top 200 commentsshow all 230

[–]jjswee 483 points484 points ago

Honestly, I thought it was way bigger than that.

[–]SquareRoot 140 points141 points ago

In other words, if the US was at that distance from the Earth, it would roughly be the size of the moon facing us.

[–]monolithfiji 68 points69 points ago

Whoa

[–]H3000 15 points16 points ago

[–]demonsurge 7 points8 points ago

I cant help but read that as 'woooooo - ah' instead of 'whoa'

[–]H3000 4 points5 points ago

I know, first I typed /r/whoadude, but you can check and see where that takes you yourself.

[–]josephhhhh 0 points1 point ago

a mini fucking united states.

[–]clarkclark 0 points1 point ago

woah

[–]H3000 7 points8 points ago

I'm now imagining what it would look like to see an entire continent floating in space like that.

[–]TheAdAgency 45 points46 points ago

see an entire continent floating in space

Full Moon USA

[–]option_i 3 points4 points ago

Forgot Canada and Mexico.... That's only the contiguous U.S.

[–]techtakular 0 points1 point ago

I wonder.... what the rest or the planet would look like if it where that faraway as well?

[–]DrMarioLutherKing 0 points1 point ago

Look at the picture "Earthrise"

[–]aspartame_junky 4 points5 points ago

accusations that the full USA looking bigger at the horizon as being just an optical illusion are soon decried as "anti-American" by Fox News.

[–]Pxzib 0 points1 point ago

My imagination and awe went wild for a second there.

[–]elperroborrachotoo 19 points20 points ago

That requires experimental confirmation.Maybe if we swapped the US and the moon...

[–]SleweD 9 points10 points ago

Oh if only... The problems we'd solve, the helium we'd gain...

[–]DresdenPI 1 point2 points ago

Wouldn't most of the helium remain on the US? I thought we wanted to stop helium from going into space.

[–]SleweD 1 point2 points ago

There's Helium-3 on the Moon too, we can use it for more things like nuclear fusion because it's rarely found on Earth.

[–]sharlos 4 points5 points ago

we can use it for more things like nuclear fusion because it's rarely found on Earth

Not for many decades we can't. We can't even create simple useful controlled fusion reactions yet.

[–]elperroborrachotoo 1 point2 points ago

Hail Helium!

[–]Sev456 -1 points0 points ago

Upvote for John Carter reference

[–]avsa 5 points6 points ago

So you mean that's the size the astronauts saw it then? But then, Neil described earth as a blue speck he could cover with his thumb. The scale is lost on the photographs.

[–]ErnieHemingway 25 points26 points ago

His thumb was very close to his eye.

[–]virnovus 22 points23 points ago

Also, he was wearing really huge gloves.

[–]greenyellowbird 4 points5 points ago

You know what they say about astronauts with big gloves...

[–]Whipfather 13 points14 points ago

...Their thumbs are really close to their eyes.

[–]inaproton 7 points8 points ago

Because of their huge penis.

[–]jt004c 12 points13 points ago

That description is terribly misleading. I would hardly describe the moon in our sky as a "spec," and the Earth is much larger than the moon.

The Earth in the moon's sky would look almost four times larger than what we see when we look up at the moon from Earth.

edit: For all the confused people below, avsa is not trying to reference the famous Carl Sagan quote "pale blue dot." He is referencing this quote from Jim Lowell:

"We learned a lot about the Moon, but what we really learned was about the Earth. The fact that just from the distance of the Moon, you can put your thumb up, and you can hide the Earth behind your thumb. Everything that you have ever known, your loved ones, your business, the problems of the Earth itself, all behind your thumb. And how insignificant we really all are. But then how fortunate we are to have this body, and to be able to enjoy living here amongst the beauty of the Earth itself."

Note that the quote is both accurate but misleading in our context here.

[–]sweetgreggo 19 points20 points ago

Experiment time, kids! View the above image in your phone. Hold it away from you until the size of the moon in the photo is the same size as you see the moon on Earth.

