this post was submitted on
2,296 points (67% like it)
4,501 up votes 2,205 down votes

sandy

unsubscribe9,681 readers

489 users here now

Information and discussion around Hurricane Sandy and the possible Frankenstorm/Snowicane/Floodmageddon.

Post your personal experiences, photos, and video of Hurricane Sandy.

Now with user-editable flair! Show your location, help those near you if you can, and be safe.

Note: Please don't ignore evacuation warnings just to score reddit karma.


Help and donate:


Useful links:


For outsiders:


Do you have any suggestions for things we should put in the sidebar? Only useful and informative links, please.

/r/Sandy: Check out and vote up at /new! Fluff and humor goes here! Report Joke and political links. Please also report donation posts so we can verify sources! Only trust the sidebar until verified by mods! Stay safe!

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]haatpiraat 68 points69 points ago

I wouldve drowned since i live in Holland near the ocean under sea level :(

[–]trickiwoo 33 points34 points ago

pretty much what happened in New Orleans :/

[–]gianna_in_hell_as 18 points19 points ago

Take this with a grain of salt but I read that when Dutch engineers saw the state of the levees in New Orleans before Katrina they were completely appalled. It's possible it would not happen to the Netherlands or at least not with that severity.

[–]RidderBier 15 points16 points ago

The Netherlands also has pre-planned flood areas. If the water level rises these areas are flooded to prevent damage to highly populated areas.

It's safe to say that some dams would still fail during such a storm. There's just too many of them. Besides, the rainfall alone would trouble the drainage systems.

[–]Akasa 5 points6 points ago

The Dutch learnt their lesson quickly and that's why they have such fantastic flood defences.

[–]lesnins 21 points22 points ago

But.. You're a pirate!

[–]Jedakiah 3 points4 points ago

I wonder how long it would take the existing pumping stations to drain the reclaimed parts of the Zuiderzee if a hurricane filled her up. Perhaps a hurricane could destroy sections of the Afsluitdijk further delaying such a recovery.

[–]tkcom 11 points12 points ago

I once smashed a keyboard and got Afsluitdijk.

[–]alwayssunnyinLA 464 points465 points ago

This also puts the size of the United States into perspective.

[–]PapaTua 277 points278 points ago

Europe is tiny!

[–]Enema 275 points276 points ago

"In America 100 years is a long time. In Europe 100 miles is a long distance."

I know i stole that from someone but i'm too lazy to look it up.

[–]Dreamercz 47 points48 points ago

And Russians laugh at both.

[–]inormallyjustlurkbut 59 points60 points ago

In Russia, $100 is a lot of money.

[–]rauelNoman 4 points5 points ago

How much does Russia weigh?

[–]ahubbs 2 points3 points ago

3 vodka

[–]neilson241 79 points80 points ago

"In America, 1 Internet search is a lot of effort."

[–]neilson241 22 points23 points ago

Now I realize that he does not live in America. Scratch that.

[–]Dastak 21 points22 points ago

scratching that

[–]neilson241 15 points16 points ago

Thank you for your service.

[–]xtremebox 4 points5 points ago

de nada

[–]gobongo 687 points688 points ago

Europe, do you even lift?

[–]PapaTua 99 points100 points ago

I heard Germany squats, but I have my doubts.

[–]meatfish 179 points180 points ago

I have heard France runs.

[–]danheinz 48 points49 points ago

I think they rollerblade

[–]Septem 16 points17 points ago

This is really a small part of Europe.

[–]YHofSuburbia 63 points64 points ago

Fight me IRL - USA

[–]Madonkadonk 46 points47 points ago

[–]Durzo_Blint 35 points36 points ago

It's ok Ireland, you can join our "Countries that hate England Club".

[–]wallawalla22 102 points103 points ago

I believe Ireland was the founder.

[–]TheBrownie 50 points51 points ago

France saids hi.

[–]cal679 22 points23 points ago

Scotland since day one, bitches.

