this post was submitted on
1,695 points (53% like it)
14,452 up votes 12,757 down votes

funny

subscribe2,715,477 readers

7,019 users here now


Results of the facebook poll


Reminder: Political posts are not permitted in /r/funny. Try /r/PoliticalHumor instead!


NEW! No gore or porn (including sexually graphic images). Other NSFW content must be tagged as such


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress. Try /r/politicalhumor instead.

  • Rage comics - Go to /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 412

[–]sushi_addict 128 points129 points ago

He will learn to love naps in time

[–]Basscsa 59 points60 points ago

Why is Bill Hicks an unknown while Denis Leary is a household name?

Because there's no cure for cancer.

[–]Eminence120 10 points11 points ago

Bill Hicks is unknown?

[–]ForeverTied_hubby 28 points29 points ago

Because Bill Hicks didn't have a 7 season hit TV show

[–]aPigWhoWontEatJews 12 points13 points ago

Leary was famous for a pretty long time before that.

[–]ForeverTied_hubby 1 point2 points ago

He's been famous off and on yeah. His fame spiked with his roast, and then massively with his show. In-between, not so much.

[–]MasterAardwolf 2 points3 points ago

Who's Dennis Leary?

[–]Fhajad 4 points5 points ago

I like how you hijacked the top comment to do a Hicks vs Leary circlejerk.

[–]gwolf100 -2 points-1 points ago

I'm gonna go with the fact that Hick's comedy really hasn't aged well. There was a routine he did on Letterman that got pulled and Dave played it many years later, it was just needlessly homophobic. I mean Eddie Murphy's stuff from the 80's is kinda bordering on homophobic but it's still funny in the way he does it. Hicks is just plain offensive

[–]RedAnarchist 16 points17 points ago

Not sure I agree with any of that..

That bit there is over 20 years old.

Other topics Bill loved to talk about was religion in politics, drugs and our inane drug laws, consumerism and advertising, money in politics, the dumbing down of the American public through media, and of course eating pussy.

I'd say not only has his material has aged perfectly, but it's even more relevant today.

[–]Im_more_ignorant 3 points4 points ago

I once was at a comedy club with some friends and this guy went up and started talking about smoking marijuana. Then his belief that it should be legal. Then he went on to how gay marriage should be legal.

Now this was open mic night, so you don't expect everyone to be funny, but this guy was not funny. He was just using the same old ironic and/or smartass arguments that we all know. It just wasn't funny, even though I agree with him on making such things legal.

My point is, just because you agree with someone (in this case, that the war in Iraq was not such a good thing) that doesn't automatically make them funny.

I've never not laughed so hard as I did while watching that video. Bill Hicks just doesn't make me laugh. I understand why some Redditors agree with him philosophically, but holy crap is he not funny.

[–]RedAnarchist 3 points4 points ago

Congrats?

[–]MrShittyFatTits 4 points5 points ago

I love Hicks, absolutely love him and his body of work, but his homophobic material makes me cringe every time I hear it. One particularly moronic bit that I wish I could just erase from history on the Sane Man DVD:

"If money had a dick, George Michaels would be a flaming faggot."

Man I hate that line.

[–]Fmloop 6 points7 points ago

What homophobic material?

[–]thepoonies 2 points3 points ago

Bill Hicks was not a homophobe.

[–]MrShittyFatTits 1 point2 points ago

Yeah I don't think he is. I think it's just a product of the times that informs his speech, his real casual attitude about calling gay men faggots. I probably shouldn't have said "homophobic material", it's just his choice of words in certain bits.

"I'd get so drunk, and then drive, that when I got pulled over by the cops I'd think I made it to another club. 'Hey what is this, a leather bar? Hey hey hey, I'm not into this you faggots!"

[–]ForeverTied_hubby 1 point2 points ago

So what you're really saying is that some of what Bill Hicks says offends you. Bill Hicks spits in the face of PC, and yet you say you love Hicks. Up until he crosses a line you have.

[–]drinkit_or_wearit 0 points1 point ago

pepsi

[–]paulbesteves 0 points1 point ago

Anyone have a link to this?

[–]hazie 0 points1 point ago

Letterman made a specific mention of how relevant that joke remained today and how well his comedy's aged.

[–]blaghart 1 point2 points ago

Dude Murphy's 80s stuff is horrible. Tight shiny orange pants and his openning line is "Got to keep moving because I don't know which row the fags are in, don't want them looking at my ass all night"

[–]therealflinchy 0 points1 point ago

my god...NAPS.

[–]VestaDear 0 points1 point ago

I never did. Naps for me as an adult mean I have the flu or I am working too hard and I need to stop that.

[–]cuteman 0 points1 point ago

As an adult I wish I got more naps. A piece of advice for that kid: enjoy it while you can!!

