I have to disagree on the qualification.

Willard went on a foreign policy milk run and he managed to put his foot in his mouth everywhere the plane touched down. It's one thing to put on a dog and pony show for the voting public, Where the rubber meets the road, people pay attention to what he's saying, and what he was saying was just stupid. And he got rightly fragged for it.

I've seen footage of Willard steamrolling over someone who didn't quite agree with him. Which is something you can do with the pink-haired ladies who are awed by Mitt the multi millionair, but that shit won't fly when he's talking to Vladimir Putin. This is a guy who was trained to spot weakness in an adversary and use it. Or the Chinese leadership, when they smile kindly at Willard's suggestion and then, all nice and polite like, tell him to go fuck himself.

I'm certainly not saying Obama hasn't made some sad decisions that I'm not happy about, but even the republicans don't like Romney.

Romney has been entitled all his life. Other than that, I can't say I disagree with some of his positions: he's held every position on every topic. I have agreed with Willard more than once, just because he said yes where he used to say no. That doesn't mean he hasn't changed his mind in the mean time, but at one time, Willard and I agreed.

Kerry was called a flip flopper, Romney is the quantum candidate: he holds every position on every topic all at the same time.

Which makes you wonder what position he'll choose to take when he has to make a hard decision for one side or another. It's not hard to say, it's impossible to say what side he'll choose to be on at any given moment.

The man has proven to be a shrewd, and unaccountable, corporate raider. Let's at least give him that. That doesn't make him a fit person to be the president of the united states. The man, truly, is not qualified for that position.