[–]DSQ 33 points34 points ago

You're all the wrong, the founder, president and most enthusiastic member of the "Countries that hate England Club" is, of course, England .

[–]localtoastMiddle of New Brunswick 5 points6 points ago

France pretends that; they secretly love Britain.

It took you guys to beat up the Germans... twice!

[–]Policeman333 2 points3 points ago

Are you aware?

[–]Geronimo2011 23 points24 points ago

Europe is bigger as the part on the pic and bigger as the EU. North America is really big, but Europe is about as big as the USA.

For the lazy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe

[–]llII 14 points15 points ago

According to Wikipedia, Europe is bigger than the US:

Europe: 3,930,000 sq mi
USA:    3,794,000 sq mi

There are just more countries than states. Maybe lies in the fact that the history is a bit older and more fights were fought around the ownership of land.

EDIT: I was wrong. The number of states and countrys are the same.

[–]Jontenn 5 points6 points ago

there are an equal number of countries and states in the two continents.

[–]reddit-delenda-est 2 points3 points ago

North America has 23 sovereign states, Europe 50.

[–]llII 12 points13 points ago

According to Wikipedia, Europe is bigger than the US:

Europe: 3,930,000 sq mi
USA:    3,794,000 sq mi

There are just more countries than states. Maybe lies in the fact that the history is a bit older and more fights were fought around the ownership of land.

EDIT: I was wrong. The number of states and countrys are the same.

[–]Ravek 11 points12 points ago

Europe is actually about 4% larger than the United States. (Check the side panels on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States)

Although if we're talking European Union, then yeah that's only like 40% of the USA's size. Only about a fifth of the EU or less is in OP's picture, so yeah.

[–]nickiter 53 points54 points ago

This continent has to be at least... three times bigger than this!

[–]smackid 103 points104 points ago

what is this? a continent for ants?!

[–]EvolutionNeo 9 points10 points ago

hes absolutely right!

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]barryq25 8 points9 points ago

It's not tiny, that's just central/northern Europe

[–]Teds101 26 points27 points ago

Californian here. Never been out of the state until a school trip to the east coast. It was crazy because we'd be on the freeway and one minute we're mass. Then we're in Connecticut then boom New York within 3-4 hours. It was insane. I'm imagining that's how Europe is.

[–]throwawaymechanic37 23 points24 points ago

Kinda, I visited for a month, my family and I joked that we always have to carry our passports because if you take a wrong turn you'll end up in a different country.

From London, England to Paris, France took 2 hours. By TRAIN.

[–]llII 19 points20 points ago

A train that's 186 mph fast. Also the trip is at least 2h 16m.

London and Paris are pretty close to each other. Try traveling from Berlin to Madrid for example ...

And yes, I know that Europe is smaller than the USA and Russa, China etc. but it's not like you can cross it in 2 hours.

[–]MooseBear 14 points15 points ago

Trains are dope.

[–]Septem 4 points5 points ago

Yeah but like how would Americans know with their slow connections?

[–]SMTRodent 2 points3 points ago

On the other hand, from England to Andorra is a two-day road trip. France is quite big.

[–]Ken_Breadbox 8 points9 points ago

And in Canada we have counties the size of states. Ontario, from east to west, takes two days to drive through. And by two days I mean 48 hours.

[–]jackblack2323 2 points3 points ago

yeah it's pretty cool living in a tri state area. I can drive from ohio to kentucky to indiana within 30 minutes from where I live

[–]MikeBruski 1 point2 points ago

i recently drove from Milan Italy to Prague, Czech Republic, 1000km-ish.

Start to finish, i was in 6 countries, Italy, Lichtenstein, Switzerland, Austria, Germany, Czech Republic. During a few hours of driving. (Germany was a bit fast because we were going 180-200km/h most of the time on the Autobahn)

There are areas in Europe where you can go through 1 country per hour, e.g. this netherlandic route.

i live in Copenhagen, and i know hundreds of people who live in Sweden and work in Denmark. Commute is 40-50 minutes, sometimes even 30 minutes, so it's no problem at all...