[–]paradox-man 52 points53 points ago

Then how did the first racists come to be?

[–]Yowomboo 25 points26 points ago

Aliens.

[–]darwin2500 5 points6 points ago

One tribe stole some cattle from another tribe; they happened to be of different races.

[–]JesterAzazel -1 points0 points ago

Well they weren't taught to discriminate the entire tribe because of what some of them did. They were born with that mindset.

We're born with a lot of bad traits. That's why we actually have to raise our kids right or they don't turn out right. You don't just let them grow up and make their own decisions.

[–]ueptvoovtpeu 5 points6 points ago

It's a protective mechanism, the nature of humans is tribal. To form alliances and bonds and to stick with those closest to you. Recently the internet has opened up a new dynamic of narcissists who befriend everyone who has something that may benefit them.. aka "networking".

Racism is learned.. and can be learned through suggestions, experience, or direct teaching or observation of the ideals being presented in a beneficial way. I know african americans that are more racist towards their own race than you could ever imagine. And it's not towards ALL of them, just a specific, easy to identify segment of that population.

This is why we are 50 states and not just one big state/country. We are divided by different tribal ideals which is why to retain those rights and to retain democracy we must protect the state rights especially the right to nullification.

We also really need a new voting system. Electoral college winner take all is not right.

[–]ugly_people_are_ugly 14 points15 points ago

"I think if I can convince everybody to hate <colour> people, I might be able to gain something"

[–]ghazi364 3 points4 points ago

So why do races tend to prefer their own? Racial hatred is one thing, but it's not like it wasn't a natural inevitability. This is like, so deeply researched in community psychology.

[–]MasterAardwolf 0 points1 point ago

Actually that isn't entirely true. There are a number of studies which show (in terms of sexual desire) that black men prefer white women, and white men prefer Asian women.

[–]ghazi364 0 points1 point ago

That's partially social, as I don't recall stories of 4th century africans trying to abduct white women, for example. More accurately, that's a product of modern globalization, not ingroup/outgroup natural tendencies.

[–]Incongruity7 0 points1 point ago

Ah yes, the elusive "number of studies" that is often referenced but rarely linked to.

[–]Lord_Purple_ 3 points4 points ago

Fear is not the friend of rationality, but that which is different is very much a friend to fear.

[–]aPigWhoWontEatJews 2 points3 points ago

Tribalism.

Source: I'm not an anthropologist.

[–]findingchemo 3 points4 points ago

That's a paradox, man.

[–]larrycatz 168 points169 points ago

From an evolutionary standpoint humans have, from birth, a natural inclination to be more altruistic towards people who look like they do (more traditionally, towards people who look like people in their tribe). I don't know if there is evidence regarding ill-will towards people who are different. Maybe someone else knows more on that side?

[–]glassescontacts 12 points13 points ago

When I was a little kid (maybe 8 or 9) there was a lady that went to my church that had two children with downs syndrome. I told myself that I hated them because of their stupid faces. I never interacted with these people, nor would I have said anything to them, but I just didn't like their faces. It is absolutely horrible thinking back on it. I was certainly never taught to not like people with downs syndrome.

[–]darwin2500 92 points93 points ago

Humans have inherent in-group out-group behaviors, but they're based on learned social groupings, not appearance.

[–]joeblessyou 17 points18 points ago

Yeah, I would think this too. A kid can be taught his group is multicultural pretty easily.

[–]svenhoek86 6 points7 points ago

I knew racism existed, but up until late middle school I had never really experienced it, even living in the South.

[–]rasta_lion 0 points1 point ago

I always understood that they were different and I thought that was weird. I wasn't taught to think they were weird, it's just that different made me uncomfortable. I couldn't help it and I'm not that way anymore, obviously

[–]Scottama 2 points3 points ago

Yeah, that's fine, but then it's the multiculturalism that's taught. Own-race bias (i.e. "They all look the same to me") is found across all cultures (as would probably be expected), and 30 years' of research has found that interracial contact only accounts for 2% of the variance in ORB, which would certainly suggest - again unsurprisingly - that we are evolutionarily adapted to be better able to distinguish individual members of our in-group, as opposed to an amorphous "them".

[–]Poonchow 3 points4 points ago

Until I was about seven and started reading a lot, I had no idea what racism was. I'm white and had black kids in my school classes and had met them and interacted and stuff, heard people talk, didn't know what the fuck people were talking about with racism. I could physically see these people were different and talked different but I couldn't fathom how it mattered and what the big deal was. I heard people preaching about equality, talked about embarrassing stories, read things in books, and suddenly I started to connect the dots. It was such an epiphany moment for me as a child that it sticks with me today, and I still try to fight it, because it pisses me off that I can't appreciate a brown person who is better than me without being labelled "white guilty" or punish an idiot for being an idiot without fear of being called a racist. The whole paradigm brings us down and prevents us from being honest with each other, and I hate that.

