this post was submitted on
3,043 points (57% like it)
11,180 up votes 8,137 down votes

pics

subscribe2,393,603 readers

5,500 users here now

Looking for an image subreddit with minimal rules? Check out /r/images

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
/r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]stillnotking 668 points669 points ago

Hello 2012 people,

Hope you're enjoying your flying cars and remembering to take your food pills! Can't wait to meet you!

Sincerely,
The 1950s

[–]CletusAwreetus 328 points329 points ago

Everything you thought would be awesome about the future has been replaced by the internet. Robots aren't our slaves and we're still eating and driving cars with wheels like saps. So sorry. On the upside, porn is fantastic now..so there's that.

[–]iamagainstit 194 points195 points ago

this is pretty accurate. cars and planes and stuff haven't changed that much in the last 50 years, but we do now have magic hand held super computers that tell us pretty much anything we want to know in seconds.

[–]BroadSideOfABarn 190 points191 points ago

The smart phone is basically The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

[–]charliek_ 425 points426 points ago

The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy SIII

I'm sorry, I'll show myself out

[–]KariasMike 145 points146 points ago

Nice try viral marketing team at Samsung.

-Copyright © 2012 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.

[–]Buckwhal 96 points97 points ago

All rights reserved.

[–]fairwayks 86 points87 points ago

Every single fucking right and some we haven't thought of rights reserved.

[–]Buckwhal 7 points8 points ago

Quick, put them on page 63 of the iTunes end user license agreement! They'll never know!

[–]on_the_redpill 8 points9 points ago

(pbuh)

[–]Notpan 4 points5 points ago

I would seriously be worried about getting sued for that comment.

[–]kristian444 14 points15 points ago

Precisely why I have "DON'T PANIC" written on my SII's lock screen in large, friendly letters.

[–]wolfgame 20 points21 points ago

I, uhh, buh... well shit. ... wait! the microfiber cloth is just a miniaturized towel!

[–]OwlOwlowlThis 26 points27 points ago

Then, suddenly, out of nowhere, Samsungs cheesy naming scheme made sense.

Also, I had no idea Stewie was supposed to be british.

[–]space_boat 6 points7 points ago

He was born in America to American parents. He's American.

[–]quantumG7 27 points28 points ago

I think I'm doing it wrong. There's no large friendly letters on mine, just a picture of a half eaten apple!

[–]BobTehCat 52 points53 points ago

Turn your iPhone around.

[–]la_cow 10 points11 points ago

Don't Panic!

[–]Howzitgowen 6 points7 points ago

But they tell us a bit more about the Earth than "mostly harmless".

[–]swartz77 4 points5 points ago

Or a Pipboy.

[–]TheKronk 23 points24 points ago

To be fair, the cars can park themselves now. Which is still pretty awesome.

[–]el___diablo 16 points17 points ago

And some can even drive themselves.

[–]SombreDusk 3 points4 points ago

They could since the 80s

[–]Amunium 30 points31 points ago

Well, technically they could drive themselves since about 1880 if you'd just weigh down the accelerator. It's the avoiding obstacles and not crashing part that's been causing trouble.

[–]el___diablo 24 points25 points ago

Thank you Michael.

[–]farmerfound 16 points17 points ago

well, and planes MOSTLY fly themselves and cars will, in the next 10 years soon drive themselves. But seriously, how did people back then live without free Internet porn?

[–]Thethoughtful1 9 points10 points ago

cars will, in the next 10 years soon drive themselves.

I hope we get ubiquitous self-driving cars soon. Human drivers are so inefficient. They require signs, headlights, turn signals, speed limits, lanes, stop lights, etc.

Wikipedia has a short list of possible advantages of autonomous cars.

[–]goldandguns 13 points14 points ago

Not to mention mind-shattering wonder medication that can fix pretty much everything.

I never understood the food pills. Food is fucking fantastic. It's the best part of my day. Why would I eliminate the best part of my day?