Now you know what the Earth looks like if you're standing on the moon!

[–]Hedgehogs4Me 0 points1 point ago

Is it really that big, or am I just overestimating the size of the moon? I'm definitely too lazy to take my laptop out at night to compare, but it seems like the Earth would cover a pretty fair portion of the sky from the moon.

It's really interesting that I'm having a hard time picturing it even after seeing the footage and whatnot. Is there a panorama or anything like that available? I mean, I guess they had other priorities when they went to the moon all those times, but you'd think someone would come up with something, right?

[–]Hedgehogs4Me 0 points1 point ago

Still looks pretty small. Could be either the lens or my overestimation of the moon. Nothing quite compares to being there and seeing for yourself, I suppose. Thanks for the image!

[–]Parmeniscus 8 points9 points ago

It's not the description that's misleading - it was Carl Sagan, he wasn't just talking bullshit.

It's that avsa mistook Carl as talking from the point of view of the moon, when on fact Carl was much further out in space looking back on the Earth, like from the Voyager spacecraft. From that distance it does look like a spec, and the moon isn't even visible.

[–]irish711 8 points9 points ago

[–]wintermutt 0 points1 point ago

pale blue bot

Good username idea!

[–]jt004c 1 point2 points ago

He was more likely trying to reference this quote from Jim Lovell:

"We learned a lot about the Moon, but what we really learned was about the Earth. The fact that just from the distance of the Moon, you can put your thumb up, and you can hide the Earth behind your thumb. Everything that you have ever known, your loved ones, your business, the problems of the Earth itself, all behind your thumb. And how insignificant we really all are. But then how fortunate we are to have this body, and to be able to enjoy living here amongst the beauty of the Earth itself."

[–]jt004c 1 point2 points ago

Avsa wasn't referencing the famous pale blue dot quote. It would be pretty silly if he was. He was talking about this, from Jim Lovell:

"We learned a lot about the Moon, but what we really learned was about the Earth. The fact that just from the distance of the Moon, you can put your thumb up, and you can hide the Earth behind your thumb. Everything that you have ever known, your loved ones, your business, the problems of the Earth itself, all behind your thumb. And how insignificant we really all are. But then how fortunate we are to have this body, and to be able to enjoy living here amongst the beauty of the Earth itself."

And if you work out the math, Jim Lowell is actually right. An astronaut could cover the Earth with their thumb from the moon, but the quote is still misleading.

[–]Parmeniscus 0 points1 point ago

Nice. I think you're right now that I read his comment again. I thought he was being silly, so glad to see I was wrong.

[–]SMZ72 2 points3 points ago

Here's an interesting video that shows what the Earth would look like in orbit compared to the Moon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNlLnaJiGY8

[–]virnovus 2 points3 points ago

I thought he referred to it as a "blue marble". There is a "blue speck" picture that one of the Voyager probes took of the Earth from much further away. Carl Sagan wrote a book with this photo as the cover. Maybe that's what you're thinking of?

[–]ethan829 3 points4 points ago

Neil deGrasse Tyson just tweeted yesterday that if you looked through a drinking straw, the moon would just fill it. So I guess roughly 4 times larger than that would still be covered by your thumb.

[–]fit4130 7 points8 points ago

What kind of straw? Coffee stirring straw? Regular drinking straw, McDonalds McFlurry straw? One of those giant Pixie Stix straws that is about 5/8 of an inch in diameter?

Also, length comes into play. The longer the straw the less sky you will see.

Neil, we need specifics!

[–]xsdc 3 points4 points ago

not to mention how close to your eye you hold it.

[–]Astrokiwi 1 point2 points ago

But then, Neil described earth as a blue speck he could cover with his thumb.

The moon is about half a degree across from here. If you hold one finger out with your arm fully extended, that covers about a degree. The Earth's radius is about 3.5 times that of the moon, so form the moon it'd be under 2 degrees. So a thumb in a thick glove at arm's length would be about right.