[–]CockyRhodes 2 points3 points ago

I'm not comfortable in non-mixed groups.

[–]kelustu 2 points3 points ago

I went to a school with nothing but white kids until about 7th grade. Then there was two asians, an indian and a few latino kids. The first black kid showed up to the school in 9th grade and he was a horrible, awful person to me. I hate to admit it, but I was definitely at least a little bit racist for a few years through high school.

[–]jomarox -1 points0 points ago

Maybe he was a dick to you because he's been oppressed by white people his entire life. It's a reciprocal interaction and in my opinion racism will never end a long as people are making generalizations based on experiences.

[–]kezeran -1 points0 points ago

If people accept racism them doesnt that obliterate the meaning of it? If no one cares no one is offended right?

[–]gametavern -1 points0 points ago

That's a very entertaining story, but real detectives have to worry about a thing called....evidence.

[–]K1N6F15H 14 points15 points ago

You asked, and so I am here:

Firstly, we know that racism is a real thing even to people who claim not to be racist, it comes out in the benign inability to determine the difference between members of unfamiliar races.

In some studies, cross-racial identification success drops by 70% which explains why minorities in the U.S. have a hard time on lineups, they can be easily mistaken for other members of their race. Additionally, this creates major problems when determining facial displays of emotions between races (this is just one study, there are many others with varied results).

In terms of child development, it appears that between nine months and two years is when children begin to have difficulty determining facial cues based on race.

All of these studies are not pointing to innate differences within races but the inclination, as you mentioned, that we form connections with others from birth. This isn't however because members of our community look like ourselves but because we are accustomed to their appearances. In summary, the best way to stop racist inclinations, even in their most benign forms, it to expose children to a diverse group of people at an early age.

EDIT: By "racism is a real thing," I mean that it is not simply a socialized hatred reinforced by our racist parents.

[–]anonemouse2010 7 points8 points ago

it comes out in the benign inability to determine the difference between members of unfamiliar races.

That's most certainly not racism.

[–]NotaMethAddict 5 points6 points ago

Yes, that post isn't accurate. People form biases based on bad/good experiences they've had with types of groups/people. His son hates naps because he has had bad experiences with them. Racism is a natural tendency of humans.

[–]SukonMatic 3 points4 points ago

[–]davy_crockett 50 points51 points ago

If you want a real answer, it's because "ought" can never come from "is." Evolution, and science in general, is descriptive in that it seeks to describe the world as it is.

When you justify something in the sense Philosoraptor is using it, you are making a prescriptive judgement about what ought to be - right and wrong.

Nature cannot provide ought, only is. If chimps "naturally" engage in clan-on-clan infanticide and rape, that of course does not make it right. If evolution is a partial cause of racism, that does not make it right.

[–]jimcrator 2 points3 points ago

If you want a real answer, it's because "ought" can never come from "is." Evolution, and science in general, is descriptive in that it seeks to describe the world as it is.

Dennis Leary is making a positive "is" statement, not a normative "ought" statement.

[–]davy_crockett 2 points3 points ago

Yes, I agree. I was responding to the image macro, which seemed to think that a "justification" of racism was being made.

[–]jimcrator 1 point2 points ago

Since sukonmatic is replying to larrycatz, I've interpreted his use of justification as: "a statement in explanation of some action or belief".

http://definr.com/justification

When the meaning is ambiguous, I find that it is important to be charitable in my interpretation.

[–]obey_giant 0 points1 point ago

And on the same merit...

If chimps "naturally" engage in clan-on-clan infanticide and rape, that of course does not make it wrong. If evolution is a partial cause of racism, that does not make it wrong.

Hume's guillotine works both ways.

[–]StonedSamurai 18 points19 points ago

Let's just say that racism is hard wired into us genetically to some degree, big or small. Why would that mean racism is justified?

There's a shitton of behaviors that all animals are born with that are terrible. Dolphins rape, cats murder, why are humans born any different? So even if someone is born racist, that doesn't give him an excuse to be racist.

[–]in_vitro 6 points7 points ago

ehhhh, I'd be careful with that idea. Being born that way is used by the homosexual community to make a point that they aren't "choosing" to be that way and therefore can't be "fixed". I don't think people are born racist. I think they are born to stereotype or be mindful of unfamiliar things or events as a survival mechanism. Unfortunately this is applied to cultures and groups of people although I wouldn't necessarily call that outright racism. It's when people take it to the point of irrational hate that they become racist in the infamous sense.