[–]llII 5 points6 points ago

You can have a commute that's 5 minutes per foot and live in a different country than your work is. It's all a matter of how far away those places are from each other.

[–]reddit-delenda-est 3 points4 points ago

Then so is the US? Comparison overlay.

[–]ConstableOdo 0 points1 point ago

I just realized this. Paris is as far from Prague as I am from Hurricane, West Virginia. Really, if I could get to Paris, and get a car, I could drive all around Europe no problem. Damn.

[–]5510 206 points207 points ago

Not to get too off topic, but this is why i get pissed off when people start playing the "americans are mono-lingual because they are arrogant," and "americans are ignorant of other countries because they are arrogant"

Yeah, I'll be the first to admit Americans sometimes can be arrogant, but Europeans don't always seem to actually grasp just how BIG the USA is(plus that is pretty isolated).

We arn't bilingual because we have a giant country with one language. Of course somebody from Amsterdam is more likely to be multi-lingual. If DC, Virgina, Maryland, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania all spoke different languages (kindof like Europe), then I would probably be bilingual as well.

[–]TheDerivation 120 points121 points ago

I agree; Europeans learn languages because they have to, not because they're more cooperative or less arrogant than Americans. Coincidentally, I'm from Amsterdam, and in my country it's normal to learn at least English, French, and German, because if you don't and you drive east or south for a couple of hours, no one will understand you. That said, being bilingual has many cognitive benefits (e.g. a more developed linguistic and psychological insight in children and a smaller chance of Alzheimer's for the elderly) and I believe having access to other cultures does broaden your perspective, so it wouldn't hurt for Americans to put a bit more effort into it (the same goes for the British, who ARE Europeans :p).

[–]renderless 83 points84 points ago

As an American who grew up all over the world and experienced a myriad of different cultures, people are just people wherever you go.

[–]marblefoot 5 points6 points ago

Shush you with your logic and insight!

[–]M3tus 21 points22 points ago

and you drive east or south for a couple of hours, no one will understand you.

Man, that puts a perspective to it for me...I drive 5 hours to work in my companies satellite office in Seattle...never leave the state of Washington.

[–]Razarazz 15 points16 points ago

A 5 hour plane journey in Europe will take you from snow topped Viking lands to the blazing heat of Arab markets... Europe may be small compared to the USA but there is a phenomenal amount of diversity in culture, language, race, attitude, etc. over very very short distances. West/South/East/central EU are all very different places.

[–]M3tus 1 point2 points ago

So true...plan on spending a few weeks in Europe for my 10 wedding anniversary...can't wait.

[–]Fhouse 3 points4 points ago

Washington is almost the same diameter as my country, still 1.99 times bigger! http://mapfight.appspot.com/hu-vs-us.wa

[–]elfonzi 2 points3 points ago

Seattle to goldendale, so long a drive same state and not even halfway across.

[–]llamasauce 50 points51 points ago

I believe having access to other cultures does broaden your perspective, so it wouldn't hurt for Americans to put a bit more effort into it.

Just because America has one language doesn't mean we have one culture. There is certainly an over-arching popular culture, but we are not all the same.

[–]TheDerivation 8 points9 points ago

I didn't say America only has one culture. I'm in Massachusetts now and I'm sure it's very different from Texas. Plus, seeing as America is full of immigrants, it's a melting pot of different cultures, which is great. It's just that not understanding someone's language can sometimes lead to a feeling of alienation, and it's an amazing feeling to learn a language and to understand what people are saying. It makes you understand their culture while at the same time making you realise that in the end we're all people and we all talk about the same kinds of things, even if we use different words.

[–]Terr_ 5 points6 points ago

Just because America has one language doesn't mean we have one culture.

That is, unless you count the culture we export, which tends to be pared down based on commercial/corporate priorities.