[–]Xet 0 points1 point ago

That is a very interesting juxtaposition you did right there actually, because it makes me think the U.S should be smaller than the moon.

[–]WordsNotToLiveBy 1 point2 points ago

Just based on this image, if the USA were to be in space, it's body mass would be compressed into a ball. And by the looks of it would be about 2/3rds(-ish) the size of the moon. Maybe even less.

[–]csl110 -1 points0 points ago

USA! USA!

[–]question_all_the_thi -1 points0 points ago

Or Brazil, or Australia.

[–]Canadia86 -1 points0 points ago

I wish the US was that distance from the Earth. Am I right?!

[–]speek 2 points3 points ago

Because then the US would feel no repercussions to its attempts to shit all over the earth, amirite?

[–]ISHOULDSTARTDRINKING 18 points19 points ago

And I the same! Thanks for this OP!

[–]The_Dorklord 4 points5 points ago

The crazy part is, it's bigger than Pluto o___o

[–]jjswee 0 points1 point ago

[–]Magik-Waffle 3 points4 points ago

I must be retarded. I always assumed it was the size of, like, Texas or something.

[–]jjswee 6 points7 points ago

Well, to help your cause, everything IS bigger in texas.

[–]JMaboard 1 point2 points ago

That's what she said.

[–]pocket_eggs 0 points1 point ago

I don't know, the US is pretty big.

[–]Bradleywyros 0 points1 point ago

That Neil Armstrong's full of shit, man.

[–]Tron22 0 points1 point ago

It kind of is, is it not? Flat image over a rounded surface?

[–]goodduck 94 points95 points ago

the circumference of the moon is 6784 miles (10917 km). The race distance record at the 24 hours of Le Mans is 3360 miles (5410 km). Alex Roy drove from New York to Los Angeles 2794 miles (4496 km) in 31 hours.

TLDR I'm going to drive around the moon in 48 hours

[–]hatperigee 57 points58 points ago

which he covered at an average speed of 90.1 mph

With no atmospheric drag, you could do much better!

Also, his record is a bit bullshit.. given that it's on public roads and well above most speed limits. If everyone could attempt, it would surely be broken.

[–]anotherkenny 25 points26 points ago

It's more impressive a (terribly dangerous) record without closed roads. No one should attempt it.

[–]Hedgehogs4Me 3 points4 points ago

I wonder how fast you'd have to go to achieve orbit after driving off the side of a crater.

[–]Anti-antimatter 3 points4 points ago

You couldn't achieve orbit just from driving up a ramp at any speed unless you get an assist from a nearby body of influence and even then, it would be a pretty unstable orbit as that body could just as easily knock you back out of orbit.

[–]dyt 1 point2 points ago

well that isn't true at all.

[–]Anti-antimatter 1 point2 points ago

Care to expand on that?

[–]dyt 0 points1 point ago

Sorry I was a bit busy when I wrote that. But if you hit a ramp at a 45 degree angle, going at high velocities, high enough that you would gain the deltaV required to get into an orbital insertion, I see no reason that a ramp would not be possible. You might be thinking of just a lunar rover, but if you had a high speed rover with a rocket engine on the back, it is possible that you could attain orbital velocity. Sure you wouldn't have a circular orbit, but I believe you could attain an elliptical orbit.

I could be wrong though, what's your thoughts?

[–]Anti-antimatter 0 points1 point ago

I think that shooting something into orbit (this example can be modeled as such) is impossible without assistance. Slightly confusing to explain. Try drawing a moon on some paper and then draw the orbital path of an object, the point at which acceleration stopped needs to be somewhere along that line. If you were launched from the surface, circling around would leave you back at the ramp instead of in an orbit.