[–]Notblackandwhite 2 points3 points ago

We are all born with different tendencies that we can't get rid of. We, as a society, decide which of these are bad or good. We have decided that rape and murder are bad and have outlawed them regardless of how much a person desires to do so. We are still unsure of homosexuality though we are leaning closer to acceptance. Just because we are born with something doesn't make it bad or good. It simply is, we then decide whether to continue it. The argument that the homosexual community uses when discussing how they are born that way makes sense because they are defending against the claim of a lifestyle choice, rather this is just who they are. Everyone has racist tendencies, but our society has informed us that it is wrong to act on them, whether or not you agree we are forced to act in such a way

[–]oh_herro_dere 2 points3 points ago

It's not really murder if it isn't the same species.

[–]Lord_Purple_ 0 points1 point ago

Because proper use of science is not synonymous with morality.

[–]justdowhatitellyou 0 points1 point ago

Well I don't think we can assume that altruism toward similar people translates into dislike of different people, necessarily. We may be naturally more inclined to hang with people that share our physical traits, but I don't think racism is what we naturally save for everyone else. But then I'm no biologist, maybe there is a "racism" gene.

[–]Urban_Savage 1 point2 points ago

If you hang only with people who are like you, then everything else will remain and unknown, and we fear the unknown. We fear outside groups and their strange customs because we are only comfortable in groups of individuals who are similar to us. That fear and distrust is the beginning of racism.

[–]Beaverkiller2004 2 points3 points ago

Mexican here. I do not like other Mexicans

[–]beebeedoom 8 points9 points ago

Don't worry, we hate you too.

[–]i_ejaculate_fire 2 points3 points ago

Seriously. We should support each other, you asshole! ( Beaverkiller2004).

[–]Randomacts -1 points0 points ago

Not even the food?

I love their food..

[–]CobraStallone 0 points1 point ago

Chinga tu madre.

[–]silent_p 0 points1 point ago

But... wouldn't we evolve to accept and live with the things around us? Well, okay, we'd learn to tolerate things that were different from us so long as our ecosystem was in balance and we all benefit from one another. But if something got out of balance, obviously we would begin to blame one group or another for the effects of the imbalance that we experience. Increased unrest, or poor environmental conditions, or whatever. Clear oppression.

I don't know, it seems a successful evolving biosphere would have to change their feelings toward other iterations of the original cell fairly frequently in order for the biosphere as a whole to continue to survive.

[–]whiteychs 0 points1 point ago

Evolution isn't about harmony. It's natural selection and the most adapted to the current environment has the best chance of continuing to produce. It's a giant genetic competition.

[–]silent_p 0 points1 point ago

Well, yeah, but everything's competing with everything else. Everything is working to perpetuate its own genes the furthest to an equal level, because everything that fails to adapt and compete will die off. So I think we could consider all biomass on Earth as a single entity, with a communal purpose: to increase the efficiency and well-being of Earth as a whole. To achieve a state where everything is in balance, and everyone gets what they want.

Or perhaps to achieve optimal computational density of matter in the reachable universe.

[–]oxemoron 1 point2 points ago

There was a big claim that children with autism were altruistic towards those of a different race a few years ago. I think that was proven false, but there have been some similar studies with other disabilities that affect how the brain functions. A quick google came up with this which talks about it. (Sorry for linking a blog, I am lazy)
The point is, the only people that don't experience a self-preserving form of latent prejudice are people whose brains aren't wired the same way as most other people.

I just remembered this is in response to a joke in /r/funny, and is maybe getting too bleak. Oh well, fuck it.

[–]Jabuuty671 1 point2 points ago

How would they have known what they looked like? I'm sure they didn't see from third-person or carried a mirror around everywhere. It's based around cultural (geographic) and social factors.

[–]pets_are_unimportant 1 point2 points ago

I don't know if there is evidence regarding ill-will towards people who are different. Maybe someone else knows more on that side?

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not... Do anecdotes from minorities count as evidence?

[–]larrycatz 0 points1 point ago

No because all of those accounts occur at a point when socially taught behavior has made any relationship spurious. Unless you have negative anecdotes from minorities claiming infants as their perpetrator?

[–]Gabbergeddez 62 points63 points ago

I can't take any of denis learys' stuff with merit after he completely ripped off bill hicks.

[–]ProfessorDuncan 8 points9 points ago

Could you explain please? Never heard of this.

[–]Indeaux 16 points17 points ago

[–]Xx420xcirclejerker69 4 points5 points ago

not available on mobile

Well it didn't want to know anyways...

[–]ProfessorDuncan 2 points3 points ago

Denis Leary is a human repost.

[–]Sprinklez0602 22 points23 points ago

Was waiting for someone to mention this. Dennis Leary lost all of my respect after learning that.

[–]CallMeMoo 10 points11 points ago

Seriously. Fuck that guy.

