Everything in that link is in the Bible. Right now.

Nothing was "cut out" of the Bible, anyway. Not like you're describing. There have been a lot of different versions and translations of various texts, and some have fairly large differences. And there have been a lot of books that were never canonized into the Bible. But saying that it was "cut out" would be like buying Time Life's Great Literature of the 20th Century and then complaining that they "cut out" a book. They didn't cut anything out. They just didn't include it.

Jesus was extremely popular in some groups, and a lot of stories were written about him. Some of these stories were almost believable, many of them were absurd (even by the standards of the time). Lots of them were popular, but had no significant backing in higher places. Take the Infancy Gospel of James. Awesome book, lots of hilarious stories about Jesus as a kid. It was very popular. But there's little evidence that people took it that seriously. It pretty much never had any real backing among the church leaders, and even the common folk didn't read it because they thought it was necessarily true. They thought it was cool, more than anything else.

Then you've got the books that argue with other books, sometimes directly. I mean, the modern Bible has a lot of contradictions as it is, but nothing compared to this. Some Christians thought that Jesus was sent by the "real" God to help us rise up and defeat the fake God of the Hebrews, whose real name was Yaldabaoth, and who was basically a Lovecraftian horror. Proto-orthodox Christians thought this was crazy. But at the time, there was serious competition between the two ideas.

Obviously, a lot of their texts didn't agree with each other. But you can't say that the winning group "cut out" the losing group's texts. They never believed in those texts in the first place!

The Bible is not, and should not be, considered a single, cohesive book, that can have chapters "cut out" of it. It's a collection of books, many which refer to other books contained in the Bible, others of which argue with some of those books, and still others which are re-writes and expansions of other books. (Matthew is a re-write of Mark, for example, that includes more "wise quotes from Jesus" and also changes a few things.) But the books have to be taken in the context of what they individually as well as what they are as part of a whole.

No one "wrote the Bible." Each book was written by a person, who drew upon other books he had read and stories he had heard. Each book was probably changed at some point, during copying, and there were likely multiple versions circulating around. One of these was popular/lucky enough to become the "main" version. Later books were written by people who, in many cases, had read the earlier books, and wanted to elaborate or comment on part of them. A lot of these never made it anywhere. Some managed to make it into the "bible" themselves.

This post is mostly concerning the New Testament. The Hebrew Bible is similar in many places, but I'm pretty sure that it actually does have some passages that were written by committee.