[–]HitokiriDarkAngel 0 points1 point ago

When you go into orbit, or even when you fall, you fall in an ellipse pattern. This means you will return to your starting point, meaning you would have to travel underground, if you are starting on the ground going up.

[–]Arve 0 points1 point ago

Assuming the crater is a vertical wall, and you're able to drive up a vertical wall: 2.4 km/s, or a tad over mach 7.

[–]HitokiriDarkAngel 1 point2 points ago

Not true at all. You would either fall back down in a straight line or continue indefinitely in a straight line, if you escaped the moon's gravity. Vertical lift will not put you into orbit. You need a horizontal velocity.

[–]Arve 0 points1 point ago

Fair point - I was merely quoting a speed slightly faster than the escape velocity for the moon.

[–]Hedgehogs4Me 0 points1 point ago

So... get out the superchargers, then?

[–]shivvvv 0 points1 point ago

you'd probably gain extra speed due to the necessity of outrunning local law enforcement, so i say it's an unfair advantage.

[–]LeonardNemoysHead 11 points12 points ago

But you also don't have the traction to put your full horsepower onto the surface.

[–]Splitshadow 0 points1 point ago

[SPOILER] you'd need a huge one in that atmosphere.

[–]LeonardNemoysHead 0 points1 point ago

I don't think I need to explain why spoilers won't work on the moon.

[–]Arve 9 points10 points ago

With no atmospheric drag, you could do much better!

With no atmospheric drag, you'd do much worse. No oxygen means no internal combustion engine, meaning batteries. You could drive hard for an hour, and then wait for 12 hours for a battery charge.

[–]BlazeOrangeDeer 2 points3 points ago

Also no atmosphere means no air cooling, your engine would heat up and die.

[–]wlievens 0 points1 point ago

You could bring your own oxygen, no?

[–]Arve 6 points7 points ago

Not if this is anything to go by - you'd need 3.78 kg of oxygen for every kg of fuel burned.

[–]Arve 2 points3 points ago

Further: Assuming liquid oxygen at 1146 g/L, that would work out as about 3.3 L of liquid oxygen per L of fuel.

Now, also, there are no filling stations on the moon, so you'd have to start with tanks of both big enough to complete the 10197 km journey on your own.

If we assume a fuel-efficient car that only uses 10 L/100 km when driving at 90 mph over rough terrain, you would need 10917/10, in other words, about 1100 L of petrol and 3600 L of oxygen. Assuming a cubic fuel tank, we're looking at a tank of 16.7 m in either direction.

[–]hatperigee 0 points1 point ago

Combustion or batteries? Pfft. Nuclear!

[–]Arve 1 point2 points ago

[–]hatperigee 0 points1 point ago

Now we're talking!

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]LeroyJenkems 2 points3 points ago

You filmed yourself driving at 88 mph? gtfo

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]JakeCameraAction 2 points3 points ago

One gauge says 125mph, the other 119.

[–]homeworld 2 points3 points ago

6.3 miles per gallon??

[–]q1o2 2 points3 points ago

digital gauge starts at 91. pay attention!

[–]DruePhoenix 0 points1 point ago

not as much flat ground, though

[–]fotiphoto 0 points1 point ago

There were records set on a 10 mile oval on the salt lake beds. Some of those records still stand. Ab Johnson was his name. All the way from 10 mile timed run all the way up to 24 hour run for the record books.

[–]sxales 7 points8 points ago

Probably want to compare to the Dakar rally since it is off-road and they don't yet have road on the moon.

[–]LeonardNemoysHead 0 points1 point ago

Dakar would be a bit flat (on average), I think. Something in Iceland would do nicely, though.

edit Unless you're talking about the revised Dakar that goes through the Andes.

[–]VitQ 2 points3 points ago

But Fry, you've just been to moon. This morning. For doughnuts.

[–]LeonardNemoysHead 0 points1 point ago

Actually, you could get a decent feel for the amount of time this would actually take by looking at rally drivers. Especially in Iceland.