[–]mystery_smelly_feet 30 points31 points ago

I'm going to go against the grain here and say that, while Leary does have some similar material, I do not think he stole Hicks' persona. Leary has a pretty distinct, hyper, rant-like routine that Hicks did not have. Hicks definitely had his rants, but so does any "angry" comedian. I would say Leary is more in the "inspired" territory when it comes to Hicks.

[–]fireguy286 6 points7 points ago

I'm with you. This Denis Leary is a Bill Hicks hack is old. Frankly they're both Carlin hacks in my book and mediocre at best. So they had some material with similar roots? Ok? The jokes were not the same at all, nor was their delivery. If you want to talk thieves stick to Mencia and Dane Cook.

[–]hazie 3 points4 points ago

Both doing jokes about a nobody, Jim Ficks, dying of a heart-attack while jogging. Come on. You can't seriously think that shit is just coincidence. Leary's a thief. Back in their day, Leary was regarded in much the same way as Mencia and Cook.

[–]BurgerFriesBeer 4 points5 points ago

Jim Ficks was not a nobody back in the day. Anybody who grew up in the 60s and 70s knew who he was because he was some running guru. Hell, my pop has never jogged a day in his life and he mentions Jim Ficks from time to time.

[–]TheShader 0 points1 point ago

Pretty much. It's just a joke that shows the age of the comedians, and the time period they're from. It's like saying Jon Stewart rips off Lewis Black because they both have George Bush jokes.

[–]FreelanceAsshole 3 points4 points ago

Leary sucks. He obviously ripped off many of hicks jokes. Some comparisons for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INarE1WraFA

[–]Popsumpot 9 points10 points ago

also Louis C.K. and a whole bunch of other people.

[–]deadbunny 2 points3 points ago

[–]The_Dane 1 point2 points ago

Wow. Fuck Dennis Leary.

[–]Slippery_Slope_Guy 1 point2 points ago

Haha, I knew this would be from O&A as soon as I saw the link. Any fan of Louie CK should check out that show. Louie was on yesterday actually. Had some great boat stories.

[–]faithnomour 2 points3 points ago

The punchlines are usually different.

[–]TheReverend5 5 points6 points ago

The really sad part is how people still jump to defend Denis Leary's blatant plagiarism.

[–]BiscuitsandHam 1 point2 points ago

when did this happen? not trying to say your lying, i would just like to see a source

[–]sachspie 2 points3 points ago

[–]Apostolate 20 points21 points ago

Relevant subreddit = /r/standupshots.

[–]trunicated 1 point2 points ago

I've found that I like these images, and enjoy browsing /r/standupshots to find them. I've also found that seeing them in /r/funny infuriates me to no end.

I guess what I need to do is find all the non-default subreddits that people steal crap from for that delicious /r/funny karma, and just subscribe to those instead.

Since you're around here all the time, care to toss a few my way (that aren't on the sidebar!)?

[–]witty_account_name 0 points1 point ago

aaaaaaaand it's real folks. All I can say is thank god for reddit's the age verification page

[–]NuclearPotatoes 0 points1 point ago

I..

[–]ittakesacrane 0 points1 point ago

...have the weirdest boner right now

[–]nickpinkk 3 points4 points ago

pro tip: when searching for enlightening perspectives on race or gender, pick almost any other source than Reddit.

[–]Warlizard 27 points28 points ago

Except it's not true. My wife and I have never said a single thing negative about ANY race and when we were interviewing nannies, my oldest son (he was 6 at the time) said, "I don't like the people with brown skin."

"Huh?", I said. "Why not?"

"I don't know. I just don't like them. I like our color skin better."

That isn't taught. That's just inside. We have to work to make sure that we overcome that instinct, the feeling that different is dangerous.

EDIT: Since people aren't reading the comments below and are pointing out that school, TV, etc., are big factors, here's the post I wrote explaining why those things weren't issues: http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/12vuhy/he_knows_whats_up/c6yktdp

[–]agaybabby 115 points116 points ago

Maybe you should recognise that you and your wife aren't the only vehicles of information for your son?

[–]Dollars4Derek 0 points1 point ago

Perhaps that's it, maybe not. I remember being in preschool and I didn't want to play with the dark skinned kids because, well, they looked different than me. Between my children's shows and movies I have no clue how I ever had racist tendencies then. I think part of it is just this primal sense to stick to what looks like us. I'm glad that didn't last for me past preschool though.

[–]thatkindofhighguy 10 points11 points ago

And also realize that being over politically correct can actually be a sign of being racist. Think the anti-gays that are closet homos.

Yes I'm bigoted and prejudice, I act against my instincts and do the right, honorable and fair thing. If I don't know I'm bigoted and prejudice, how am I supposed to act against it? Magic?