[–]Mordekain 3 points4 points ago

Because sometimes you don't have the time/money for even a crappy meal and in those cases taking a couple pills sounds great.

[–]Maeby78 3 points4 points ago

Also, I'm sure there are people who would like to lose/maintain their weight without eating.

[–]this_is_a_recording0 8 points9 points ago

we have flying cars they're just too expensive

[–]ryangaston88 5 points6 points ago

I dunno, cars are different in that you can crash them and survive.

[–]smpx 16 points17 points ago

The best example of the Internet replacing everything is locationality. We envisioned pneumatic tubes that will take us to the post office or flying cars to the mall when our mobile phones can reach online stores or email instantly.

[–]CletusAwreetus 7 points8 points ago

It ain't the same as flying through the air in a tube, sob...

[–]iehova 8 points9 points ago

If you want, I can arrange to have you flown up to 10,000 feet, sealed in a plexiglas tube, and thrown out of the plane.

[–]CletusAwreetus 13 points14 points ago

That would be lovely.

[–]DrMonocle 34 points35 points ago

Yep. Wherever I go I carry a device I can use to communicate with anyone I know, read the latest news, look up any piece of information, get directions, read any book, or listen to any song.

Fuck flying cars and the horrible firey crashes they'd lead to. I'll never get lost on my way somewhere. I can send a message to Australia just as trivially as I can send a message across town. Modern technology is incredibly awesome.

[–]CletusAwreetus 25 points26 points ago

Jeez, I said porn was fantastic now, what do you want from me?

[–]RealityChickCheck 10 points11 points ago

If only we could make porn more futuristic. Scratch and sniff porn?

[–]Forever_Awkward 9 points10 points ago

I really don't like this idea for most of the stuff I watch..

[–]frenzyboard 11 points12 points ago

Yeah. Babies smell gross.

[–]NowInOz 15 points16 points ago

Australia here. Message received.

[–]pYrO1v1aniac 8 points9 points ago

If we had flying cars, they would inevitably be self driving.

Get in your car, tell it where to take you, it whisks you there at many times the speed of sound, you fap the whole way.

[–]Spider_Rapist 17 points18 points ago

you fap the whole way.

Be sure to look fellow commuters in the eye as you finish yourself off. To establish your dominance over that stretch of highway.

[–]myne 7 points8 points ago

As an Australian, I can confirm this took nearly no effort on my part to receive.

[–]fruit_basket 10 points11 points ago

Today I wrote down a phone number using a pencil and a piece of paper. Dammit, I feel like some caveman.

[–]zeronine 19 points20 points ago

Pen-cil? Is that from HTC?

[–]MrBoog 7 points8 points ago

Robots are most certainly our slaves.

[–]Jurily 41 points42 points ago

Speak for yourself, meatbag.

[–]RowdRunnah 19 points20 points ago

Interrogative: you want me to disintegrate this meat bag, master?

[–]CletusAwreetus 4 points5 points ago

Not to the point where they're doing all our work and we have 15 hour work weeks and disposable income, somehow. ITS WHAT WE WERE PROMISED AAARGH!!

[–]bronymobile 4 points5 points ago

See: Doomba

[–]HotwaxNinjaPanther 4 points5 points ago

Shhh, it can hear us. And it knows we have dirty floors.

[–]atheistjubu 15 points16 points ago

We got tablet PCs 300 years before they were invented in Star Trek. That ain't bad.

[–]WTFZerg 9 points10 points ago

I was reading a science-fiction novel the other day and they were talking about reading stuff off a data slate. I thought, "data slates sound pretty cool."

Then I realized I was reading the book on a Kindle Fire.

[–]buckie33 28 points29 points ago

Hello 1950s people,

Hope you're enjoying your super fast ships that can travel the Atlantic in 4 hours and super bred horses.