That might mesh with the "country is bigger than you might think" angle. If a small country were exporting all the TV shows and movies and McDonalds etc. that the US does, it might be tempting to think "Wow, they must be really scraping the bottom of the cultural barrel to generate that much stuff." (Whether the stuff the US does export counts as the dregs is another story.)

[–]Szoro 8 points9 points ago

I'm British and speak um must be 3, no 4 other... Just kidding, you guys all learnt English so there's no need! :D

Saying that, I still have the image in my head of my friend trying to mime toilet paper in Italy when nobody spoke English.

[–]ZippyDan 2 points3 points ago

However, learning more languages makes you more cooperative and less arrogant. It exposes you to different cultures, different peoples, different ways of doing things, and different ways of seeing the world.

[–]beernmeat 7 points8 points ago

Sure we (the Dutch) are an unusually multilingual nation, but let's not pretend the rest of Europe is like us. Since when are the British, French, Spanish, or Italians known for their multilingualism?

[–]bbibber 2 points3 points ago

Most Dutch people are just bilingual and that's not unusual imho. Sure, they may have had a few years of French in highschool, but in general can't even maintain a basic conversation about the weather.

[–]5pinDMXconnector 10 points11 points ago

All american children must study a 2nd language in high school for at least two years. most of the time its Spanish/French/German. I've seen a Mandarin and Russian too.

[–]atla 25 points26 points ago

Let's be honest. Two years of high school language doesn't really do much.

[–]Doesnt_Get_Irony 9 points10 points ago

I pretty much learned si, and that's it. My Spanish classes were a joke.

[–]FishFuzz99 7 points8 points ago

That is up to the school. Many universities require 2 years of another language though.

[–]Bewbtube 3 points4 points ago

It depends on the state and school system. I went to a public high school, and we had two diplomas. The regular one, which required two years of any foreign language or the "honors" which required 4. From my experience, Spanish and French are poorly taught in those first two years, often the Spanish 3 or French 3 teacher would basically have to give a crash course of the first two years. Those students that only took 2 years go on to forget practically everything they learned.

I personally had the luck of taking Latin. The particularly lucky part of this was that there were only two Latin teachers and they taught all 5 levels of the language (you could start taking your foreign language in the 8th grade). The teachers were fantastic and I left with a better knowledge of Spanish than the people that took Spanish for 4 years.

[–]briannac25 2 points3 points ago

And American Sign Language.

[–]Neker 3 points4 points ago

... the British, who are almost Europeans ...

FTFY ;-)

[–]myrpou 5 points6 points ago

No, they are europeans.

[–]5510 2 points3 points ago

Exactly. While I agree it would be nice for people to learn an extra language, like you said, in Amsterdam, you drive a few hours radius and run into several different languages. For me to drive to the closest country where English is not the first language (mexico), I would have to drive like 28 hours...

[–]richalex2010North Central Connecticut 3 points4 points ago

And it's very difficult to learn a language when your only exposure is in a classroom; it's even harder to retain that knowledge when you don't even have exposure from a classroom. If you don't use it, you lose it.

[–]barryq25 4 points5 points ago

Yeah, you're right but Europe is bigger than the USA

[–]parlezmoose 15 points16 points ago

"Not get off topic, but let me go on a long winded rant that has nothing to do with the topic at hand."

[–]Igosuki 2 points3 points ago

You're the one that doesn't grasp how large Europe is. France is as large as Texas.

[–]5510 2 points3 points ago

That's kindof the point... France, a major European country, is almost as big of Texas... one single US state. Texas is one of the biggest states, but it's still a small part of the US as a whole.

[–]xteve 1 point2 points ago

We arn't bilingual because we have a giant country with one language.

The truth is that we are in fact multilingual, because we are a nation of immigrants.

But that's not as important (linguistically) as the fact that we are explicitly bilingual. There is a large population of Spanish-language people here.

[–]kabalalala 13 points14 points ago

You realize this picture doesn't show a lot of Europe, right?

[–]Fzero21 24 points25 points ago

Smaller than Canada and Russia. With 10 times more people.