Me and my Japanese coworker frequently listen to comedy radio. Do you know who's crying of laughter at racist jokes told about Asians? Yeah, him! Do you know who laughs most at black jokes? Um the black guy! I'm the guy who laughs my ass off at the Asian comedians that make fun of white people.

Maybe if the parents didn't tense up around minorities their kid wouldn't end up racist. You know who doesn't get tense around Indian nannies? Me! Cause I can't find a competent white doctor, but I can find plenty of good indian ones. So why the fuck wouldn't you want an Indian taking care of your kids? Probably do a better job than the lazy ass white chicks. Who cares if they end up speaking Hindi too.

[–]adamgram 8 points9 points ago

hmm... a few things are possible, the most likely being a) your kid learned it in school or on TV or b) the kid was just comparing nannies the same way he decides on which hat to wear, not realizing skin color = race.

[–]Ijustlostmyjengajam 1 point2 points ago

I was the opposite as a kid. I wanted to be friends with the black kid in class cause I thought they seemed cool. So your anecdote against mine.

[–]PksRevenge 4 points5 points ago

I read something not long ago about how instinctively we tend to group with other people like us. The study had found that kids with autism didn't have this instinct, sort of interesting.

[–]lalondtm 2 points3 points ago

lol are you telling me your 6 year old has never left your house, watched TV, used the internet or had any form of communication with anybody but you?

[–]captureMMstature 0 points1 point ago

Used the Internet? 6 year olds use the Internet now?

[–]h4terade 0 points1 point ago

I agree with you. It's not hard to naturally dislike a certain group of people. It can be a learned behavior through experience. If your kid goes to school in an area like I went to school, then perhaps his experience with the brown skin folks involve loud, obnoxious people that disrupt class more than the other color kids. Maybe one can learn to not like the way they talk, or act. Always having to loan out a puncil and paper and never get it back.

[–]b0mb 3 points4 points ago

That's bad and everything Denis Leary has done is bad.

[–]SaintKnowLa 7 points8 points ago

Racism is not taught. It is learned.

[–]seafoamstratocaster 5 points6 points ago

Or it could just develop from interactions with certain races.

[–]bonzo48280 0 points1 point ago

Bill Hicks probably told him this joke at a bar.

[–]Kinomi -1 points0 points ago

False. Racism is learned, I learned to be racist by the people in my area being the most stereotypical annoying N-words, it's made me racist in the sense that I assume every black person will now act like those I grew up around

[–]ImHereToRuinReddit 1 point2 points ago

Or because it has nothing to do with parenting instead it is the media and real life events because we live in a time where black people in cities walk around cities and play games amongst themselves were they jump and maim young defenseless white kids, there was a story on reddit posted a few days ago and i knew a kid in high school who was jumped by six black kids and is to this day still wearing braces... so maybe thats why you know? becasue they have a bunch of fuck ups... in mass number

[–]dxrebirth 0 points1 point ago

You spelled that wrong.

[–]rbcrusaders 0 points1 point ago

I never got this argument. Couldn't it sometimes be learned? It doesn't have to be taught as an ideology.

[–]khanfusion 1 point2 points ago

This is an all star of reposts. Plus, stolen joke.

[–]rayAstone -1 points0 points ago

Leary for Governor of New York

[–]Deathalicious 0 points1 point ago

For our kid it's baths. You'd think we were dipping him in boiling oil the way he screams.

[–]saucemachine -1 points0 points ago

I once held dennis leary's underwear AMA

[–]jimcrator 2 points3 points ago

Actually, one strong hypothesis is that xenophobia is evolutionary.

[–]Dreamer101 -2 points-1 points ago

REPOST. I repeat, this IS a repost.

[–]Snakeoilsage 0 points1 point ago

Eh, it's all about tribal psychology. If a little white kid grows up feeling that a black kid is his friend, he'll be more inclined to trust other black people. Deprive him of that contact, and he won't necessarily hate them, but he'll have no reason to trust him and consider him and outsider.

But the same is true for anyone you meet, really. The skin color issue is just an obvious visual trait that our sight-based instincts focus on.

[–]tythompson -1 points0 points ago

Reposts know whats up

[–]p_U_c_K 1 point2 points ago

I would say that, though, this isn't the entire story. If you grow up in a diverse neighborhood, you can come to your own conclusions as you experience groups of people. It's not solely people in the exurban areas hating people they don't meet.

For example, I went to middle school from 2nd -8th grade in school where I was a minority (as a white kid). There were tons of other white kids who hated black kids and asian (hmong) kids. I understood why, but didn't really mind because they left me alone. They talked a lot of shit to us and bullied a lot of kids, while every one of them didn't, it created a weird us vs. them thing in 4th grade. I remember in 6th grade there was a small brave heart esque race battle in the big field behind our school, the hmong vice lords sharpened up these broom handles and ran at all the black gangster's disciples (and by that I mean, the little brothers of said gangs,f or the most part), and it was a cluster fuck, tons of cops showed up, kids got expelled, etc.