[–]jazzman_testifies -1 points0 points ago

The moons diameter is 2159 miles (3474.8 km). if it is 2794 miles from New York to Los Angeles, I dont think this illustration is 100% accurate.

[–]LeonardNemoysHead 8 points9 points ago

It's best to assume that image posts to space-related subreddits that try to convey information are terribly inaccurate.

[–]virnovus 3 points4 points ago

And, that's pretty much what's shown in the picture. The moon stretches about 80% of the distance between NY to LA.

[–]Rohm 61 points62 points ago

Neat picture, but if you really want to compare the two you'd want to use a projection of the moon: http://www.nhn.ou.edu/~jeffery/astro/moon/map/moon_map_002.jpg

Matching up the type of projections, of course (Mercator in this case).

[–]celestial_appetite 42 points43 points ago

That looks like elephant skin

[–]matteumayo 86 points87 points ago

Conclusion: Elephants are made of moon.

Alternate conclusion: The Moon is an elephant.

[–]harshael 22 points23 points ago

I thought it was turtles all the way down.

[–]THESALTEDPEANUT 4 points5 points ago

Is and always will be, cheese.

[–]IncoherentVoidParrot 6 points7 points ago

I choose to believe it is made of delicious barbecue spare ribs.

[–]acidOverride 0 points1 point ago

My anthropology-major girlfriend wants to say that she loves you.

[–]harshael 0 points1 point ago

So it goes.

[–]lickwid 0 points1 point ago

It's a snapshot of the The Great Atuin's shell!

[–]SvenHudson 0 points1 point ago

Turtles all the way down, elephants all the way up.

[–]MxM111 2 points3 points ago

Both are wrong conclusions. The right scientific one:

The Moon and elephants had common ancestors.

[–]aceoftrachs 2 points3 points ago

That is just lunacy.

[–]t_Lancer 1 point2 points ago

I thought it was cheese

[–]tekgnosis 0 points1 point ago

From a practical point of view, it makes it easier to envision a spherical elephant.

[–]HannahP945 0 points1 point ago

I'd love to see a moon trunk.

[–]leshake 2 points3 points ago

Correct, OP is comparing the circumference of the earth to the diameter of the moon. The the moons surface is actually Π times taller and longer than that (Π/2 if you are just taking the surface you can see in the picture).

[–]dred1367 0 points1 point ago

What number is Π?

[–]EdgarAllenNope 1 point2 points ago

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679

[–]Harachel 1 point2 points ago

pi

[–]kuroyaki 1 point2 points ago

Looks cylindrical to me.

[–]Reoh 0 points1 point ago

! Problem loading page.

...and the reddit tide strikes again.

[–]mrpappy 0 points1 point ago

Taking a while to load. Mirror please!

[–]Bortjort 0 points1 point ago

This is what it looks like when I try to make pancakes

[–]BlazeOrangeDeer -1 points0 points ago

Mercator in this case

ಠ_ಠ

[–]MagicMoon 20 points21 points ago

The moon has a surface area 7.4% that of the earth. Source

[–]IAmAHat_AMAA 29 points30 points ago

You need square brackets first and round brackets second.

[–]Jacksambuck 1 point2 points ago

Which makes its surface area about twice as big as Russia, the largest country on Earth.

[–]FlyingPirate 39 points40 points ago

Perfect. Big enough for the second USA

[–]phoenetix 13 points14 points ago

you mean spaceball city?

[–]arma358 7 points8 points ago

On spaceball one with President Skroob.

[–]phoenetix 0 points1 point ago

bad joke. america would§ will terraform the proper shit into that place.

[–]brodiemann 9 points10 points ago

America II: Lunar Bugaloo!

[–]Mattho 0 points1 point ago

Moon has two sides, I bet Russia would fit there :)

[–]ErikAllenAwake 14 points15 points ago

It looks like the guy who drew that map did the coasts deliberately, ran out of time and just started guessing in the Midwest.