[–]poktanju 38 points39 points ago

Ten times more people than Canada. Only twice as many people as Russia.

Russia's immense though. It's bigger than Canada and the lower 48 put together.

[–]bctich 27 points28 points ago

You can't leave out Alaska! It's 1/3 the size of the entire Continental U.S. and, like Russia, is mostly a deserted wilderness!

[–]originaux 26 points27 points ago

BECAUSE THEN IT WOULDN'T BE TRUE AND HE IS TRYING TO PROVE A POINT!

[–]Quaytsar 6 points7 points ago

Europe minus Russia (the European part) is smaller than the USA. Russia minus the European part of Russia is bigger than the USA.

[–]eiriklf 1 point2 points ago

Mhm, the US is almost as large as all of Europe(in area, the population in the US is less than half that of europe)!

This stupid picture includes only a small section of Europe, so it's no wonder sandy seems so large.

[–]Superjuden 7 points8 points ago

America, where a hundred years is a long time.

Europe, where a hundred miles is long way.

[–]SOncredible 77 points78 points ago

You son of a bitch. You put it in Saarland. Heartless monster.
I don't have any supplies

[–]BoonTobias 35 points36 points ago

yolo

[–]valiantscamp 36 points37 points ago

Yeah, she's one big bitch.

[–]dstson 171 points172 points ago

Actually for me that just puts Europe in perspective, you small ass bitches.

edit: pluralized bitch

[–]Red_Dog1880 119 points120 points ago

My stone house says 'Hi'.

[–]pegasus_527 14 points15 points ago

TIL stone houses aren't the norm in the USA

[–]Red_Dog1880 0 points1 point ago

From what I got from my family over there it's a very simple reason: Money.

My uncle was able to build a huge house in pre-fab, completely decorated, pool, huge area,... for about the same price that would get you a small row house over here.

[–]HumphreysMcphee 54 points55 points ago

Sure you have stone houses, but do you have corn palaces??

Didn't think so.

[–]MaximKat 18 points19 points ago

Hey, I watch the Colbert Report too.

[–]HumphreysMcphee 8 points9 points ago

I love the Colbert Report, but haven't seen it in quite a while. I assume he recently talked about that thing?

[–]MaximKat 5 points6 points ago

Yeah, 2 weeks ago, I think. They had a "story" about drought causing shortage of corn of rare colors.

[–]timothyrds 3 points4 points ago

Hey, I live near there. It is the most awful joke of a tourist attraction ever.

[–]solidus-flux 3 points4 points ago

My old state has a Mars Cheese Castle.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]neomicron 41 points42 points ago

Not for much longer.

[–]NorthAve 3 points4 points ago

In the southeast as well.

[–]rauelNoman 7 points8 points ago

Interesting comment. Are redditors actually aware that American homes are built out of plywood, toxic Chinese drywall, and walls full of recycled garbage? While European homes are built so well and so solidly that they last hundreds of years?

[–]Red_Dog1880 4 points5 points ago

Not sure if serious ?

I meant it as a joke, but are there really homes built over there with those materials ?

[–]rauelNoman 2 points3 points ago

Only the very expensive homes out of reach of 85%+ of Americans are built using those materials. Most American homes are built with the cheapest possible materials and fit only to be torn down after 40-50 years or so.

I was looking at newly constructed town homes (row houses) a couple of years ago and the insulation between the walls was literally garbage (recycled paper and such). Needless to say I wasn't about to buy such a home.

And where I live now I can hear every word my neighbors speak and vice versa. The walls between our apartments are paper thin.

[–]purplearmored 5 points6 points ago

Oh good Lord you don't have to be like that about it. Lots of homes in the northeast are built of brick and stone. Out west, you don't need all that because of the heat and in California, all those 'solidly built' houses would fall right down in an earthquake.

[–]FuckingDIY 3 points4 points ago

I love that re-using materials for insulation is somehow a negative. That really shows your commitment to sustainable construction.