So, while I can't say I know how every parent talked to each kid, I can say my parents don't give two shits about race, never talk about it (my two best friends growing up were black and asian, respectively, my first fight ever was fighting identical twins who called my friend a nigger, it was like being in the matrix, try punching a guy to "submission" (until he says, oww stop, mom! when his mom isn't around, victory) and then getting up and seeing him ... again! "we meet again.." i said... I'm getting distracted. Point being, while it wasn't TAUGHT to me, I did experience racist thoughts, based on experience. So I would say that it is LEARNED, from experience, or from parents.

Not everything is blind hatred, is my point. While is it misguided to label an entire group based on the actions of others, as a child, you can learn it on your own based on what you encounter. But granted I came of age during a giant migration of people from Chicago to Minneapolis, and at the tail end of the crack era... So, who knows if this is the case everywhere, but I assume if I experienced this in Minneapolis a lot of people had similar experiences.

[–]sollaaan 1 point2 points ago

Who did he steal that line from?

[–]feeteater2 0 points1 point ago

people dont hate people naturally, culture teaches them to.... and who taught culture to hate people? -just sayin

[–]faildata -1 points0 points ago

Is it terrible that at first I was trying to understand the joke because I took "naps" as a racist term?

[–]TheSupremBrambleStag 0 points1 point ago

Napist

[–]dalittle 0 points1 point ago

I miss afternoon naps. The only solace I take is that I will grow old and one day afternoon naps will be mine again.

[–]ForeverTied_hubby 1 point2 points ago

All I will ever see is Tommy Gavin

[–]_namaste 0 points1 point ago

A boatload of cabbage in the rig with his white Irish ass.

[–]theBluemorph 0 points1 point ago

I read the quote without really focusing on the picture and just assumed it was Hilary Clinton... did a little double take...

[–]eazolan 1 point2 points ago

Why did he teach his two year old to hate naps?

[–]SnitchQuadrant -1 points0 points ago

False.

Black babies are often despised by white babies and vice versa.

[–]herpy_McDerpster 0 points1 point ago

Still my favorite comedian to date.

[–]ProfCrastinator 0 points1 point ago

Incorrect. Racism is a natural reaction.

What about dogs who bark at black people?

CAN'T EXPLAIN THAT MOTHERFUCKER.

Nah but seriously. Racism is usually taught but can often be a natural reaction to difference.

[–]Randomacts 0 points1 point ago

If this was /r/shittyaskscience

I would say something like..

The DNA in black people gives them a different smell that while we can't pick it up dogs can. Because of this the dog knows it is not master.

[–]you_sir_are_wrong 0 points1 point ago

OP, this may be what you HOPE is true, but the science says we are likely born racist

[–]HKBFG -1 points0 points ago

hmm... a repost of a joke that in itself was copied from somebody else's work. meta-repost

[–]SaebraK 0 points1 point ago

Sorry, this statement is wrong.

[–]Golgatem 0 points1 point ago

I recently read NurtureShock, which is a great book on counterintuitive things that research can teach us about child development, and the chapter on racism has really stuck with me. Research shows that, left to their own devices, even VERY young children will develop a preference for their own race.

The chapter also argued convincingly that what most of white liberals like me do to try to make our kids color-blind -- throwing our kids in multicultural environments and not talking explicitly with them about race -- actually foment racist attitudes. The kids make observations like "Most of the people who get free lunches are black" and, in the absence of any context, they form naively racist views on how the world works.

If we don't want our kids to be racist, we apparently need to talk explicitly about race with them. Saying things like "Everyone's equal" or showing them TV shows with multicultural characters doesn't do squat.

Since I read that, I've started having uncomfortable-to-me conversations about race with my two-year-old -- talking as openly about racial differences as I do about sexual differences -- instead of just ignoring the fact that some of her classmates have darker skin and letting her come to her own conclusions about it.

[–]KevinUxbridge 0 points1 point ago

*Japs

[–]captiva 0 points1 point ago

A young child makes no judgements about things for which it yet has no evidence. This proves nothing.

[–]wankmastag 0 points1 point ago

Actually the human brain naturally defaults to a racist setting by means of stereotypes.

We naturally stereotype people based on skin color because it is easier for our brain to categorize based on expierienced information, as opposed to disregarding everything we know about races every time we see someone new.

We do this not only with people but with everything from chairs to fruit. Its simply a way to manage information.

[–]mentions_Tom_Cruise 0 points1 point ago

I recently moved into a new suburb and I am a nursing student of brown colour with noticeable features not of a white man. Before I moved into this house with my friend we visited the place a couple of times and noticed a, what appeared to be, a white family living beside the house we were checking out. The area seemed nice and the price was about right, so we agreed on renting it.