Sincerely,

The early 1900s

[–]demalo 9 points10 points ago

Hello 19th and 20th century peoples,

I hope you're able to keep your skin on your body as you travel more than 20 miles an hour on your steam driven locomotives. And what is this sorcery of electricity and photographs that we hear of?

Sincerely,

The 18th Century

[–]Drawtaru 19 points20 points ago

Hello more centuries than Glub can count,

Glub hope human can have fire. Glub jealous. Glub cold.

Sincerely, the Ice Age

[–]RudeTurnip 3 points4 points ago

This reminds me of a quote from Henry Ford, paraphrased: "If I asked customers what they wanted, I would just breed faster horses."

[–]paracelsus23 3 points4 points ago

Whoa. Driving cars is going to become what riding horses is today. Something that, with a few exceptions, most people do as a hobby / sport, not a primary means of conveyance.

[–]_Wolfos 3 points4 points ago

Well, he didn't mention a timeframe and I'm almost certain this will happen some day. Probably after the next dark age, though.

[–]Meat_Confetti 4 points5 points ago

Yeah, but what do we use for energy when we're crawling out of the Mad Max era come 2400 AD or so? All the accessible coal and petroleum will still be gone.

We took this planet's one-time endowment of billions of years of stored solar energy and put it in the gas tanks of SUVs and turned it into plastic shopping bags. Go us.

[–]DragonTycoon 3 points4 points ago

Heads up, Guys: 2001 LIES

[–]bachrock37 44 points45 points ago

According to Star Trek, I believe that would be New Berlin. Apparently we will be living there in 57 years.

[–]ThisIsFlight 10 points11 points ago

According to Freelancer, this is New Berlin.

[–]1rv 8 points9 points ago

I would trade 17 Sunslayer Torpedoes for a Freelancer 2.

[–]ThisIsFlight 17 points18 points ago

Can I point you to something

http://robertsspaceindustries.com/start/

code is '42'

[–]1rv 3 points4 points ago

Awesome news, I had no idea. Many thanks for the link.

[–]OvidPerl 8 points9 points ago

I used to live near the real city of New Berlin in Texas (near San Antonio). Many of the older folk there still spoke to one another in German. It was weird living in a German community in Texas.

[–]classic__schmosby 38 points39 points ago

From what I've heard we will most likely colonize the poles, as they will see a steadier temperature.

[–]VonAether 14 points15 points ago

And the poles are also more likely to have frozen water accessible in shadowed craters.

[–]challahcaust 34 points35 points ago

They tried that in 1939. It didn't really work out.

[–]dixiegunsmoke 9 points10 points ago

From what I had read, it would also be easier to build down instead of up.

All you have to do is dig a hole, slap an airlock on one end and make sure it is airtight. Plus to rock acts as insulation not to mention you might fund some resources mining.

[–]fubes2000 182 points183 points ago

Futurology is superstition and hokum.

Futuronomy is where the real science happens.

[–]skyman724 4 points5 points ago

Came here to see this.

Not because the Zodiac predicted it, mind you.

[–]Grabthelifeyouwant 27 points28 points ago

New Zealand is on the moon?

[–]thedugong 10 points11 points ago

Sweet as!

[–]metarinka 19 points20 points ago

Hopefully by then we will be using something more efficient than sodium vapor lights.

I predict that in my lifetime sodium vapor lights will fall out of use in the united states and people will reminisce over the golden-hued nightscapes.

[–]sharkeyzoic 34 points35 points ago

I predict that LED (or similar solid-state) lighting will get so cheap and so flexible that people will produce golden-hued LEDs just to get faux-sodium lighting on streets at night.

[–]ccfreak2k 6 points7 points ago

In the town I live in, several downtown street lights have been replaced with LED arrays. They're a blazing white color. It feels like I'm driving through a stadium every time I go there at night.

[–]paracelsus23 2 points3 points ago

Actually, sodium vapor replaced mercury vapor, due to greater efficiency and lower light pollution (mercury vapor is basically white with a blue green tint). So more of a return if anything.

