this post was submitted on
290 points (87% like it)
337 up votes 47 down votes

proper

unsubscribe17,477 readers

~4 users here now

HEAR, HEAR:

Please grace us with the honour of your esteemed presence, for dignified discussion of the finer things and pursuits. Foppishness strongly encouraged.

No direct referrals to merchants will be tolerated, however you may bring them up if the topic in question calls for it.

Unabashed memery shall be frowned upon

created by zobiera community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 6 comments

[–]The Right HonourableJeremyKylesLovechild 4 points5 points ago

Egad. Are we to be subjected to a tidal wave of Downton Abbey gubbins? I may be forced to fill my pockets with stones and take a walk in the lake.

[–]Saydrah 2 points3 points ago

My good sir! The mere suggestion of subjecting a gentleman's noble garments to such watery torment raises my eyebrows nearly to the wig line! Certainly, a nude aquatic constitutional is out of the question; a gentleman of your rank and position simply cannot be seen to abandon his vestments in the public square. However, submerging a fine overcoat, or even simply one's breeches and waistcoat, makes a mockery of your seamstress's detailed and meticulous work. Would you have a woman in your employ perceive that you value her contribution to the distinguished appearance of your noble personage as little as a child values skipping stones?

[–]The Right HonourableJeremyKylesLovechild 1 point2 points ago

T'would not matter to me, since I would continue my meander until such time that the murky water fills my lungs completely and carries me off to the next world, where I intend to arrive suitably attired.

[–]Saydrah 1 point2 points ago

This DOES present a conundrum, I will allow. 'Tis indubitably scurrilous and uncouth to submerge one's person in the lake, if for no other reason than that the wretched undertaker must later prepare a sodden and reeking body for funereal services. A gentleman's dignity suffers much when he behaves in a manner which needlessly causes suffering to the classes unfortunate enough to require professional employment in order to finance their subsistence. Nevertheless, I cannot argue that it it impossible to visit this great shame upon your honor following your departure from the earthly realm.

I must, then, appeal to your belief in a world beyond this one. You have referred to the "next world." Is it earnestly your belief that this next world will be absent any theory of moral behavior? If so, I shudder to think at the company you shall enjoy there! Louts and ruffians, allowed to commit unchecked mischief? Heaven forfend! If, upon the hand opposite, you do believe that a certain ethical standard must be met in order to enter into the ideal next world, then I suggest that you await the Creator's judgment upon when your breath should cease to issue from your lungs. Taking this decision upon yourself would surely serve to offend and reduce the likelihood that the Creator may nominate you to his heavenly club.

[–]The Right Honourablecitizen_dick 10 points11 points ago

Preposterous, I will not be lectured in manners by a crude photoshoppe which hurts ones eyes. Furthermore, the ineptitude involved in making this abomination only serves to bring forth the irony - lecturing others for having no style when you yourself have none!

Madam, go back from whence you came from - those abominations the plebs call "mainstream subreddits" which attract only the most petite of the petite bourgeoisie!

Hmpf!

[–]Dr.xander05[S] 2 points3 points ago

I would be remiss not to include the original submission. Cheers to you, sir or madam!