After moving into the new place and being all happy inside thinking that I will introduce myself to the neighbours someday and we all will have a good time ahead. But one thing poured hot water over all of my plans.

One day, coming back from school, I noticed that the neighbour had a giant flag of Australia on the front side of his house and also a mini flag on his car which was never there before when we came to see the house. Somehow, this made me feel that may be it's because of us. And after that day, it saddens me that I will never befriend the kids in that house and will always be depressed on my way home.

[–]frolick 0 points1 point ago

[–]drinkit_or_wearit 1 point2 points ago

This is sadly true, my sorry excuse for a father taught me to be a sexist, racist, homophobic, misogynist I was nearly 15 before that delusional world finally showed a crack that I could pick at to get a glimpse of the real world. Now more than 20 years later the hardest thing I do every day is try to apply what I know to be real and true, rather than the hate and ignorance that I learned so early.

[–]im_not_not_white 0 points1 point ago

I worked on playgrounds in some terrible neighborhoods in Chicago, and from time to time I would be harassed by some black people who lived by the park. I would often get funny looks when people would see me.

I didn't always feel comfortable to be honest.

But every time I saw little kids, they always wanted to play and asked me to push them on the slides and whatnot. The kids were usually alone at the playgrounds, so I would talk to them and they thought I was super cool, just like any 9 year old thinks that a 19 year old is cool.

They didn't treat me like I didn't belong at all. Racial divide definitely accumulates over a lifetime.

[–]Pelican_Poop 0 points1 point ago

That and being a waiter makes you pretty racist.

[–]SPChef350 0 points1 point ago

How is this funny?

[–]rymoe89 -1 points0 points ago

This is simply false. Racism is easily born, especially when based on a small sample size.

[–]ifap2downvotes 0 points1 point ago

I saw this on ifunny right before I fed my Dinosaur

[–]xZel -1 points0 points ago

Fuck Denis Leary.

[–]SatinHandyWipe 0 points1 point ago

Isn't denis leary supposed to be an asshole though?

[–]NoSalt -1 points0 points ago

Actually ... humans are designed to be prejudiced at birth. This is what has kept us safe for hundreds of thousands of years. It's hard to fight that kind of history.

[–]Reddits_Antagonist 0 points1 point ago

Slavery against blacks actually didn't form because of racism. It was racism that formed out of slavery.

Kinda weird wording but I hope you get the point.

[–]mbnathan 0 points1 point ago

I've thought sometimes that teaching about past segregation leads kids to think that there in fact is something different about everyone as to instill some sort of prejudice.

[–]Abra-Used-Teleport 0 points1 point ago

My niece, who was living in Ireland for the first 2 years of her life, ended up having a black pediatrician when she came back to America. She was fine up until he reached out to her, then she started screaming bloody murder and trying to hide from him.

After repeated experimentation, we found that she was terrified of dark skin.

[–]Grayphobia 0 points1 point ago

To be fair, racism isn't just hate. For example, that moment of hesitation around a a black/latino teen, is racism.

[–]scottsavoy01 -1 points0 points ago

I'm not up voting because this is probably a Bill Hicks joke..

[–]thecrownprince -1 points0 points ago

This guy stole jokes from Bill Hicks and Louie CK.

[–]imustachelemeaning 0 points1 point ago

Denis Leary raped the corpse of Bill Hicks.

[–]Raven_Rise 0 points1 point ago

why would anyone hate naps?

[–]Jonette2 0 points1 point ago

I love the thoughts of Dennis Leary. Long before Rescue Me. He has always been great in my mind.

[–]vugluskr 0 points1 point ago

That's great logic.

Let's wait till he gets robbed/abused/raped and check then.

[–]cmckzee 0 points1 point ago

This is the second time in 3 months that I have seen this on the front page..

[–]spamato 0 points1 point ago

For a second I thought nap was supposed to be a slur for Asians.

I'm a shitty guy.

[–]Cup_BeaRuh 0 points1 point ago

I agree

By looking through all the videos at world star hip hop i have learned that black people can be very violent. I have taught myself

[–]aazav 0 points1 point ago

what's*

[–]sailingonward 0 points1 point ago

Racism is learned through real-life experience

[–]spage6 0 points1 point ago

Anyone seeking more info might also check here:

title comnts points age /r/
Denis Leary on racism 1021coms 1669pts 3mos funny
Dennis Leary on racism 2coms 103pts 2mos funny

source: karmadecay

[–]abutteredpig 0 points1 point ago

No he does not "know what's up".

paraphrasing his quote; "autism is just poorly behaved kids acting out." Any person with an autistic family member disagrees