[–]marviemundullo 4 points5 points ago

What movie is this?

[–]bonix 2 points3 points ago

Ahh I love that movie. Guy Pierce, the bad guy from DHwaV and Samantha Mumba in a movie about time travel!? They couldn't cram anymore awesome into that thing!

[–]listentomyfarts 5 points6 points ago

It took me a minute or two work out that DHwaV means Die Hard with a Vengeance. Does that movie come up in your daily life so much that it warrants a shorthand version?

[–]bonix 4 points5 points ago

yes.

[–]mcstafford 19 points20 points ago

That image really tweaked me for a moment there. I have never really considered that level of population to be likely, despite absolutely loving The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.

[–]cutthroattrick 15 points16 points ago

I feel like people are not understanding the awesomeness that is this image.

Whether or not it is possible, it is still an amazing thought. Yet we will never know what is to come in the far future.

[–]Gabetheoptimist 131 points132 points ago

Nope. A large population on the moon would be impractical and wouldn't be worth the expenses. It's basically a very hot and extremely cold desert with no atmosphere that you have to spend billions of dollars to move resources 384,400 km to and from.

In the future It might be good for research or just a tourism place for the extremely wealthy but that will probably be it.

...that was oddly pessimistic.

[–]TooSentimental 189 points190 points ago

Actually, there are two major resources that the moon has that will make it very strategic as space exploration becomes a bigger deal. And those are: much lower gravity than earth, and very little atmosphere.

These two resources mean that launching ships from the moon will be MUCH easier than launching them from the earth. So much so that it's reasonable to assume that we will run much of our space program from the moon.

As a result, I imagine a pretty sizable economy and population would develop around space exploration (mineral gathering from asteroids, etc).

[–]another1ofthose 206 points207 points ago

3 major resources...third being cheese.

[–]opaeoinadi 73 points74 points ago

Cheeeeese, Gromit!

[–]Scarbane 17 points18 points ago

Mmmm - Wensleydale!

[–]ramilehti[!] 17 points18 points ago

We've forgotten the crackers Gromit! We've forgotten the crackers!

[–]TooSentimental 17 points18 points ago

Can't believe I forgot. I'll just let myself out.

[–]another1ofthose 4 points5 points ago

No rush.

[–]Aquagoat 11 points12 points ago

We'll have the entire moon eaten within 13 years of our first moon colony. Then the tides get all wonky and before you know it we have shark people telling us what to do.

[–]JarHead413 2 points3 points ago

4....spare ribs.

[–]DorkJedi 2 points3 points ago

But why bother with fusion when the unfiltered sunlight is right there for the taking?

Too lazy to look up the numbers, but a yard of solar panel there would gather an order of magnitude more power than on earth. Enough so that putting a solar shield to reduce heat over a dome would more than poser that dome.

[–]arrayofeels 4 points5 points ago

Sorry, the earth´s atmosphere doesn´t remove nearly that much power from sunlight. The sun´s irradiance at the entrance to our atmosphere is only about 1.3 times as much as the "standard" irradiance down here at sea level. Although you would have the advantage that it would stay at that value all day and all year, rather than being attenuated by the sun´s angle and clouds and stuff.

[–]Qxzkjp 1 point2 points ago

Doesn't the atmosphere remove most of the UV, and isn't that the most energetic part of the sun's light?

[–]dixiegunsmoke 4 points5 points ago

Because fusion produces it consistently. In the shadow of the earth? the moon? Another spacecraft? No power for you.

Plus you can drop the Helium 3 to earth, and use it for power production there.

[–]Thethoughtful1 0 points1 point ago

The moon is seldom in the shadow of the earth.

[–]ICanBeAnyone 2 points3 points ago

Because in the picture the idiots built on the dark side of the moon ;).

