this post was submitted on
912 points (74% like it)
1,394 up votes 482 down votes

PerfectTiming

unsubscribe48,747 readers

~37 users here now

Welcome to PerfectTiming: Pictures or Videos that are once-in-a-lifetime shots!


RULES:

  • NO Photoshopped images. Please report the post and/or message the mods with the 'shopped link.
  • NO long-exposure shots.
    Post to /r/ExposurePorn (Safe For Work) instead.
  • NO Memes.
    Use /r/AdviceAnimals instead.
  • Try to avoid things that belong in /r/IllusionPorn (Safe For Work).
  • Post cute cat/dog/pet photos to /r/aww. Not here.
  • Link directly to the image and try to use a reliable host. I prefer imgur.
  • Abide by reddiquette.

Moderator Announcement!



The moderators of /r/PerfectTiming reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.

created by thatseffedupa community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 45 comments

[–]koborIvers 35 points36 points ago

It looks like a metroid!

[–]australianjalien 56 points57 points ago

The spikes underneath look crazy but they're just the tower support wires vapourising.

[–]wiretapp 11 points12 points ago

every time

[–]sacman 2 points3 points ago

Well, not every time.

[–]eehii 1 point2 points ago

I didn't know I had already seen this until I read your comment. I remember being engrossed in finding out what those were.

[–]derpington1244 24 points25 points ago

Jesus, that thing doesn't even look man-made... Real freaky shit.

[–]tychobrahesmoose 13 points14 points ago

Technically it isn't man made. It's a natural chain reaction based on the laws of physics.

Mankind just catalyzed it this time.

[–]tangled_foot 24 points25 points ago

I can't imagine what it must have felt like to be part of Manhattan Project, to work for years to make a nuclear bomb, then when you achieve your goal the realisation that you've made something that is easily powerful enough to wipe out or significantly fuck up all life on earth must have been quite over whelming. It mean it was light years ahead of anything at the time.

[–]nctweg 36 points37 points ago

According to Richard Feynman, who was one of the physicists to have worked on the bomb, most of the scientists on the project didn't really consider that until some while after the detonation had passed. He explained his sentiments about it in, "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman" by claiming all of the scientists were so wrapped up in this project, these series of continually more difficult problems, that many of them were simply excited to see the bomb succeed. A success, of course, meant that the work had been done well.

He said that it wasn't until later on that he really understood what it was that he had helped create. Specifically, from the book:

I returned to civilization shortly after that and went to Cornell to teach, and my first impression was a very strange one. I can't understand it any more, but I felt very strongly then. I sat in a restaurant in New York, for example, and I looked out at the buildings and I began to think, you know, about how much the radius of the Hiroshima bomb damage was and so forth... How far from here was 34th street?... All those buildings, all smashed — and so on. And I would see people building a bridge, or they'd be making a new road, and I thought, they're crazy, they just don't understand, they don't understand. Why are they making new things? It's so useless.

What's interesting to your point is that almost all of the top scientists who worked on the bomb were among those who later advised against using them.

[–]triksterx 15 points16 points ago

Imagine that. Working on all the theory and practical application of a weapon that can instantly effect more lives than most of the world's previous weapons combined (at the time) would make you hesitant to use it. Honestly, a map of a city with the affected area outlined would have been enough for me to say, "yeah, I think this might be going a little too far guys."

[–]Mofrosho 10 points11 points ago

I think it has more to do with their curiosity pertaining toward the physics of it. Anyone initially hearing about this that was passionate for science would want to know what exactly would happen by the end of the project.

[–]triksterx 8 points9 points ago

Oh, I can definitely understand the curiosity part. It just doesn't seem like it should surprise anyone that when they were all done playing with their toys they stepped back and said "WTF are we doing?"

[–]zanmanoodle 2 points3 points ago

Probably a good place to plug in Cat's Cradle, one of Kurt Vonnegut's better novels, and very much a satirical take on nukes and such.

[–]ElMoog 4 points5 points ago

Here's Oppenheimer's poignant view on the subject.

[–]NinjaViking 0 points1 point ago

Leo Szilard was instrumental in getting the Manhattan project going, but towards the war's end the bomb had him scared shitless and he did everything he could to prevent its use. Here is a fascinating site about him.

[–]JustBrowsing4Chan 7 points8 points ago

If this explosion was constantly in this state, and you could just pull it around with a string magically, would it actually cause harm to the area around it? Would your hand burn off if you stuck it into there? Would there be a lot of radiation?

[–]WillSnipeForPie 13 points14 points ago

Yeah the temperature inside that fireball is very intense. There would also be a lot of radiation because the uranium has already undergone a fission reaction and the radioactive particles are contained within the fireball. Also if you're imagining keeping the explosion at this state, the effect of air pressurization and the shock wave will be frozen too. But if you were to drag this thing through a city I would imagine it would melt holes and tunnel through anything in its path.