Also, American homes are largely built with wood and plywood because we have a lot of lumber. New construction is affordable, efficient and well insulated. There are undoubtedly some developers producing buildings of sub-standard quality, but there's nothing wrong with making platform-framing houses and apartments out of wood. As for the flooding, or other damage...buildings are easily replaced. If you build on the coast in an area prone to flooding, you kind of expect to re-build at some point. That's why they're usually built 10 ft off the ground with hurricane ties and proper roof form.

We don't build things out of stone because it's an expensive, slow, labor intensive process that results in expensive houses that are hard to change over time. There are some stone houses. We also have some wood-frame houses that date back to the 1600's. Not exactly old by European standards, but it shows that wood buildings can last if people want them to last.

You'll find plenty of brick construction in the older cities of the North-east, but they were largely built at a time when brick and labor was affordable. Our country is newer, so we have less stone construction. For the most part we rely on platform framing because it's usually the cheapest option available for low-scale detached residential structures. Steel, modular units and structural insulated panels are becoming more popular as prices come down, and people move into cities with higher density housing. I suppose you would also complain about living in a building made of cheap Styrofoam and plywood, but they can be very efficient well insulated structures, capable of withstanding high winds.


If your apartment (in the US?) has paper thin walls...then it's because the developer was cheap and didn't care about sound insulation. It's not because the building is made of wood. It's because the builder didn't create a good wall assembly. Modern buildings use multiple components to achieve the results they want because it's cheaper and more efficient. In the old days they would just put up a stone wall and call it a day. If it fails to meet code in your area, you can actually force your landlord to make adjustments...starting with the outlets and then fixing the insulation within the actual wall.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]oystn 2 points3 points ago

Norway has wooden houses and gets hit by hurricanes stronger than Sandy yearly. The houses still stand (most of the time).

[–]Red_Dog1880 5 points6 points ago

but Vikings.

[–]Mugros 33 points34 points ago

Europe reporting in:

Area

Europe: 10,180,000 km²

USA: 9,826,675 km²

It's a bit like oranges and apples, or continent vs. country, but there you have it.

[–]blue_strat 13 points14 points ago

Population

Europe: 739,165,030

North America: 528,720,588

European Union: 503,492,041

United States: 314,674,000

[–]kaiyotic 9 points10 points ago

that was just a tiny part of Europe mate.

[–]llII 6 points7 points ago

According to Wikipedia, Europe is bigger than the US:

Europe: 3,930,000 sq mi
USA:    3,794,000 sq mi

There are just more countries than states. Maybe lies in the fact that the history is a bit older and more fights were fought around the ownership of land.

EDIT: I was wrong. The number of states and countrys are the same.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]fuckpig 13 points14 points ago

[–]Terr_ -1 points0 points ago

You're just mad that we're stealing your legendary Russian Winters, as well as your vodka! Soon, nothing will be left! Muwhahahahah!

[–]FetusFeast 30 points31 points ago

America...

Even our storms are fat.

[–]QWOP_Sparkle 23 points24 points ago

Actually looking at this is quite scary...

[–]paperhat 143 points144 points ago

Don't worry. It's not real. Sandy is actually in the United States.

[–]Mattho 7 points8 points ago

There's a reason why modern society evolved in Europe and not say in deadly-animal-ifested Australia or hurricane-tornado-and-earthquake-covered North America.

edit: damn, comment bellow says the same

[–]dahi3444 3 points4 points ago

America - saving Europe once again.

[–]srsizzy 24 points25 points ago

Made me realize how fucked they'd all be if storms like this happened there. However, the fact that they don't probably contributed to, you know, the rise of Western civilization.

[–]sylvainlp 11 points12 points ago

Note that Europe - and France in particular - is regulary hitten by extra-tropical storms... Last notable one was Xynthia cyclone in 2010. In 1999, 2 cyclones (Lothar & Martin) hit France between the 26th and the 28th december with winds as fast as 130 mph at Paris.

Natural disasters probably don't contribute to any civilizations, you are right on that. But Europe went throught some terrible one and what about Japan for example.