[–]virnovus 2 points3 points ago

Based on the way the picture is printed, it was probably done around the same time the US landed a man on the moon, so this whole thing would have been drawn by hand. The artist probably projected an outline of the US border and traced that, but then got hung up because the border between the US and Canada goes through the great lakes. So he kind of fudged the great-lakes area border to try and make it work.

[–]Disposable_Corpus 1 point2 points ago

And the entire Gulf Coast and border with Mexico.

[–]Granite-M 0 points1 point ago

Holy crap, and Vermont and New Hampshire, too! Yeesh!

[–]MrRogersMob 15 points16 points ago

The lack of boundary for the UP and Wisconsin is messing with me.

[–]astrogaijin 7 points8 points ago

Why did you have to mention this, now I can't stop seeing it.

[–]MrRogersMob 0 points1 point ago

Haha sorry

[–]Roentgenator 2 points3 points ago

It's important. Not just for geographic distinction, but also to distinguish the superior culture that is the UP. Ralph and me says so, ya know.

[–]GreenTeam 0 points1 point ago

I've never even been to Michigan but all I know is fuck that oven-mitt. UP FOR LIFE.

[–]the_real_thanos 1 point2 points ago

Fuck Delaware and New Jersey

E: And Alabama's access to the gulf, apparently

[–]MrRogersMob 5 points6 points ago

All of the states are wonky. Can't believe that I'm more distracted by the states than the size relation of the moon o_O

[–]HurricaneHugo 1 point2 points ago

It has been annex, you guys didn't get the memo?

Wisconsin was still mad over the refs in the Packers game so they gave them the UP as a consolation price.

[–]Lord_John_Marbury 5 points6 points ago

Ohio is well-drawn.

[–]jc316 5 points6 points ago

Missouri is drawn terribly.

[–]H3000 2 points3 points ago

Well I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize missourah!!

[–]threevolve 3 points4 points ago

This inspired me to make a nice 1920x1200 wallpaper, hope you like it:

http://i.imgur.com/CJDCV.jpg

[–]Taarguss 1 point2 points ago

Thank you!

[–]eleitl 2 points3 points ago

The surface is about as large as Africa.

[–]drewkungfu 3 points4 points ago

TIL I rode on my bicycle farther than the diameter of the moon. O_o whoa

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]The_Third_One 0 points1 point ago

[–]mooncougar13 0 points1 point ago

When you are the moon, there is a person people say is the sun. I saw the sun once, and he came past me, really fast. And it was an, it was called, the, an eclipse. And he came fast! But as he came past, I, I licked his back. And he doesn't know I licked his back! All in his yellow suit!... I'm the moon.

[–]Strideo 0 points1 point ago

What?

[–]splishwhine 1 point2 points ago

[–]velvetabyss 0 points1 point ago

Ok, just like everyone everyone else, I found this image is striking and initially somewhat surprising. But when you think about it, the Moon is notably smaller than the Earth, right? And the US dominates the width of the western hemisphere.

So, if someone were to point that out (Moon much smaller than the Earth, and how large the US is in relation to the half of the Earth we put it on maps) first, then show this overlay, it would not be as surprising. Which I think is interesting. It would seem we all know more than we tend to realize, if we'd just think things through more.

Next up: overlay Mars and the US (and be prepared for further surprise!).

[–]mikemccann 0 points1 point ago

I say all Americans leave the Earth to it's problems and colonize the moon.

[–]mason55 1 point2 points ago

Why is WV pointy?

[–]pauliesfreakin 1 point2 points ago

What a road-trip that would be...... Who's in?

[–]arma358 1 point2 points ago

Assuming we get to the Moon first, I would be. XD

[–]in_dog_we_trust 0 points1 point ago

What a horrible drawing of Maryland.

[–]Azulsky -1 points0 points ago

Mercator Projection might make this sorta inaccurate though?

