

Of all the circlejerks and bandwagons on Reddit, the anti-Israel one has got to be one of the most ridiculous.

[–]SamWhite 38 points39 points ago

Considering the pro-Israel comments and upvotes are far more numerous in this thread, how do you figure that?

[–]downbound 3 points4 points ago

Or maybe there are more people on Reddit who do not support Israel than do. Not because of a bandwagon affect but because they actually researched the issue and have not been affected by Israeli propaganda.

[–]Spawnzer 20 points21 points ago

because an anti-israel post got 3.8k upvotes

Obviously most people posting in this thread are these who disagree with it, if you agree with the post you wont post in here unless you want to circlejerk, you'll upvote and keep going

[–]SamWhite 0 points1 point ago

Reddit obfuscates upvotes/downvotes on posts to defeat spammers, you can't take the numbers as absolutes. As to upvote and keep going

Of all the circlejerks

if you agree with the post you wont post in here unless you want to circlejerk

So are you saying people are circlejerking in here or not?

[–]esmith24 71 points72 points ago

agreed. i've been downvoted for condemning a confirmed terrorist as well. typical reddit.

[–]161719 -1 points0 points ago

Out of curiosity, which board certifies terrorists?

[–]Dayman10 39 points40 points ago

confirmed, not certified

[–]Marylandman101 5 points6 points ago

if your goal is to kill civillians, you might be a terrorist

[–]decatur8r 7 points8 points ago

Problem; Bear keeps kicking my ass.

Solution; Stop Poking bear with sharp stick.

[–]pretzelzetzel 20 points21 points ago

Perhaps "Children Dead" would be a more precise way to communicate that statistic.

[–]TheDentite 24 points25 points ago

Also a pie chart is always eye-catching.

[–]w00ten 45 points46 points ago

Palestine: Quit firing rockets at Israeli civilians and Israel won't bomb you, grow the fuck up.

Israel: Quit building illegal settlements in palestine and palestine might stop shooting rockets at you(I doubt it though), grow the fuck up.

[–]taranaki 8 points9 points ago

Hamas will never stop shooting rockets at Israel. Palistinians might, but Hamas wont

[–]ahanan 29 points30 points ago

A higher death toll on the Palestinian side does not mean the Israelis are more evil. It means Israel is successful in protecting its citizens and the terrorists (Hamas) are successful in using their own people as human shields so that they can turn a military loss into a propaganda win. The fact that I even have to write this means their strategy is working... do not let Hamas mislead you like this.

[–]Getternon 6 points7 points ago

Or its successful in its oppression.

[–]97nachotv 9 points10 points ago

So you mean the Palestinians have killed 1,444 children? Or the other way around?

[–]Khonan 8 points9 points ago

Jews have one rule: they are not allowed to use civilians/children as shields.

[–]jsinger1 41 points42 points ago

Ok.

Israel knows that Hamas, Hizbullah etc. will do whatever they want because the officials (UN, Anonymous, Reddit) will not call them out. They know that the only defense they have is their own defense.

Hamas knows that they get points for having more casualties than than Israel.

Israel, in contrast, actually wants to prevent casualties of its own citizens! Israel actually doesn't want to have casualties equal to its enemies in order to have a fair fight. In fact, Israel doesn't want a fair fight - it wants only fights that it can win.

Hamas has always stated that its objective will not be met until Israel ceases to exist.

The paramount reason for the existence of Israel is to provide Jews with the means to defend themselves, so the Israeli government is never going to agree to a course of action which gives up that option.

Hamas is in control. Hamas understands Israel's motivations and knows that it can force Israel to respond to it by attacking Israel's population. What this current situation is about is Hamas testing how much provocation it needs to get Israel going, then milking international outrage.

[–]technoleak 3 points4 points ago

So you're view is of a UN backed Hamas calling the shots over the weak and powerless Israel, who are only trying to protect their people?

I mean, you know your grip on reality is slipping when you claim the loss of Palestinian lives are viewed as a positive thing by Palestinians.

The way you've described things, it's as though Hamas is either: Fighting for the sake of fighting, getting pummeled in the process and not caring. or Fighting for more land, which would also be viewed as an ever failing effort because Palestine has done nothing but lose land over the last century.

You've laid out a scenario where the weaker side are the "aggressors", and it's an aggressor without a motive the way you've described it. If life were an action movie, then maybe your idea of some terrorist organization fighting for the sake of "evil" would pass, but amongst the educated, informed, and sensible, it's a joke.

Statistics and facts are far more meaningful than your empty rhetoric. Palestinian civilian casualties far outnumber those of Israeli Civilians. In addition to this, Palestine is being illegally occupied, and is constantly losing land. Add to that these people are deprived of food, water and other necessities, and you have very clear image of oppression.