[–]bonobo1 6 points7 points ago

Yup. 1987 and 1990 were bad for the UK.

(Pressure chart for 1990 storm)

[–]barsoap 6 points7 points ago

130 mph

As someone from Jutland, yes, even I must admit that that's a rather fresh breeze.

[–]fakelvis 7 points8 points ago

If they did happen regularly, we'd put a lot of effort into disaster prevention.

For instance, following the North Sea flood of 1953 the Netherlands didn't just strengthen the dykes… they created the Delta Works: a 50-year, $7 billion project to protect thousands of km2 of below-sea-level land.

[–]gnomishmidgets 4 points5 points ago

I may be misremembering, but according to QI isn't england the tornado capital of the world? i could be very wrong on this one

[–]bonobo1 7 points8 points ago

Yes, apparently so in terms of number per square mile. They're normally of very low intensity and don't last long, although we do get the odd one causing significant damage.

edit: UK, not just England.

[–]gmorales87 2 points3 points ago

English tornados. Meh

[–]Archybaldie 10 points11 points ago

Hey now hey! i remember seeing one when i was a kid. The crisp packet swirled up quite dramatically. Somebody could have got scratched!

[–]naffer 21 points22 points ago

Nice. And where's the rest of the continent?

[–]SkepticalWonkaGuy 3 points4 points ago

Washed away by the storm-surge.

[–]Ed_is_on_Reddit[S] 26 points27 points ago

Having read some of the comments I'd like to clear something up for the North Americans: this picture does not show all of Europe. We're small but we're not that small.

[–]petrobonal 6 points7 points ago

This actually needs to be a disclaimer?

Oh god...

[–]reddit-delenda-est 2 points3 points ago

A comparison overlay. Sorry about Alaska, it was kind of hard to fit in, but it looks about the same size as France and Spain together.

[–]nielwulf 12 points13 points ago

I remember doing something like this for the oil spill in the Gulf, covered the entirety of Switzerland...

[–]eternallucidity 55 points56 points ago

We just call it "another rainy day"

[–]BoneHeadJonesLong Island 71 points72 points ago

Do you make a distinction for days when it is raining sideways?

[–]Niqulaz 68 points69 points ago

We call it "autumn".

[–]Red_Dog1880 39 points40 points ago

'A bit wet' in Ireland.

[–]glitterballs 38 points39 points ago

That's a sunny day in Seattle you pussies.

[–]KingToasty 10 points11 points ago

I honestly wouldn't notice a tsunami here in Vancouver.

[–]MikeBruski 6 points7 points ago

Bergen , Norway, is dressing down to go to the beach.

[–]poopOnU 8 points9 points ago

What do you call it when your house is flooded and car is floating down the street?

[–]glitterballs 49 points50 points ago

Tuesday.

[–]BlackStrain 8 points9 points ago

And that's a good day.

[–]Alpinestarhero 4 points5 points ago

Wednesday gets terrible. The car is fully submerged, on its roof, and the dog is trapped inside. Again.

[–]vintagepint0 25 points26 points ago

And Sandy only affects some of the mid-Atlantic and New England regions of the US.

[–]ksa2 8 points9 points ago

How long do we get to call New England "new"?

[–]vintagepint0 6 points7 points ago

'New' doesn't modify the temporality of 'the England' in North America relative to 'the England' in Europe. The signifier New England is to be taken as a single unit of reference for the region furthest northeast in what is currently the US.

[–]Guck_Mal 5 points6 points ago

just like "new york"

[–]cal679 16 points17 points ago

Having been to York I can safely say that the new version is a significant upgrade.

[–]Guck_Mal 3 points4 points ago

I concur - but it is still "the new York". No matter how old the city might get, it will not change the fact that it is the new York.

[–]somecleverusername62 7 points8 points ago

until they make a newer york.

[–]1corn 12 points13 points ago

Off to Kickstarter!

[–]AsskickMcGee 116 points117 points ago

If only... It might set a record for the cleanest the French have ever been.