[–]velvetabyss 0 points1 point ago

'Mercator Projection makes lots of things inaccurate!

[–]onelung 1 point2 points ago

Don't forget to x/post from /r/woahdude , give the smaller subreddits some attention!

[–]drizzlebent 1 point2 points ago

diameter of the earth = 12 756.2 kilometers diameter of the moon = 3 474.8 kilometers :Ratio is 3.59 to 1 diameter of a basketball = 23 cm diameter of a tennis ball = 6.7 cm : 3.43 to 1 The scale is pretty darn close, what numbers did you come up with.

[–]EgoOdyssey 0 points1 point ago

Where is this originally from?

[–]Jkempf71 0 points1 point ago

Quite interesting, thanks for posting it.

[–]BradleyPepper 0 points1 point ago

Why is New Jersey always drawn the worst on every map

[–]unbuklethis 1 point2 points ago

Puts earth to moons perspective.

[–]kersh2099 0 points1 point ago

I find it more interesting how large the craters are. Whenever we see the moon on movies they put lots of tiny craters everywhere that are about the size of football fields at most. Does anyone know if there would even be craters that small, or if meteorites that small wouldn't make a crater?

[–]SirPrize 0 points1 point ago

Whoa... I never realized this. That is crazy cool.

[–]yephesingoldshire -1 points0 points ago

The moon belongs to Merica

[–]Scotch_Banyon 0 points1 point ago

Thank God Washington State is safe from the Moon's lunar grasp.

[–]SummerDays -1 points0 points ago

I thought it's way smaller than that. Now imagine, if you drive all the way across the country, you won't even go half way around the Moon.(Keep in mind the moon is more curved.)

[–]WalrusKaput 0 points1 point ago

So ... On the moon, is the South still angry at the moon government and the Martians taking der jerbs?

[–]syllabic 0 points1 point ago

That can't be right. Even elephants are bigger than the moon.

[–]jefuchs 0 points1 point ago

interesting map. The Mississippi river goes nowhere near New Orleans.

[–]easygenius 0 points1 point ago

So it's just a little bit bigger than Texas.

[–]Ermagerdalerker 0 points1 point ago

looks like about 3.2 americas.

[–]NowTheyllNeverKnow 1 point2 points ago

I'm not sure if the USA is way bigger than I thought, or if the moon is way smaller than I thought...

[–]skeptical_spectacle 0 points1 point ago

That Dallas crater is really nice.

[–]TonyCubed 0 points1 point ago

I see where the Op is going with this. We move the Americans to the moon...

[–]Dannysmartful 0 points1 point ago

How 1950's :D

[–]escapist11 0 points1 point ago

Badly drawn Texas, haha

[–]Reinscorpion 0 points1 point ago

USA! USA!

[–]thefribbleingman 0 points1 point ago

Damn, I would be dead if this was a certain Zelda game...

[–]Stacksup 0 points1 point ago

This would be an awesome wallpaper if it was a better scan.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]thecoffee 0 points1 point ago

Probably, but I don't think Israel is large enough to give a decent comparison.

[–]zacpack11 1 point2 points ago

Canada Would be better eh.

[–]velvetabyss 0 points1 point ago

Land area of the US is larger than that of Canada. Part of that is dues to Alaska (ok, fair enough) but a HUGE part of that (perception vs reality) is that Canada is stretched out on rectangular maps (hint: the north pole isn't ~25k miles around)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

Well, that's because the moon belongs to America, and anxiously awaits the arrival of American astro-men. Will you be among them?

[–]virnovus 1 point2 points ago

The picture is from an old space book, which you can tell from the way it was printed. It was probably printed around the same time the US landed a man on the moon.

[–]TimesWasting -3 points-2 points ago

I'm sorry that we're doing that on an American website

[–]H3000 0 points1 point ago

That was the worst rebuttal possible.

[–]Jisaw -1 points0 points ago

So, it's the most important thing in the solar system, then?