Your claim that Israel is morally superior doesn't make Palestinian civilians less dead, or hungry.

[–]tidux 3 points4 points ago

I'm pretty sure the reason Hamas doesn't ignore UN resolutions is that the UN doesn't recognize that they exist as a country.

[–]Dat_Redox 20 points21 points ago

When Palestine puts down its arms, there will be no more war. When Israel puts down its arms, there will be no more Israel.

[–]wakka13 7 points8 points ago

Things like this is why I avoid walking through here if possible (Library Walk, UC San Diego)

[–]seanjuro 55 points56 points ago

Number of flyers air dropped over opponent warning civilians to stay clear of certain areas and militants in order to insure asittle casualties as possible 0 Palestine 1,000,000< israel

[–]karmaceutical 40 points41 points ago

how exactly would hamas fly over israel? they dont exactly have planes.

[–]Blufalcon94 13 points14 points ago

Israels military also calls houses and tells them that there will be an attack in their area and they should probably leave. Planes aren't the only option.

[–]seanjuro 3 points4 points ago

My point was they purposely target civilians. Also they have drones Israel shot one down over tel aviv.

[–]TomerMK 19 points20 points ago

Even if they would have planes they will just use them to crash into buildings. The Hammas are aiming at Israeli civilians and they are not afraid to admit it. Their sole purpose is to kill all Jews and obtain Israel and make it into a Muslim country.

[–]backelie 3 points4 points ago

Oh, they sent flyers, that makes it alright then!

[–]screampuff 3 points4 points ago

I'd rather have flyers drop to tell me my neighbourhood is going to be bombed over having a rocket aimlessly launched at my city, with sirens to warn me 15 seconds before it will randomly impact.

[–]intoto 109 points110 points ago

Rockets launched into the other's territory this year before November 13th:

Palestine Israel
800+ 0

[–]ActuallyATree 180 points181 points ago

That would be because the Israelis prefer to use artillery.

[–]thatfilthyfive 21 points22 points ago

You mean that statistic is misleading?!?!

[–]ugottoknowme2 88 points89 points ago

Don't forget the airstrikes!

[–]myoffe 12 points13 points ago

not forgetting - zero

[–]TremendousPete 12 points13 points ago

Nah man, when a HELICOPTER shoots the missile it doesn't count as Israel anymore.

[–]pez319 9 points10 points ago

What type of rockets does Palestine use? I would think that if Israel responded with the same number of rockets they would wipe out Palestine.

[–]PostalPenguin 25 points26 points ago

Not just rockets, unguided rockets.

[–]accountnumber499 60 points61 points ago

Also,

Civilians purposely killed:

Palestine: 124

Israel: 0

And yes, I'm sure you can post many an article showing Israel hitting schools etc but this isn't their aim - the amount of international backlash against Israel is directly proportional to the number of civilians they kill. Israel is trying to destroy the infrastructure enabling Palestine to attack them.

Palestine on the other hand has absolutely no ability to control who they hit - which is as good as saying they don't care.

edit: formatting and clarity

[–]TheDentite 5 points6 points ago

Why didn't they put this part into the sign?

[–]Knov 15 points16 points ago

Look guys, I think we can both agree that Israel and Palestine both have pretty horrible governments/military forces.

[–]IDFguy 17 points18 points ago

Israel has been performing hundreds of airstrikes the last few days with precision no other country has, even though Hamas purposefully uses civilian areas as weapon caches and firing sites. One tactic is warning civilians to leave the area several times before they attack. This is why there have (regrettably) only been 13 casualties, as opposed to the thousands we have seen from other countries such as in Iraq/Afghanistan.

Israel is lauded by military leaders for their restraint and precision regarding its military operations. Stop putting Israel on a pedestal above all other countries, it makes you look ridiculous.

[–]lolrsk8s_3 37 points38 points ago

Yes. Hamas, a misogynistic, homophobic, theocratic, dictatorial, Islamist gang of thugs is the same as the Israeli government.

Not everything is morally equivalent.

[–]svsvsvs 34 points35 points ago

That one toilet is overflowing with diarrhea doesn't make the other one not clogged with shit.

[–]Hensah 6 points7 points ago

Do you have any idea how many arrows the indigenous peoples of America fired at the European settlers?

What villains!

You crazy, sick, mother fucking asshole.

[–]Rambo_11 11 points12 points ago

This picture is so statistically incorrect I want to cry.

[–]DeFex 7 points8 points ago

You can tell by "children killed" but not "people killed" This is meant to emotionally manipulate the soft headed.

[–]thepriestofhiroshima 7 points8 points ago

If your family and friends were at the mercy of indiscriminately fired rockets, you armchair moralists would change your tune. Criticism of Israeli settlement policy is all well and good, but you lot are just repeating Palestinian rhetoric now.