[–]poktanju 42 points43 points ago

They'll find a way to set fire to cars that are sitting in 5 ft of water.

[–]srsizzy 27 points28 points ago

I don't understand how they even drive when every time they see a car they have to set it on fire.

[–]silver_medalist 5 points6 points ago

Grand day in Waterford.

[–]beerandchips 22 points23 points ago

'Tis but a breeze

[–]Sleepy_One 5 points6 points ago

Put on something warmer than a fucking kilt.

[–]RockFerrit 2 points3 points ago

Any casualties yet?

[–]quishgowanus/park slope 3 points4 points ago

I'm hearing 11 in the US so far. There were, I believe, 48 before it hit the US if i'm remembering correctly.

[–]glinsvad 1 point2 points ago

Meh, we live in brick houses.

[–]RossB543 4 points5 points ago

What I find scariest is that people think Glasgow is the capital of Scotland.

[–]Affero-Dolor 0 points1 point ago

In fairness, it probably should be. Kicks the ass of Edinburgh anyway. Actually, maybe we should make Dundee the capital and watch tourists look upon Fat Sam's in confusion.

[–]Septem 8 points9 points ago

Oh wow, what a big circlejerk. Americans, do you have size issues?

[–]karmehameha 0 points1 point ago

Belgium would be fucked lol

[–]DemocraticElephant 0 points1 point ago

Dear lord baby Jesus

[–]smilingarmpits 0 points1 point ago

yay, Spain safe!

[–]KaNineteen 2 points3 points ago

So this is probably a really stupid question, but... do hurricanes ever come from the other direction?

[–]richalex2010North Central Connecticut 6 points7 points ago

What other direction? Originating off South America and moving east toward Europe? That doesn't happen, the direction is determined by the rotation of the planet.

Sorry, I'd go more in depth but I'm stuck on my phone (Internet went out yesterday thanks to this storm, but 3G is still good).

[–]KaNineteen 5 points6 points ago

Right, no. That answers my question. I live in the middle part of America where water and science is weird and confusing. Hell can rain down on us from any direction so long as it's spinning and angry without confusion, so I was wondering if occasionally God was right handed towards Europe.

Thanks for the response. I hope you stay safe, dry, and well connected.

[–]ironicalballs 1 point2 points ago

Hurricanes = Earth's version of sweating

Hot hot hot? Turn hot water into vapor and release the energy with cyclonic force.

[–]crazyjackal 2 points3 points ago

As a person who has just come out from under a rock, this image greatly confused me as to wondering how the hell there was a hurricane over Europe... Then more confusion as to how this hurricane was over New Jersey as well. I was so damn confused that it only took me re-reading the title in this thread to realise this is not a picture of the hurricane Sandy over Europe but overlayed over Europe for comparison.

Damn I feel like an idiot.

[–]Thermodynamicist 2 points3 points ago

I only see a satellite photograph of an ordinary British summer.

[–]Grarr_Dexx 0 points1 point ago

How much of that storm is dangerous, though?

[–]foreverskepticalone 0 points1 point ago

Holy shit, we would all die.

[–]twogunsalute 1 point2 points ago

Hah Fuck you Paris!

[–]Warm_KittyUK 0 points1 point ago

My god! I never knew it was that bad :(

[–]bodyglove 1 point2 points ago

Please explain, which part of all those clouds is actually the hurricane? We have winds doing over 60 mp/h on a monthly basis. Is glasgow in this example threatened?

[–]anchasta 2 points3 points ago

Yup. Winds, rain, storms, strengthening as you get closer to the center, a perfect silence in the eye of the storm, and them BOOM, the second wall hits.

[–]hiienkiuas 0 points1 point ago

*how hurricane Sandy compares to UK

[–]N8CCRG -1 points0 points ago

You can tell this was obviously not made by an American because of 'centre'.

[–]kodozoku 0 points1 point ago

Y'all are used to snow, though. NYC isn't quite so used to flooding.