[–]thavi 13 points14 points ago

No, it would feel like a bunny.

[–]Ocrasorm 1 point2 points ago

Yeah an energizer bunny.

[–]Versalite 5 points6 points ago

Isn't there a photoshop of this as a skull? Or am I thinking of something else?

[–]maz-o[S] 13 points14 points ago

that's some freaky shit... and talk about perfect timing.

(source)

[–]Randolpho 21 points22 points ago

The source doesn't mention scale that I can see. Do you happen to know roughly how big that fireball is at that point?

Edit think I found it: 100 ft.

[–]court12b 14 points15 points ago

I'd also really like to know the shutter speed. must be quite small.

[–]maz-o[S] 14 points15 points ago

up to ten nanoseconds. that's 1/100,000,000s. (same source as above)

[–]3LAU 4 points5 points ago

When is this from? I kinda want to say half a century ago but I can't imagine they had the technology/luck to get a photo like this

[–]meowmix4jo 7 points8 points ago

May/June 1952.

Trinity at 16ms, July 1945

You don't need very high tech to do something like this when you know exactly when it's happening. They set up a bank of cameras.

[–]hillside 0 points1 point ago

Of all images of nuclear explosions, there is something about this one along with its name that makes it, for me, the embodiment of anxiety.

[–]lookxdontxtouch 4 points5 points ago

Ok, now I want to see a nuclear explosion filmed with this

[–]triksterx 3 points4 points ago

You realize that video is actually a composite of hundreds of photos taken of individual events, right? It's kinda like claymation, only at a subatomic level.

[–]lookxdontxtouch 8 points9 points ago

You realize that ALL video is a composite of hundreds of photos taken of individual events right?

[–]triksterx 3 points4 points ago

Okay, I didn't explain myself well enough. The trillion FPS video was made by shooting light into a bottle and taking a picture. Then they shot light into the bottle again, and took another picture slightly later (one one-trillionth of a second, to be exact) than the first. They repeated this as many times as it took to get the desired video frame rate. It is not a video of a single pulse of light (one event), but a video made by taking pictures of hundreds and thousands of pulses of light and compositing them together. That's why it is called femto-photgraphy and not femto-cinematography.

In order to capture just a few seconds of a nuclear explosion in that frame rate you would have to film TRILLIONS of individual explosion events and hope the explosions propagated in an identical manner every time.

[–]Gooberpatrol66 5 points6 points ago

Ehh, kinda. They said the camera had "500 different sensors", or something to that effect. They staggered the activation of each sensor to offset the limited speed of the sensor. So the entire scene is shot at once, but only a single line of it. It's similar to scanline rendering in computer graphics. The rotating mirror allowed them to change the scene being rendered for each line. They then composited the lines into a final video.

TL;DR The video is not a composite of photographs, but rather a composite of complete videos that are all 1 pixel high, stacked on top of each other.

[–]triksterx 2 points3 points ago

That's interesting. I was using the information I gathered from watching the TEDtalks video in my reply, and the explanation he gives in that video alludes more to a still-frame composite (which I realize is obviously not the case now that I have read the more in-depth description of how it works and the equipment they use). In either scenario, the result is the same. You would need a great many identical events to form a femto-photography composite of a nuclear explosion. So although this works well for controlled experiments using light from a highly calibrated laser, pretty much any other event is beyond this camera's capabilities.

[–]eb86 3 points4 points ago

Anyone else notice the deer in the bottom right of the pic?

[–]my2penniesworth 7 points8 points ago

I was too busy being distracted by the screaming skull inside the cloud.

(Pardon my poor paint skills)

[–]eb86 4 points5 points ago

Now the deer is on the bottom left.

[–]TreesRNoMakeMeDumb 2 points3 points ago

No way, is that really a deer? I've seen this image dozens of times and I've never seen that.

[–]eb86 7 points8 points ago

Well, it was a deer.

[–]myotheralt 0 points1 point ago

Dinner!

[–]grizzledburr 1 point2 points ago

I'm calling bullshit. That's a jelly fish

[–]PossAbilities 1 point2 points ago

My friends used this image for their album art

[–]thepeck -2 points-1 points ago

Repost but awesome

[–]digbus -4 points-3 points ago

Wonder whats on reddit today? oh just reposts.. Reposted daily..

[–]smokeymctokerson -3 points-2 points ago

It looks like a repost that was posted only a few weeks ago. Oh wait, it is

[–]Muufokfok -5 points-4 points ago

Am I really the only one that sees it?
http://i.imgur.com/vqVpI.gif