use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. reddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
reddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
4,903 users here now
New Rules:
All (& only) things that make you say WTF. The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts for not being WTF and would be more appropriate in more relevant subreddits.
Thanks to licenseplate for the excellent logo & thanks to humansmartbomb for the previous logo
Please DO NOT post personal information
Such posts or comments will be removed and offenders may be banned. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.
Shout Outs:
/r/weird
/r/creepy
/r/creepy_gif
/r/offbeat
/r/WTFart
/r/NSFW_WTF
/r/sfw_wtf
/r/BugWars
/r/awesome
/r/toosoon
/r/mildlyinteresting
/r/FanTheories
New: /r/tifu
New: /r/MorbidReality
New: FUCK GAWKER
Exceptions to the rules can be granted by the moderators; The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
SRS Moderators are allowed to do this to other Redditors. (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 day ago by AnotherClosetAtheist
[–]treedick2011 11 points12 points13 points 1 day ago
SRS needs to be banned. This is what happens when you get moral high grounders power. They are trying to threaten and coerce morality. I don't care if that shit stain of a sub reddit wants to sit there and bitch about shit they don't agree with.
Hell, i say this for anyone. If you want to sit on your front porch and scream and rant and rave about your ideology to people walking by, thats fucking fine. That is your prerogative. However, once those rants and raves turn to threats with actual teeth behind them, you are a danger. This shouldn't be allowed, and the admins should trash them all.
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 6 points7 points8 points 1 day ago
Violating peoples' privacy for sexual pleasure is a crime, and the violator needs a legal trial.
However, internet vigilantism could lead to some psycho to actually murder the guy, which is a worse crime than the pictures.
[–]fartsmoker 3 points4 points5 points 1 day ago
You have just been banned from r/shitredditsays.
[–]treedick2011 2 points3 points4 points 1 day ago
I was already banned.
Double banned.
[–]arthen78 -9 points-8 points-7 points 1 day ago
This is not a forum for child porn, take your bullshit elsewhere.
what the fuck are you talking about child porn?
[–]arthen78 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago
Posting upskirts of girls that haven't verified their age treads into potential child pornography.
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 2 points3 points4 points 1 day ago
the guy did a super-shitty thing. however, internet vigilantism opens up this guy to every potential psychopath out there.
he needs a legal trial following due process. what he did is a crime, and we have societies and laws and structure and procedure to wrangle in our violent retaliatory impulses and apply justice.
allowing SRS to act this way is an implicit endorsement of vigilantism. if everyone was a vigilante, stuff would get really messed up really fast.
we need to focus on the crime that was committed, and follow legal venues.
[–]sashathebrit 4 points5 points6 points 1 day ago
To hell with creepshots.
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] -1 points0 points1 point 1 day ago
fuck 'em right in the ear
[–]WilyTackler 2 points3 points4 points 1 day ago
Well maybe they shouldn't be invading womens privacy in the first damn place.
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 4 points5 points6 points 1 day ago
Yes this is 1000% true.
However, turning over someone's complete personal information to the entire world is an EXTREMELY dangerous act. There are some real nutjobs out there, and this guy could stand to get physically assaulted.
There are proper channels to follow, and vigilantism can lead to very unpredictable results, some which would drastically exceed established protocol and would violate fair trial rights.
The offender needs to have a trial for his crimes, not an internet tribunal.
[–]Hatch- -1 points0 points1 point 1 day ago
Would you say he was... "asking for it"?
[–]WilyTackler -1 points0 points1 point 1 day ago
I'm saying he should expect consequences for his illegal actions but if you want to make rape metaphors go right ahead.
[–]Hatch- 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago
I'm not sure why they wouldn't just go to the police with evidence instead of writing up this shit show on reddit? If they have enough evidence to get him charged and aren't turning it in then they're basically giving a pedo the go-ahead to either molest or creep shoot another person, and that's just fucking terrible. Not that SRS is full of level headed people... but I would think they would know better than this.
[–]arthen78 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago
Creepshots is breaking the law and possibly posting child porn, fuck you if you think I'm going to protect them.
[–]DonaldJDarko -1 points0 points1 point 1 day ago
What are you shit talking? Nowhere do they say they're going to post his information online. The guy apparently lives in Toronto, they can just as easily send their evidence and information to the Toronto police.
I think SRS did a good job closing down that thread. I'm sure at least of some of the pictures on there were from underaged girls. Because guys uploading pictures like that in the first place are horrible enough to get an even bigger kick from the younger ones. Not even speaking about the fact that posting pictures of people without their approval is illegal, let alone pictures invading their privacy.
I wouldn't mind one single bit if that guy would get "physically assaulted". If you're going to do something as stupid as that, openly starting something illegal, you deserve no protection.
That said, I'm not saying they should post his details online. Just... Don't automatically assume something when there is no evidence supporting it. My guess is they'll contact Toronto authority.
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 3 points4 points5 points 1 day ago
He has already had his personal info doxxed.
I mean, the body of this says "We have your personal information. Don't try to deny it. Do X,Y,Z, or we are going to do something else for you."
Based on the context, the discussion pretty well hints to use of that personal information.
Murderers have protection. Rapists have protection. This guy hasn't even had a trial yet. We can't just go medieval and let everyone resort to their own means of justice. I couldn't support a government that conducts physical punishments on unconvicted citizens, or even implicit endorsement of it through mobs by its own negligence.
Furthermore, this message is in direct violation of reddit standards. Just because someone is violating himself, it doesn't give anyone else to join in violating other rules. It's a little bit too much "Chaotic Neutral" for my taste.
[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago
Yes, use of that information. Again, they might just as well contact Toronto police. Which is not in violation of any rules. If anyone on reddit was able to get his details it will be his own fault. It's not exactly impossible to stay anonymous on reddit. If you're going to do something illegal, you should at least be smart enough to completely withhold any personal information. And I never said he should get assaulted based on his information online. I was more going for the someone-catching-him-and-accompanying-boyfriend/brother-beating-him-up kind of way.
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago
Calling Toronto police would be the best action.
In my opinion it is the only option. :) They would break the law posting his information online. :)
[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago*
You did a bad job covering up. The account name is CreeperComforts, which is not only in the message but also readable under the white-out.
So is his name.
Edited his name because I'm so nice..
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago
Not my white-out. This is an existing imgur.
[–]fartsmoker -2 points-1 points0 points 1 day ago
[–]The_Lesser_Baldwin 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago
You're not a proper redditor until your banned from SRS. It's like a rite of passage, just like getting banned from /r/pyongyang.
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–]treedick2011 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]fartsmoker 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]treedick2011 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]fartsmoker 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]sashathebrit 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]WilyTackler 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]Hatch- -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]WilyTackler -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Hatch- 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]arthen78 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]DonaldJDarko -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]DonaldJDarko 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]AnotherClosetAtheist[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]fartsmoker -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]The_Lesser_Baldwin 0 points1 point2 points ago