[–]giranda 24 points25 points ago

Plus there is a shit ton of precious and rare metals in the moon's regolith and it's been theorized that giant solar farms could be built at the poles and the energy beamed back to Earth. If it ever happens is totally different.

[–]regalph 8 points9 points ago

It's always weirded me out that lots of people assume there would't be any resources that humans could use on Mars, when it and the Earth share a common origin and pretty similar compositions.

[–]CuriousAbra 14 points15 points ago

Because if you're willing to go mining other solar bodies, why go to an Earth-like planet when you can get the stuff straight from the source?

You want beryllium? We've got whole rocks made of the stuff, just floating. Waiting for someone to take them! Fuck mining, just drive up and cut off as big a piece as you can carry.

I'm reminded of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pDTiFkXgEE

[–]pooterpon 3 points4 points ago

We'd all be living in domes on mars is what bothers people.

[–]Overeacting 5 points6 points ago

Are we talking about the moon or Mars? I typed this whole thing assuming Mars but realized you might not have caught on board with regalph's random change of direction. I'll go ahead and post what I typed anyways:

Except it has an atmosphere filled with Nitrogen and CO2, it produces geothermal energy, the surface gravity is light at 38% of Earth but enough not to cause significant biological problems in humans... the major differences between it and Earth after proper terraforming (move all the ice to one or more central locations that can be lakes, make "factories" that pump out exorbitant amounts of greenhouse gases to warm the planet up, melting the ice and allowing bioengineered plant life to begin turning the CO2 into O2, figure out some way to make more water so you can start creating lakes and oceans) are minimal, and certainly nothing we can't overcome over, let's say, a hundred years. Not like the moon, which it's literally impossible to terraform since it isn't massive enough to have an atmosphere.

[–]needslipo 8 points9 points ago

I think there was an article posted recently saying the biggest impediment to mars colonization is the lack of a strong magnetic field to shield it from solar radiation. Without that, any atmosphere made by teraforming will just get blown away by solar winds.

[–]goldandguns 1 point2 points ago

I feel like we should be terraforming now. Send some kind of co2 bomb there, then see what happens. Bet you life will just spring up

[–]northenerinthesouth 2 points3 points ago

In theory, you can add water by smashing a few ice asteroid's into a planet, the heat of re-entry will put water vapour in the atmosphere, and put water into the ground too. Although obviously the temperature must be above freezing.

[–]DazzlerPlus 0 points1 point ago

Mars is at the bottom of a huge hole, its gravity well.

[–]canada1289 11 points12 points ago

The moon could make a reasonable "dry dock" for larger spacecraft designed for low gravity environments.

However, it might be more likely that space stations would be used for this purpose. having large self sustaining space stations in orbit around our planet would allow us to build ships in orbit, in a simulated zero gravity environment, and in in the vacuum of space... the medium through which the craft would travel anyway.

Though I'm sure the moon has some assets. Technically it could be used to test weapons, and dangerous experimental tests could be done there... with relatively low risk to life on earth.

[–]arkwald 10 points11 points ago

One downside to zero versus low gravity is that all of our fabrication techniques were developed on a 1G world. Dealing with liquids in space is a lot more complicated than dealing with them in a sizable gravity field. For example if I weld something on Earth whatever metallic spittle that comes off isn't going to travel far. In zero-g, however, that can keep traveling and with only radiative heating to cool off its going to stay hot much longer. Unless you take things like that into account your going to have equipment failures in a place where such things usually mean death.

I am not going to say these are insurmountable obstacles to doing this. However there is enough to make it a substantial engineering feat on its own.

[–]whosthatcat 5 points6 points ago

You're forgetting helium-3 and newt gingrichs dreams.

[–]bobbybusche 6 points7 points ago

I understand the two resources you're talking about, but the resources on the Moon (I know there are a lot but in order to produce factories to make specialized parts) don't add up to the necessary materials to build a space ship on the Moon. That would mean we would have to ship those materials via Earth to the Moon making it more expensive than just doing it from Earth. And im just curious. I'm not questioning your statement because if we could form a colony of some sort on the Moon that would kick ass.