[–]Jaroids 5 points6 points ago

I'm going to piss off a lot of sympathizers with this, but I feel like somebody needs to point this out. Israel has never declared genocide on another nation. Israel has never rejected the statehood of another nation. Israel has never declared a holy war against another nation. Israel has simply existed for almost 70 years against all odds. Naysayers will claim it is only with the support of the US, but America has never been involved in an Israeli conflict. Israel defends itself, and always has against incomprehensible odds. I don't care if you agree with me, I just think it's something worth considering.

[–]PeteIRL 1 point2 points ago

Israel has illegally occupied the land of another nation and displaced and made refugees of the majority of it's inhabitants. I think that's worth considering.

[–]netraven5000 2 points3 points ago

Are those the numbers of people killed/imprisoned/injured by that country or from that country?

[–]GhostChronos -1 points0 points ago

and what about 'cats killed'? there would be a world war for sure

[–]AngryGiraffe 2 points3 points ago

I should probably know this, but what pertains to what here? I took this to be each nation's "score," but I'm wondering if it means losses? Like, has Palestine killed 1,444 children, or LOST 1,444 children? I read it to mean the number under the flag is what that nation has done, not had done to them.

Would this mean Palestine killed 1500 children without violating resolutions?

[–]pete1729 2 points3 points ago

Could we designate an area or just quarantine a region and let them fight it out? Could we set up a perimeter, give safe passage and refuge to those who do not wish to fight, and arm those who do? Then all the people who need to kill each other could just do so in peace.

[–]Hellscreamgold 0 points1 point ago

wonder how many of those "children" were human shields....ya know, because Hamas does stuff like that.

[–]mccaddensa16 0 points1 point ago

I've been seeing an increasing amount of Israel vs. Palestine conflict in Reddit lately, and I'm not entirely sure why.

It seems to me that Reddit is being used to convey a political message, and it is emanating mainly from one side. This really should stop.

[–]Zachary9 0 points1 point ago

Looks like palestinians suck...

[–]sklepner 1 point2 points ago

"If Palestine put down their weapons there would be peace If Israel put down their weapons there would be no more Israel" -Benjamin Netanyahu

Both side are guilty of committing terrible things but the fact still remains that Israel is surrounded by at least 7 countries that would wipe Israel from the map given the chance .

[–]mashedtaters67 2 points3 points ago

I like the part where these numbers literally aren't true.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]ref498 3 points4 points ago

Wanna know the truth? They'r both in the wrong.

[–]robstach 4 points5 points ago

If Mexico started shooting missiles at the US the score would even be greater

[–]Inquisitor1 3 points4 points ago

Literally hitler.

[–]Marylandman101 4 points5 points ago

I'm actually surprised at all the condemnation of the misleading picture, this is reddit after all, where I got downvoted for saying Hamas is bad cause they fire rockets at schools.

[–]brotherwayne 7 points8 points ago

Can anyone explain why the UN doesn't get in the middle of this? We/they intervened in Bosnia. To be fair, that was on the way to genocide I hear but this thing doesn't seem to be on the way to resolution any other way.

Edit: downvoted apparently because how dare you ask a question. da fuq

[–]guynamedjames 21 points22 points ago

The UN can only get involved if the security council approves it to. The US and several other states in the security council with veto power would never approve of this, largely because they agree with Israel on most, if not all of its handling of Palestine

[–]brendax 14 points15 points ago

Because the UN security council recognizes Israel's claimed right to defend it's civilians via these military operations.

[–]brotherwayne 5 points6 points ago

But doesn't recognize Palestine's right to do... anything apparently.

[–]brendax 7 points8 points ago

No, as far as the UN security council is concerned, Palestine does not have the right to do anything.

Sure we went into Bosnia, but we didn't go into Congo, or Darfur. Bosnia was not a sovereign state (before you yell at me, according to the UN) exercising it's right (according to UN) to defend itself.

You asked to be explained why the UN doesn't intervene, you didn't ask to be agreed with.

[–]cercant01 2 points3 points ago

Wildly distorted and doesn't help. Better story would focus on why Arabs hate Jews so much and have done so since long before the creation of the state of Israel. Israel could completely withdraw and it wouldn't be good enough. Palestinians need to learn that coexistence and economic cooperation would make the entire region happy and prosperous for everyone. Crazed religious fanaticism on both sides doesn't help matters either.

[–]seanjuro 13 points14 points ago

Rockets fired without cause since 2004 100,000 Palestine 0 Israel. Suicide bombings 300< Palestine Israel 0.

[–]terpsnfins333 4 points5 points ago

This is completely untrue. Not saying either party is 100% in the right but when you have a group of savages fire rockets at you there is a need to protect yourself....do some research before you side with extremists who attempted to destroy your own country