this post was submitted on
23 points (78% like it)
32 up votes 9 down votes

WTF

subscribe2,107,427 readers

4,903 users here now

New Rules:

  • No screenshots (e.g. Facebook, Youtube)
  • No memes, captioned images.
  • No rage comics
  • No politics / posts with political implications - Includes Activism, Call for public outcry etc.
  • No re-hosted web comics
  • No begging for upvotes
  • No links to reddit
  • Personal information is not allowed and will be removed, repeat offenders banned
  • Links to facebook are not allowed
  • NSFW posts must be tagged or will be removed.
  • Gore and Porn are not by default WTF, consider posting the more extreme stuff to /r/spacedicks

All (& only) things that make you say WTF. The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts for not being WTF and would be more appropriate in more relevant subreddits.


Thanks to licenseplate for the excellent logo & thanks to humansmartbomb for the previous logo


Please DO NOT post personal information

Such posts or comments will be removed and offenders may be banned. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


Shout Outs:

/r/weird

/r/creepy

/r/creepy_gif

/r/offbeat

/r/WTFart

/r/NSFW_WTF

/r/sfw_wtf

/r/BugWars

/r/awesome

/r/toosoon

/r/mildlyinteresting

/r/FanTheories

New: /r/tifu

New: /r/MorbidReality

New: FUCK GAWKER


Exceptions to the rules can be granted by the moderators; The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 27 comments

[–]treedick2011 11 points12 points ago

SRS needs to be banned. This is what happens when you get moral high grounders power. They are trying to threaten and coerce morality. I don't care if that shit stain of a sub reddit wants to sit there and bitch about shit they don't agree with.

Hell, i say this for anyone. If you want to sit on your front porch and scream and rant and rave about your ideology to people walking by, thats fucking fine. That is your prerogative. However, once those rants and raves turn to threats with actual teeth behind them, you are a danger. This shouldn't be allowed, and the admins should trash them all.

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 6 points7 points ago

Violating peoples' privacy for sexual pleasure is a crime, and the violator needs a legal trial.

However, internet vigilantism could lead to some psycho to actually murder the guy, which is a worse crime than the pictures.

[–]fartsmoker 3 points4 points ago

You have just been banned from r/shitredditsays.

[–]treedick2011 2 points3 points ago

I was already banned.

[–]fartsmoker 3 points4 points ago

Double banned.

[–]sashathebrit 4 points5 points ago

To hell with creepshots.

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] -1 points0 points ago

fuck 'em right in the ear

[–]WilyTackler 2 points3 points ago

Well maybe they shouldn't be invading womens privacy in the first damn place.

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 4 points5 points ago

Yes this is 1000% true.

However, turning over someone's complete personal information to the entire world is an EXTREMELY dangerous act. There are some real nutjobs out there, and this guy could stand to get physically assaulted.

There are proper channels to follow, and vigilantism can lead to very unpredictable results, some which would drastically exceed established protocol and would violate fair trial rights.

The offender needs to have a trial for his crimes, not an internet tribunal.

[–]Hatch- -1 points0 points ago

Would you say he was... "asking for it"?

[–]WilyTackler -1 points0 points ago

I'm saying he should expect consequences for his illegal actions but if you want to make rape metaphors go right ahead.

[–]Hatch- 0 points1 point ago

I'm not sure why they wouldn't just go to the police with evidence instead of writing up this shit show on reddit? If they have enough evidence to get him charged and aren't turning it in then they're basically giving a pedo the go-ahead to either molest or creep shoot another person, and that's just fucking terrible. Not that SRS is full of level headed people... but I would think they would know better than this.

[–]arthen78 1 point2 points ago

Creepshots is breaking the law and possibly posting child porn, fuck you if you think I'm going to protect them.

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] -1 points0 points ago

Yes this is 1000% true.

However, turning over someone's complete personal information to the entire world is an EXTREMELY dangerous act. There are some real nutjobs out there, and this guy could stand to get physically assaulted.

There are proper channels to follow, and vigilantism can lead to very unpredictable results, some which would drastically exceed established protocol and would violate fair trial rights.

The offender needs to have a trial for his crimes, not an internet tribunal.

[–]DonaldJDarko -1 points0 points ago

What are you shit talking? Nowhere do they say they're going to post his information online.
The guy apparently lives in Toronto, they can just as easily send their evidence and information to the Toronto police.

I think SRS did a good job closing down that thread. I'm sure at least of some of the pictures on there were from underaged girls. Because guys uploading pictures like that in the first place are horrible enough to get an even bigger kick from the younger ones. Not even speaking about the fact that posting pictures of people without their approval is illegal, let alone pictures invading their privacy.

I wouldn't mind one single bit if that guy would get "physically assaulted". If you're going to do something as stupid as that, openly starting something illegal, you deserve no protection.

That said, I'm not saying they should post his details online.
Just... Don't automatically assume something when there is no evidence supporting it. My guess is they'll contact Toronto authority.

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 3 points4 points ago

He has already had his personal info doxxed.

I mean, the body of this says "We have your personal information. Don't try to deny it. Do X,Y,Z, or we are going to do something else for you."

Based on the context, the discussion pretty well hints to use of that personal information.

I wouldn't mind one single bit if that guy would get "physically assaulted". If you're going to do something as stupid as that, openly starting something illegal, you deserve no protection.

Murderers have protection. Rapists have protection. This guy hasn't even had a trial yet. We can't just go medieval and let everyone resort to their own means of justice. I couldn't support a government that conducts physical punishments on unconvicted citizens, or even implicit endorsement of it through mobs by its own negligence.

Furthermore, this message is in direct violation of reddit standards. Just because someone is violating himself, it doesn't give anyone else to join in violating other rules. It's a little bit too much "Chaotic Neutral" for my taste.

[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points ago

Yes, use of that information. Again, they might just as well contact Toronto police. Which is not in violation of any rules. If anyone on reddit was able to get his details it will be his own fault. It's not exactly impossible to stay anonymous on reddit. If you're going to do something illegal, you should at least be smart enough to completely withhold any personal information. And I never said he should get assaulted based on his information online. I was more going for the someone-catching-him-and-accompanying-boyfriend/brother-beating-him-up kind of way.

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 1 point2 points ago

Calling Toronto police would be the best action.

[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points ago

In my opinion it is the only option. :)
They would break the law posting his information online. :)

[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points ago

You did a bad job covering up. The account name is CreeperComforts, which is not only in the message but also readable under the white-out.

So is his name.

Edited his name because I'm so nice..

[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 0 points1 point ago

Not my white-out. This is an existing imgur.

[–]fartsmoker -2 points-1 points ago

You have just been banned from r/shitredditsays.

[–]The_Lesser_Baldwin 0 points1 point ago

You're not a proper redditor until your banned from SRS. It's like a rite of passage, just like getting banned from /r/pyongyang.