[–]Vranak 2 points3 points ago

Lower gravity = bone density loss = lengthy rehabilitation when you get back to earth = NOPE

[–]WildlifeAnalysis 6 points7 points ago

What about around the year 5000 or something? You really think you can definitively say that we will never have a large population on the moon, ever?

[–]yev001 2 points3 points ago

It is possible that there will never be a need for it. The energy requirement to get to the moon is no different to the energy requirement to get to Mars or any other body.

Bit like people never having massive cities on the North or South pole, you can get there easy enough now... There are just much nicer places to live.

There will definitely be science stations, maybe even hotels, but I doubt it would be anything big enough to be visible from earth in this way.

[–]Number127 3 points4 points ago

What would be the incentive to have a large number of people living on the moon? Lack of living space on earth? It would arguably be easier/cheaper to colonize the ocean floors or add another "level" to the surface of the earth than to build up that kind of infrastructure on the moon.

If we ever have a permanent presence on the moon, it'll be to do things that we can't do here. Helium-3 mining is one possibility. Launching interplanetary rockets might be another (much less gravity to overcome). But you wouldn't need millions of people for those.

[–]YNot1989 2 points3 points ago

There's this isotope called Helium-3 that will make you change your mind about that.

[–]vulpes_occulta 3 points4 points ago

So, you're saying it's Nevada.

[–]NotTheEndToday 1 point2 points ago

:(

[–]complex_reduction 2 points3 points ago

You can't really say "In the future living on the moon will be impractical". Who knows what will happen in the future?

Look at how fast technology is moving now. It's insane. Who knows what we might figure out next? Shit for all we know some scientist might this very moment stumble onto a discovery that makes space travel/habitation as easy as travel/habitation on earth. Probably not, but maybe!

Science.

[–]Vranak 3 points4 points ago

Ever heard of peak oil?

Easy energy is what has fueled all this progress but now that we're halfway through the earth's reserves I don't think it's reasonable to project the same rate of technological advancement. If anything we'll be eating squirrels shot with a bow over an open fire in 50 years, those few of us who haven't starved to death that is. Lunar megacities? Pfft, absolute pipe dream from someone who doesn't understand how the world really works.

[–]Roo_Rocket 8 points9 points ago

That's no moon, it's a space station!

[–]learntofart 12 points13 points ago

Isn't the moon just a barren rock though? I can't imagine having to live there being anything desirable. I mean, the novelty of "Yeah bitch, living on the moooooon" can't last an entire lifetime of having to resort to living in a contained environment, completely dependent of outside sources and under constant threat of imminent death upon any sizable malfunction. Given from what I understand, the moon doesn't have an impacting atmosphere, it wouldn't even do a proper job at thwarting debris, making living there even more of a gamble. Maybe I'm just overthinking it.

[–]on_the_redpill 6 points7 points ago

...underground. Almost everything would be underground

[–]salg622 2 points3 points ago

Made me think...

[–]fogburner 4 points5 points ago

First thought, "that would be cool."

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

I actually said those very same words out loud (to no one in particular), even though I'm Norwegian. :P Laughed when I saw you had posted it.

[–]COXIMUS 0 points1 point ago

Only $1 million for a trip to the moon... I've started my fund

[–]The_guy_behind_you 0 points1 point ago

People with ocd are gonna be pissed

[–]Chiefzakk 2 points3 points ago

That would be a spectacular sight

[–]realyfckingsarcastic 2 points3 points ago

More likely it will be a giant McDonald's logo.

[–]fagalisk3 0 points1 point ago

Why would you ever want to live on the moon? Dirty, cold, shitty, no trees, nothing even to mine, except helium 3 and dirt. I can understand putting radio telescopes on the far side, but as for the rest of it, ew.

[–]second_hand_condom 0 points1 point ago

Heil Kortzfleisch!

[–]Potater757 2 points3 points ago

Not without Gingrich. (I'm with Newt, 2012).

[–]oddballodd 3 points4 points ago

I'd be willing to sign the Moon over to Gingrich.

As long as he goes there and STAYS there.

[–]Danny_Bomber 0 points1 point ago

Who spilled mustard on the moon?

[–]trainsacrossthesea 5 points6 points ago

"Our" view? I doubt it. Somebody's, someday? I like to think so.

[–]moshbeard 1 point2 points ago

You know what, I've never even considered this. It gives me a strange mix of emotions, on one hand it'll be pretty spectacular to look at the sky and realise we've come so far that we're not just stuck on this little planet any more but on the other hand it'll be quite sad to see we've began to ruin the rest of the universe too.

[–]dunfy 4 points5 points ago

I really hope I get to see this in my life time.

[–]little_gnora 5 points6 points ago

I very much so doubt it, but it's a stunning thought.

[–]y0nkers 4 points5 points ago

Although it may not happen for quite awhile there is no reason that it won't happen. Unless we kill ourselves, technology will continue to advance at more rapid rates. It will become an easier task to colonize it as a result. It's inevitable really.

[–]Overeacting 0 points1 point ago

Mars is a much easier and more attractive location to colonize, since it can actually be terraformed. From there, Europa looks decent. And who knows, Venus might turn out not to be a wash after all. All of these options are significantly better than the moon.

[–]auntacid 5 points6 points ago

Do you only doubt it because you doubt the civilization would be seen from space? Because if you doubt the whole idea coming to fruition, you might as well doubt the nomadic tendencies of homo sapiens sapiens.

[–]plutonn 4 points5 points ago

I am fully erect.

[–]simjanes2k 2 points3 points ago

Shit, I hope I have a nice view of Earth from there. Maybe my dim-witted and/or poor friends can wave at me from their hometown back on Earth.

[–]rekgreen 1 point2 points ago

Wow, awesome.

[–]ITSxDARE 1 point2 points ago

THAT WOULD BE FUCKING AWESOME

[–]Zermerus 1 point2 points ago

Wait until Handsome Jack shows up...

[–]manbeartruck -1 points0 points ago

now I'm sad because I know nothing like this will happen in my lifetime.

[–]IanMc90 1 point2 points ago

That's no moon...

[–]MindSecurity 0 points1 point ago

2012: When everything is made out of corn or China.

[–]ThisisIp 0 points1 point ago

I just got a science boner

[–]howfun 0 points1 point ago

http://www.epubbud.com/book.php?g=GR78L89A

THE MOON IS A HARSH MISTRESS Written by Robert Heinlein

[–]Mannex 0 points1 point ago

I always scoff at the supposed wonders that science proposes to offer but I even have to admit this would be baller

[–]argv_minus_one 0 points1 point ago

That would be so awesome.

[–]nicePenguin 0 points1 point ago

That Moon is way too big / too close to earth

[–]stuartcho 0 points1 point ago

Breathtaking

[–]philmoskowitz -1 points0 points ago

We're too busy protecting the corporate production roadmap so that revenue streams are protected to ever make any real progress anymore. Out of context concepts and real groundbreaking ideas are quashed in some way or another.

We'll never be ready for that incoming meteor that's coming to kill us.

[–]Newshoe 1 point2 points ago

We're whalers on the Moon
We carry a harpoon.
But there ain't no whales
So we tell tall tales
And sing our whaling tune

[–]Fhwqhgads 1 point2 points ago

Maybe if we had built on Neil Armstrong's achievement and kept going there regularly we'd have something up there by now. But it's been 40 years since anyone's been there.

[–]BeatsbyChrisBrown 0 points1 point ago

Thought it was gonna have "CHA" on it...see if anyone gets this reference...

[–]Frankeh 0 points1 point ago

Very unlikely. There's shit all up there.

[–]stry8993 1 point2 points ago

You'll like this then!!! The Time Machine - 2002 - Moon Scene and this too http://youtu.be/kiCHjfXP9_M sorry for the cheesy music, not my vid.

[–]DeltaTeam 0 points1 point ago

Those stars

[–]speaktodragons 1 point2 points ago

This would be a better goal for the US than continually screwing around in the middle east.

[–]PizzaGood 1 point2 points ago

While I share the hope that we'll someday get off this rock (it's my biggest hope for the species)...

Hopefully by the time we get to the moon we won't be wasting power lighting up the sky like that.

It makes me sad to see "earth at night" posters - light pollution is ugly.

Doubly so on the moon - in order to shield against radiation there, we'll be living underground. There won't be any reason to have lights on the surface other than landing guidance.

[–]bananaskates 0 points1 point ago

I hope so, because it would be awesome. Almost as awesome as if I was looking back the other way.

[–]Stall0ne 1 point2 points ago

All your base are belong to us!

[–]conkyflsm 0 points1 point ago

Is the moon on fucking fire?! Why would you want this?!

[–]Nihilgeist 0 points1 point ago

Certainly not in our lifetimes.

[–]mickygeeofNT -1 points0 points ago

Is that a city or nuclear waste?

[–]skepsis420 1 point2 points ago

seems so pointless to colonize the moon......earth not good enough?

[–]the_man_downunder 1 point2 points ago

Ahh.. Isn't the scale of that roughly equivalent to a structure the size of Italy?

[–]mjm8218 0 points1 point ago

I hope light pollution will be much better controlled by then.

[–]psych00range 1 point2 points ago

would be sick..one question how do you get electricity, running water and natural gas on the moon to sustain that much life? i mean you could use solar power but not everything can be run on solar power yet.

[–]saucysteak 1 point2 points ago

And to think people laughed at Newt Gingrich when he proposed this idea.

[–]rikashiku -1 points0 points ago

Is it me, or does that look kinda like New Zealand?

[–]Stevenup7002 -1 points0 points ago

Well I hope the lights won't be so... yellow. It looks as if someone sneezed on the moon.

[–]Jrook -1 points0 points ago

Oh yeah great just what we need. giant moon boogers

[–]Tearill -1 points0 points ago

I hope not.

[–]strik3r2k8 -1 points0 points ago

Then they discover an unknown material that seeps through the suits and causes a sickness that spreads. Communication is lost with the colony, thousands of people are cut off. A team is sent there to investigate only to be greeted by the horrifying creatures who live underground and carry a parasite they they are immune to but killed off the colonists.

And now that I think of it, I had to change it from "creatures that were once the colonists" to "creatures that carried a disease that killed off the colonists" in order for it not to sound like Dead Space, but now it sounds like "Apollo 18 Pt2"..

[–]worldofoz -1 points0 points ago

Oh I hope not...

[–]criticalnegation -1 points0 points ago

the whole thorium thing has me thinking about this a lot...there are thorium deposits on the moon, thus local sources of energy.

[–]StormMind 0 points1 point ago

Cocoon

[–]Juandough 0 points1 point ago

I bet it will have giant LED signs for advertising....

[–]ShitOnMyFartingBoner 0 points1 point ago

Nah, probably not.

[–]bttheolgee 0 points1 point ago

NEWT'S ANSWER FOR AMERICA

[–]joho0 0 points1 point ago

Is that the glow of radioactive fallout left over from the First Lunar War?

[–]bilateralchicken 0 points1 point ago

That looks like some Twilight Princess shit right there.

[–]VWBusMan 0 points1 point ago

There is hope for the Chinese overpopulation problem...

[–]darknite311 0 points1 point ago

Doubtfull unless we alter the moons gravity levels to something more suitable for us to live with.

[–]Ztiller 0 points1 point ago

What furstrates me the most is that we have the technology for this. But (understandably) nobody is willing to spend the resources on it.